Chromosome instability mutants of Saccharomyces cerevisiae that are defective in microtubule-mediated processes (original) (raw)

Abstract

By using a multiply marked supernumerary chromosome III as an indicator, we isolated mutants of Saccharomyces cerevisiae that display increased rates of chromosome loss. In addition to mutations in the tubulin-encoding TUB genes, we found mutations in the CIN1, CIN2, and CIN4 genes. These genes have been defined independently by mutations causing benomyl supersensitivity and are distinct from other known yeast genes that affect chromosome segregation. Detailed phenotypic characterization of cin mutants revealed several other phenotypes similar to those of tub mutants. Null alleles of these genes caused cold sensitivity for viability. At 11 degrees C, cin mutants arrest at the mitosis stage of their cell cycle because of loss of most microtubule structure. cin1, cin2, and cin4 mutations also cause defects in two other microtubule-mediated processes, nuclear migration and nuclear fusion (karyogamy). Overproduction of the CIN1 gene product was found to cause the same phenotype as loss of function, supersensitivity to benomyl. Our findings suggest that the CIN1, CIN2, and CIN4 proteins contribute to microtubule stability either by regulating the activity of a yeast microtubule component or as structural components of microtubules.

223

Images in this article

Selected References

These references are in PubMed. This may not be the complete list of references from this article.

