Enhancing the effectiveness of tobacco package warning labels: a social psychological perspective (original) (raw)

Abstract

Objective: To outline social psychological principles that could influence the psychosocial and behavioural effects of tobacco warning labels, and to inform the development of more effective tobacco warning labels.

Data sources: PsycInfo and Medline literature searches and expert guided selection of principles and theories in social psychology and of tobacco warning labels, including articles, books, and reports.

Conclusions: Tobacco warning labels represent a potentially effective method of influencing attitudes and behaviours. This review describes social psychological principles that could be used to guide the creation of more effective warning labels. The potential value of incorporating warning labels into a broader public health education campaign is discussed, and directions for future research are suggested.

Full Text

The Full Text of this article is available as a PDF (332.4 KB).

Selected References

These references are in PubMed. This may not be the complete list of references from this article.

  1. Aronson E., Fried C., Stone J. Overcoming denial and increasing the intention to use condoms through the induction of hypocrisy. Am J Public Health. 1991 Dec;81(12):1636–1638. doi: 10.2105/ajph.81.12.1636. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  2. Banks S. M., Salovey P., Greener S., Rothman A. J., Moyer A., Beauvais J., Epel E. The effects of message framing on mammography utilization. Health Psychol. 1995 Mar;14(2):178–184. doi: 10.1037//0278-6133.14.2.178. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  3. Biglan A., McConnell S., Severson H. H., Bavry J., Ary D. A situational analysis of adolescent smoking. J Behav Med. 1984 Mar;7(1):109–114. doi: 10.1007/BF00845349. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  4. Borland R., Hill D. Initial impact of the new Australian tobacco health warnings on knowledge and beliefs. Tob Control. 1997 Winter;6(4):317–325. doi: 10.1136/tc.6.4.317. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  5. Borland R. Tobacco health warnings and smoking-related cognitions and behaviours. Addiction. 1997 Nov;92(11):1427–1435. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  6. Detweiler J. B., Bedell B. T., Salovey P., Pronin E., Rothman A. J. Message framing and sunscreen use: gain-framed messages motivate beach-goers. Health Psychol. 1999 Mar;18(2):189–196. doi: 10.1037//0278-6133.18.2.189. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  7. Fishbein M. A theory of reasoned action: some applications and implications. Nebr Symp Motiv. 1980;27:65–116. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  8. Greenwald A. G., McGhee D. E., Schwartz J. L. Measuring individual differences in implicit cognition: the implicit association test. J Pers Soc Psychol. 1998 Jun;74(6):1464–1480. doi: 10.1037//0022-3514.74.6.1464. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  9. Herek G. M. Beyond "homophobia": a social psychological perspective on attitudes toward lesbians and gay men. J Homosex. 1984 Fall;10(1-2):1–21. doi: 10.1300/J082v10n01_01. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  10. Hu T. W., Sung H. Y., Keeler T. E. Reducing cigarette consumption in California: tobacco taxes vs an anti-smoking media campaign. Am J Public Health. 1995 Sep;85(9):1218–1222. doi: 10.2105/ajph.85.9.1218. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  11. Jenkins C. N., McPhee S. J., Le A., Pham G. Q., Ha N. T., Stewart S. The effectiveness of a media-led intervention to reduce smoking among Vietnamese-American men. Am J Public Health. 1997 Jun;87(6):1031–1034. doi: 10.2105/ajph.87.6.1031. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  12. Kalichman S. C., Coley B. Context framing to enhance HIV-antibody-testing messages targeted to African American women. Health Psychol. 1995 May;14(3):247–254. doi: 10.1037//0278-6133.14.3.247. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  13. Marteau T. M. Framing of information: its influence upon decisions of doctors and patients. Br J Soc Psychol. 1989 Mar;28(Pt 1):89–94. doi: 10.1111/j.2044-8309.1989.tb00849.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  14. McNeil B. J., Pauker S. G., Sox H. C., Jr, Tversky A. On the elicitation of preferences for alternative therapies. N Engl J Med. 1982 May 27;306(21):1259–1262. doi: 10.1056/NEJM198205273062103. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  15. Meyerowitz B. E., Chaiken S. The effect of message framing on breast self-examination attitudes, intentions, and behavior. J Pers Soc Psychol. 1987 Mar;52(3):500–510. doi: 10.1037//0022-3514.52.3.500. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  16. O'Callaghan F. V., Callan V. J., Baglioni A. Cigarette use by adolescents: attitude-behavior relationships. Subst Use Misuse. 1999 Feb;34(3):455–468. doi: 10.3109/10826089909035656. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  17. Presti D. E., Ary D. V., Lichtenstein E. The context of smoking initiation and maintenance: findings from interviews with youths. J Subst Abuse. 1992;4(1):35–45. doi: 10.1016/0899-3289(92)90026-t. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  18. Richards J. W., Fischer P., Conner F. G. The warnings on cigarette packages are ineffective. JAMA. 1989 Jan 6;261(1):45–45. doi: 10.1001/jama.1989.03420010055025. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  19. Sullum J., Clark M. M., King T. K. Predictors of exercise relapse in a college population. J Am Coll Health. 2000 Jan;48(4):175–180. doi: 10.1080/07448480009595693. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  20. Tunstall C. D., Ginsberg D., Hall S. M. Quitting smoking. Int J Addict. 1985 Jun-Jul;20(6-7):1089–1112. doi: 10.3109/10826088509047766. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  21. Tversky A., Kahneman D. The framing of decisions and the psychology of choice. Science. 1981 Jan 30;211(4481):453–458. doi: 10.1126/science.7455683. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  22. Witte K., Allen M. A meta-analysis of fear appeals: implications for effective public health campaigns. Health Educ Behav. 2000 Oct;27(5):591–615. doi: 10.1177/109019810002700506. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]