The distribution of fitness effects among beneficial mutations (original) (raw)

Abstract

We know little about the distribution of fitness effects among new beneficial mutations, a problem that partly reflects the rarity of these changes. Surprisingly, though, population genetic theory allows us to predict what this distribution should look like under fairly general assumptions. Using extreme value theory, I derive this distribution and show that it has two unexpected properties. First, the distribution of beneficial fitness effects at a gene is exponential. Second, the distribution of beneficial effects at a gene has the same mean regardless of the fitness of the present wild-type allele. Adaptation from new mutations is thus characterized by a kind of invariance: natural selection chooses from the same spectrum of beneficial effects at a locus independent of the fitness rank of the present wild type. I show that these findings are reasonably robust to deviations from several assumptions. I further show that one can back calculate the mean size of new beneficial mutations from the observed mean size of fixed beneficial mutations.

Full Text

The Full Text of this article is available as a PDF (108.4 KB).

Selected References

These references are in PubMed. This may not be the complete list of references from this article.

  1. ATWOOD K. C., SCHNEIDER L. K., RYAN F. J. Selective mechanisms in bacteria. Cold Spring Harb Symp Quant Biol. 1951;16:345–355. doi: 10.1101/sqb.1951.016.01.026. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  2. Bull J. J., Badgett M. R., Wichman H. A. Big-benefit mutations in a bacteriophage inhibited with heat. Mol Biol Evol. 2000 Jun;17(6):942–950. doi: 10.1093/oxfordjournals.molbev.a026375. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  3. Gerrish P. J., Lenski R. E. The fate of competing beneficial mutations in an asexual population. Genetica. 1998;102-103(1-6):127–144. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  4. Gerrish P. The rhythm of microbial adaptation. Nature. 2001 Sep 20;413(6853):299–302. doi: 10.1038/35095046. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  5. Gillespie J. H. A simple stochastic gene substitution model. Theor Popul Biol. 1983 Apr;23(2):202–215. doi: 10.1016/0040-5809(83)90014-x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  6. Hartl D. L., Taubes C. H. Towards a theory of evolutionary adaptation. Genetica. 1998;102-103(1-6):525–533. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  7. Holder K. K., Bull J. J. Profiles of adaptation in two similar viruses. Genetics. 2001 Dec;159(4):1393–1404. doi: 10.1093/genetics/159.4.1393. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  8. Imhof M., Schlotterer C. Fitness effects of advantageous mutations in evolving Escherichia coli populations. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2001 Jan 30;98(3):1113–1117. doi: 10.1073/pnas.98.3.1113. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  9. Lenski R. E., Travisano M. Dynamics of adaptation and diversification: a 10,000-generation experiment with bacterial populations. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1994 Jul 19;91(15):6808–6814. doi: 10.1073/pnas.91.15.6808. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  10. Orr H. A. Adaptation and the cost of complexity. Evolution. 2000 Feb;54(1):13–20. doi: 10.1111/j.0014-3820.2000.tb00002.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  11. Orr H. Allen. A minimum on the mean number of steps taken in adaptive walks. J Theor Biol. 2003 Jan 21;220(2):241–247. doi: 10.1006/jtbi.2003.3161. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  12. Orr H. Allen. The population genetics of adaptation: the adaptation of DNA sequences. Evolution. 2002 Jul;56(7):1317–1330. doi: 10.1111/j.0014-3820.2002.tb01446.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  13. Otto S. P., Jones C. D. Detecting the undetected: estimating the total number of loci underlying a quantitative trait. Genetics. 2000 Dec;156(4):2093–2107. doi: 10.1093/genetics/156.4.2093. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  14. Rozen Daniel E., de Visser J. Arjan G. M., Gerrish Philip J. Fitness effects of fixed beneficial mutations in microbial populations. Curr Biol. 2002 Jun 25;12(12):1040–1045. doi: 10.1016/s0960-9822(02)00896-5. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  15. Smith J. M. Natural selection and the concept of a protein space. Nature. 1970 Feb 7;225(5232):563–564. doi: 10.1038/225563a0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  16. Wahl L. M., Krakauer D. C. Models of experimental evolution: the role of genetic chance and selective necessity. Genetics. 2000 Nov;156(3):1437–1448. doi: 10.1093/genetics/156.3.1437. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  17. Wichman H. A., Badgett M. R., Scott L. A., Boulianne C. M., Bull J. J. Different trajectories of parallel evolution during viral adaptation. Science. 1999 Jul 16;285(5426):422–424. doi: 10.1126/science.285.5426.422. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]