  1. Bond J. F., Fridovich-Keil J. L., Pillus L., Mulligan R. C., Solomon F. A chicken-yeast chimeric beta-tubulin protein is incorporated into mouse microtubules in vivo. Cell. 1986 Feb 14;44(3):461–468. doi: 10.1016/0092-8674(86)90467-8. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  2. Broach J. R., Strathern J. N., Hicks J. B. Transformation in yeast: development of a hybrid cloning vector and isolation of the CAN1 gene. Gene. 1979 Dec;8(1):121–133. doi: 10.1016/0378-1119(79)90012-x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  3. Burke D., Gasdaska P., Hartwell L. Dominant effects of tubulin overexpression in Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Mol Cell Biol. 1989 Mar;9(3):1049–1059. doi: 10.1128/mcb.9.3.1049. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  4. Burnette W. N. "Western blotting": electrophoretic transfer of proteins from sodium dodecyl sulfate--polyacrylamide gels to unmodified nitrocellulose and radiographic detection with antibody and radioiodinated protein A. Anal Biochem. 1981 Apr;112(2):195–203. doi: 10.1016/0003-2697(81)90281-5. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  5. Byers B., Goetsch L. Behavior of spindles and spindle plaques in the cell cycle and conjugation of Saccharomyces cerevisiae. J Bacteriol. 1975 Oct;124(1):511–523. doi: 10.1128/jb.124.1.511-523.1975. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  6. Cleveland D. W., Hwo S. Y., Kirschner M. W. Purification of tau, a microtubule-associated protein that induces assembly of microtubules from purified tubulin. J Mol Biol. 1977 Oct 25;116(2):207–225. doi: 10.1016/0022-2836(77)90213-3. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  7. Davidse L. C., Flach W. Differential binding of methyl benzimidazol-2-yl carbamate to fungal tubulin as a mechanism of resistance to this antimitotic agent in mutant strains of Aspergillus nidulans. J Cell Biol. 1977 Jan;72(1):174–193. doi: 10.1083/jcb.72.1.174. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  8. Delgado M. A., Conde J. Benomyl prevents nuclear fusion in Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Mol Gen Genet. 1984;193(1):188–189. doi: 10.1007/BF00327435. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  9. Drubin D. G., Miller K. G., Botstein D. Yeast actin-binding proteins: evidence for a role in morphogenesis. J Cell Biol. 1988 Dec;107(6 Pt 2):2551–2561. doi: 10.1083/jcb.107.6.2551. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  10. Dutcher S. K., Hartwell L. H. The role of S. cerevisiae cell division cycle genes in nuclear fusion. Genetics. 1982 Feb;100(2):175–184. doi: 10.1093/genetics/100.2.175. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  11. Hartwell L. H., Smith D. Altered fidelity of mitotic chromosome transmission in cell cycle mutants of S. cerevisiae. Genetics. 1985 Jul;110(3):381–395. doi: 10.1093/genetics/110.3.381. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  12. Hieter P., Mann C., Snyder M., Davis R. W. Mitotic stability of yeast chromosomes: a colony color assay that measures nondisjunction and chromosome loss. Cell. 1985 Feb;40(2):381–392. doi: 10.1016/0092-8674(85)90152-7. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  13. Hiraoka Y., Toda T., Yanagida M. The NDA3 gene of fission yeast encodes beta-tubulin: a cold-sensitive nda3 mutation reversibly blocks spindle formation and chromosome movement in mitosis. Cell. 1984 Dec;39(2 Pt 1):349–358. doi: 10.1016/0092-8674(84)90013-8. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  14. Huffaker T. C., Hoyt M. A., Botstein D. Genetic analysis of the yeast cytoskeleton. Annu Rev Genet. 1987;21:259–284. doi: 10.1146/annurev.ge.21.120187.001355. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  15. Huffaker T. C., Thomas J. H., Botstein D. Diverse effects of beta-tubulin mutations on microtubule formation and function. J Cell Biol. 1988 Jun;106(6):1997–2010. doi: 10.1083/jcb.106.6.1997. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  16. Huisman O., Raymond W., Froehlich K. U., Errada P., Kleckner N., Botstein D., Hoyt M. A. A Tn10-lacZ-kanR-URA3 gene fusion transposon for insertion mutagenesis and fusion analysis of yeast and bacterial genes. Genetics. 1987 Jun;116(2):191–199. doi: 10.1093/genetics/116.2.191. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  17. Hutter K. J., Eipel H. E. Flow cytometric determinations of cellular substances in algae, bacteria, moulds and yeasts. Antonie Van Leeuwenhoek. 1978;44(3-4):269–282. doi: 10.1007/BF00394305. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  18. Jacobs C. W., Adams A. E., Szaniszlo P. J., Pringle J. R. Functions of microtubules in the Saccharomyces cerevisiae cell cycle. J Cell Biol. 1988 Oct;107(4):1409–1426. doi: 10.1083/jcb.107.4.1409. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  19. Johnston M., Davis R. W. Sequences that regulate the divergent GAL1-GAL10 promoter in Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Mol Cell Biol. 1984 Aug;4(8):1440–1448. doi: 10.1128/mcb.4.8.1440. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  20. Kilmartin J. V., Adams A. E. Structural rearrangements of tubulin and actin during the cell cycle of the yeast Saccharomyces. J Cell Biol. 1984 Mar;98(3):922–933. doi: 10.1083/jcb.98.3.922. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  21. Kilmartin J. V. Purification of yeast tubulin by self-assembly in vitro. Biochemistry. 