Polarization of the Golgi apparatus and the microtubule-organizing center in cultured fibroblasts at the edge of an experimental wound (original) (raw)

Abstract

We have used the technique of experimental wounding of confluent monolayers of normal fibroblasts to induce essentially unidirectional and synchronous cell movement at the edge of the wound. The intracellular location of the Golgi apparatus and the microtubule-organizing center was determined by double indirect immunofluorescence microscopy, using antibodies specific for the membranes of the Golgi apparatus and antibodies specific for tubulin, respectively. In cells at the wound edge, the immunolabeled Golgi apparatus and microtubule-organizing center were in close proximity to one another and located predominantly forward of the cell nucleus facing the wound. In the same cultures in cells removed from the wound, the two organelles were also coordinately located; however, they were randomly oriented with respect to the wound edge. This reorientation of the two organelles in cells at the wound edge was evident within minutes after wounding and persisted as cell extension subsequently occurred into the wound. These results suggest that both the Golgi apparatus and the microtubule-organizing center may participate in directing cell movement. The possible mechanisms involved are discussed in the light of previous hypotheses and experimental evidence concerning cell motility.

2603

Images in this article

Selected References

These references are in PubMed. This may not be the complete list of references from this article.

  1. Abercrombie M., Heaysman J. E., Pegrum S. M. The locomotion of fibroblasts in culture. 3. Movements of particles on the dorsal surface of the leading lamella. Exp Cell Res. 1970 Oct;62(2):389–398. doi: 10.1016/0014-4827(70)90570-7. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  2. Abercrombie M., Heaysman J. E., Pegrum S. M. The locomotion of fibroblasts in culture. I. Movements of the leading edge. Exp Cell Res. 1970 Mar;59(3):393–398. doi: 10.1016/0014-4827(70)90646-4. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  3. Albrecht-Buehler G., Bushnell A. The orientation of centrioles in migrating 3T3 cells. Exp Cell Res. 1979 Apr;120(1):111–118. doi: 10.1016/0014-4827(79)90542-1. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  4. Albrecht-Buehler G. Daughter 3T3 cells. Are they mirror images of each other? J Cell Biol. 1977 Mar;72(3):595–603. doi: 10.1083/jcb.72.3.595. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  5. Ball E. H., Singer S. J. Association of microtubules and intermediate filaments in normal fibroblasts and its disruption upon transformation by a temperature-sensitive mutant of Rous sarcoma virus. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1981 Nov;78(11):6986–6990. doi: 10.1073/pnas.78.11.6986. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  6. Bergmann J. E., Tokuyasu K. T., Singer S. J. Passage of an integral membrane protein, the vesicular stomatitis virus glycoprotein, through the Golgi apparatus en route to the plasma membrane. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1981 Mar;78(3):1746–1750. doi: 10.1073/pnas.78.3.1746. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  7. Brinkley B. R., Fuller E. M., Highfield D. P. Cytoplasmic microtubules in normal and transformed cells in culture: analysis by tubulin antibody immunofluorescence. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1975 Dec;72(12):4981–4985. doi: 10.1073/pnas.72.12.4981. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  8. Farquhar M. G., Palade G. E. The Golgi apparatus (complex)-(1954-1981)-from artifact to center stage. J Cell Biol. 1981 Dec;91(3 Pt 2):77s–103s. doi: 10.1083/jcb.91.3.77s. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  9. Franke W. W., Grund C., Osborn M., Weber K. The intermediate-sized filaments in rat kangaroo PtK2 cells. I. Morphology in situ. Cytobiologie. 1978 Aug;17(2):365–391. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  10. Geiger B., Singer S. J. Association of microtubules and intermediate filaments in chicken gizzard cells as detected by double immunofluorescence. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1980 Aug;77(8):4769–4773. doi: 10.1073/pnas.77.8.4769. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  11. Goldman R. D. The role of three cytoplasmic fibers in BHK-21 cell motility. I. Microtubules and the effects of colchicine. J Cell Biol. 1971 Dec;51(3):752–762. doi: 10.1083/jcb.51.3.752. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  12. Gotlieb A. I., Heggeness M. H., Ash J. F., Singer S. J. Mechanochemical proteins, cell motility and cell-cell contacts: the localization of mechanochemical proteins inside cultured cells at the edge of an in vitro "wound". J Cell Physiol. 1979 Sep;100(3):563–578. doi: 10.1002/jcp.1041000318. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  13. Gotlieb A. I., May L. M., Subrahmanyan L., Kalnins V. I. Distribution of microtubule organizing centers in migrating sheets of endothelial cells. J Cell Biol. 1981 Nov;91(2 Pt 1):589–594. doi: 10.1083/jcb.91.2.589. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  14. Harris A., Dunn G. Centripetal transport of attached particles on both surfaces of moving fibroblasts. Exp Cell Res. 1972 Aug;73(2):519–523. doi: 10.1016/0014-4827(72)90084-5. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  15. Hay E. D. Extracellular matrix. J Cell Biol. 1981 Dec;91(3 Pt 2):205s–223s. doi: 10.1083/jcb.91.3.205s. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  16. Heggeness M. H., Simon M., Singer S. J. Association of mitochondria with microtubules in cultured cells. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1978 Aug;75(8):3863–3866. doi: 10.1073/pnas.75.8.3863. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  17. Holmes L. B., Trelstad R. L. Patterns of cell polarity in the developing mouse limb. Dev Biol. 1977 Sep;59(2):164–173. doi: 10.1016/0012-1606(77)90251-2. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  18. Huxley H. E. Muscular contraction and cell motility. Nature. 1973 Jun 22;243(5408):445–449. doi: 10.1038/243445a0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  19. Izzard C. S., Lochner L. R. Formation of cell-to-substrate contacts during fibroblast motility: an interference-reflexion study. J Cell Sci. 1980 Apr;42:81–116. doi: 10.1242/jcs.42.1.81. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  20. Louvard D., Reggio H., Warren G. Antibodies to the Golgi complex and the rough endoplasmic reticulum. J Cell Biol. 1982 Jan;92(1):92–107. doi: 10.1083/jcb.92.1.92. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  21. MARCUS P. I. Dynamics of surface modification in myxovirus-infected cells. Cold Spring Harb Symp Quant Biol. 1962;27:351–365. doi: 10.1101/sqb.1962.027.001.033. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  22. Malech H. L., Root R. K., Gallin J. I. Structural analysis of human neutrophil migration. Centriole, microtubule, and microfilament orientation and function during chemotaxis. J Cell Biol. 1977 Dec;75(3):666–693. doi: 10.1083/jcb.75.3.666. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  23. Osborn M., Weber K. Cytoplasmic microtubules in tissue culture cells appear to grow from an organizing structure towards the plasma membrane. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1976 Mar;73(3):867–871. doi: 10.1073/pnas.73.3.867. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  24. Trelstad R. L. The Golgi apparatus in chick corneal epithelium: changes in intracellular position during development. J Cell Biol. 1970 Apr;45(1):34–42. doi: 10.1083/jcb.45.1.34. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  25. Vasiliev J. M., Gelfand I. M., Domnina L. V., Ivanova O. Y., Komm S. G., Olshevskaja L. V. Effect of colcemid on the locomotory behaviour of fibroblasts. J Embryol Exp Morphol. 1970 Nov;24(3):625–640. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]