Estimation of pairwise relatedness with molecular markers (original) (raw)

Abstract

Applications of quantitative genetics and conservation genetics often require measures of pairwise relationships between individuals, which, in the absence of known pedigree structure, can be estimated only by use of molecular markers. Here we introduce methods for the joint estimation of the two-gene and four-gene coefficients of relationship from data on codominant molecular markers in randomly mating populations. In a comparison with other published estimators of pairwise relatedness, we find these new "regression" estimators to be computationally simpler and to yield similar or lower sampling variances, particularly when many loci are used or when loci are hypervariable. Two examples are given in which the new estimators are applied to natural populations, one that reveals isolation-by-distance in an annual plant and the other that suggests a genetic basis for a coat color polymorphism in bears.

Full Text

The Full Text of this article is available as a PDF (213.9 KB).

Selected References

These references are in PubMed. This may not be the complete list of references from this article.

  1. Cockerham C. C. Higher order probability functions of identity of allelles by descent. Genetics. 1971 Oct;69(2):235–246. doi: 10.1093/genetics/69.2.235. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  2. KEMPTHORNE O. The correlation between relatives in a random mating population. Proc R Soc Lond B Biol Sci. 1954 Dec 15;143(910):102–113. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  3. LI C. C., HORVITZ D. G. Some methods of estimating the inbreeding coefficient. Am J Hum Genet. 1953 Jun;5(2):107–117. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  4. Li C. C., Weeks D. E., Chakravarti A. Similarity of DNA fingerprints due to chance and relatedness. Hum Hered. 1993 Jan-Feb;43(1):45–52. doi: 10.1159/000154113. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  5. Lynch M. Estimation of relatedness by DNA fingerprinting. Mol Biol Evol. 1988 Sep;5(5):584–599. doi: 10.1093/oxfordjournals.molbev.a040518. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  6. Lynch M., Milligan B. G. Analysis of population genetic structure with RAPD markers. Mol Ecol. 1994 Apr;3(2):91–99. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-294x.1994.tb00109.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  7. Paetkau D., Calvert W., Stirling I., Strobeck C. Microsatellite analysis of population structure in Canadian polar bears. Mol Ecol. 1995 Jun;4(3):347–354. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-294x.1995.tb00227.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  8. Thompson E. A. A restriction on the space of genetic relationships. Ann Hum Genet. 1976 Nov;40(2):201–204. doi: 10.1111/j.1469-1809.1976.tb00181.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  9. Thompson E. A. The estimation of pairwise relationships. Ann Hum Genet. 1975 Oct;39(2):173–188. doi: 10.1111/j.1469-1809.1975.tb00120.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]