Use of corporate sponsorship as a tobacco marketing tool: a review of tobacco industry sponsorship in the USA, 1995-99 (original) (raw)

Abstract

_OBJECTIVE_—To describe the nature and extent of tobacco company sponsorship in the USA during the period 1995-99 and analyse this sponsorship in a marketing context. _DESIGN_—A cross-sectional study of tobacco company sponsorships identified through a customised research report from IEG Inc, and from internet web site searches. _METHODS_—First, a customised report was received from IEG Inc, which identified sponsorship activities for Philip Morris, RJ Reynolds, Brown & Williamson, Lorillard, and US Tobacco for the years 1997 and 1998. Second, the internet was systematically searched for tobacco industry sponsorships during the period 1995-99 by the same parent companies and their respective brands. _RESULTS_—During the period 1995-99, tobacco companies sponsored at least 2733 events, programmes, and organisations in the USA. Sponsorships involved all 50 states and the District of Columbia, and the minimum total funding amount of these sponsorships was $365.4 million. Tobacco corporate sponsorships involved numerous small, community based organisations, both through direct funding and through grants to larger umbrella organisations, and many of these organisations were part of the public health infrastructure. _CONCLUSIONS_—Tobacco corporate sponsorship serves as an important marketing tool for tobacco companies, serving both a sales promotion and public relations function. Public health practitioners need to develop better surveillance systems for monitoring tobacco sponsorship, to seek out alternative funding sources for tobacco company sponsored events and organisations, and to consider promoting a ban on tobacco sponsorship, possibly linking such regulation to the creation of alternative funding sources. Keywords: marketing; sponsorship; tobacco industry

Full Text

The Full Text of this article is available as a PDF (135.8 KB).

Selected References

These references are in PubMed. This may not be the complete list of references from this article.

  1. Blum A. The Marlboro Grand Prix. Circumvention of the television ban on tobacco advertising. N Engl J Med. 1991 Mar 28;324(13):913–917. doi: 10.1056/NEJM199103283241310. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  2. Connolly G. N., Orleans C. T., Blum A. Snuffing tobacco out of sport. Am J Public Health. 1992 Mar;82(3):351–353. doi: 10.2105/ajph.82.3.351. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  3. Davis R. M. Current trends in cigarette advertising and marketing. N Engl J Med. 1987 Mar 19;316(12):725–732. doi: 10.1056/NEJM198703193161206. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  4. Ernster V. L. Women, smoking, cigarette advertising and cancer. Women Health. 1986 Fall-Winter;11(3-4):217–235. doi: 10.1300/j013v11n03_15. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  5. Holman C. D., Donovan R. J., Corti B., Jalleh G., Frizzell S. K., Carroll A. M. Banning tobacco sponsorship: replacing tobacco with health messages and creating health-promoting environments. Tob Control. 1997 Summer;6(2):115–121. doi: 10.1136/tc.6.2.115. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  6. Madden P. A., Grube J. W. The frequency and nature of alcohol and tobacco advertising in televised sports, 1990 through 1992. Am J Public Health. 1994 Feb;84(2):297–299. doi: 10.2105/ajph.84.2.297. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  7. Musk A. W., Shean R., Walker N., Swanson M. Progress on smoking control in Western Australia. BMJ. 1994 Feb 5;308(6925):395–398. doi: 10.1136/bmj.308.6925.395. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  8. Powles J. W., Gifford S. Health of nations: lessons from Victoria, Australia. BMJ. 1993 Jan 9;306(6870):125–127. doi: 10.1136/bmj.306.6870.125. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  9. Tuckson R. V. Race, sex, economics, and tobacco advertising. J Natl Med Assoc. 1989 Nov;81(11):1119–1124. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]