1981 Jun 9;20(12):3629–3633. doi: 10.1021/bi00515a050. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  22. Kouprina NYu, Pashina O. B., Nikolaishwili N. T., Tsouladze A. M., Larionov V. L. Genetic control of chromosome stability in the yeast Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Yeast. 1988 Dec;4(4):257–269. doi: 10.1002/yea.320040404. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  23. Liras P., McCusker J., Mascioli S., Haber J. E. Characterization of a mutation in yeast causing nonrandom chromosome loss during mitosis. Genetics. 1978 Apr;88(4 Pt 1):651–671. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  24. Luck D. J. Genetic and biochemical dissection of the eucaryotic flagellum. J Cell Biol. 1984 Mar;98(3):789–794. doi: 10.1083/jcb.98.3.789. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  25. Ludueńa R. F., Shooter E. M., Wilson L. Structure of the tubulin dimer. J Biol Chem. 1977 Oct 25;252(20):7006–7014. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  26. Maine G. T., Sinha P., Tye B. K. Mutants of S. cerevisiae defective in the maintenance of minichromosomes. Genetics. 1984 Mar;106(3):365–385. doi: 10.1093/genetics/106.3.365. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  27. Meade J. H., Riley M. I., Manney T. R. Expression of cryptopleurine resistance in Saccharomyces cerevisiae. J Bacteriol. 1977 Mar;129(3):1428–1434. doi: 10.1128/jb.129.3.1428-1434.1977. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  28. Meeks-Wagner D., Hartwell L. H. Normal stoichiometry of histone dimer sets is necessary for high fidelity of mitotic chromosome transmission. Cell. 1986 Jan 17;44(1):43–52. doi: 10.1016/0092-8674(86)90483-6. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  29. Murphy D. B., Johnson K. A., Borisy G. G. Role of tubulin-associated proteins in microtubule nucleation and elongation. J Mol Biol. 1977 Nov 25;117(1):33–52. doi: 10.1016/0022-2836(77)90021-3. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  30. Neff N. F., Thomas J. H., Grisafi P., Botstein D. Isolation of the beta-tubulin gene from yeast and demonstration of its essential function in vivo. Cell. 1983 May;33(1):211–219. doi: 10.1016/0092-8674(83)90350-1. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  31. Olmsted J. B. Microtubule-associated proteins. Annu Rev Cell Biol. 1986;2:421–457. doi: 10.1146/annurev.cb.02.110186.002225. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  32. Pillus L., Solomon F. Components of microtubular structures in Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1986 Apr;83(8):2468–2472. doi: 10.1073/pnas.83.8.2468. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  33. Piperno G., LeDizet M., Chang X. J. Microtubules containing acetylated alpha-tubulin in mammalian cells in culture. J Cell Biol. 1987 Feb;104(2):289–302. doi: 10.1083/jcb.104.2.289. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  34. Quinlan R. A., Pogson C. I., Gull K. The influence of the microtubule inhibitor, methyl benzimidazol-2-yl-carbamate (MBC) on nuclear division and the cell cycle in Saccharomyces cerevisiae. J Cell Sci. 1980 Dec;46:341–352. doi: 10.1242/jcs.46.1.341. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  35. Rose M. D., Fink G. R. KAR1, a gene required for function of both intranuclear and extranuclear microtubules in yeast. Cell. 1987 Mar 27;48(6):1047–1060. doi: 10.1016/0092-8674(87)90712-4. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  36. Rothstein R. J. One-step gene disruption in yeast. Methods Enzymol. 1983;101:202–211. doi: 10.1016/0076-6879(83)01015-0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  37. Sammak P. J., Borisy G. G. Direct observation of microtubule dynamics in living cells. Nature. 1988 Apr 21;332(6166):724–726. doi: 10.1038/332724a0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  38. Schatz P. J., Georges G. E., Solomon F., Botstein D. Insertions of up to 17 amino acids into a region of alpha-tubulin do not disrupt function in vivo. Mol Cell Biol. 1987 Oct;7(10):3799–3805. doi: 10.1128/mcb.7.10.3799. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  39. Schatz P. J., Pillus L., Grisafi P., Solomon F., Botstein D. Two functional alpha-tubulin genes of the yeast Saccharomyces cerevisiae encode divergent proteins. Mol Cell Biol. 1986 Nov;6(11):3711–3721. doi: 10.1128/mcb.6.11.3711. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  40. Schatz P. J., Solomon F., Botstein D. Genetically essential and nonessential alpha-tubulin genes specify functionally interchangeable proteins. Mol Cell Biol. 1986 Nov;6(11):3722–3733. doi: 10.1128/mcb.6.11.3722. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  41. Schatz P. J., Solomon F., Botstein D. Isolation and characterization of conditional-lethal mutations in the TUB1 alpha-tubulin gene of the yeast Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Genetics. 1988 Nov;120(3):681–695. doi: 10.1093/genetics/120.3.681. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  42. Schulze E., Asai D. J., Bulinski J. C., Kirschner M. Posttranslational modification and microtubule stability. J Cell Biol. 1987 Nov;105(5):2167–2177. doi: 10.1083/jcb.105.5.2167. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  43. Shaffer B., Brearley I., Littlewood R., Fink G. R. A stable aneuploid of Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Genetics. 1971 Apr;67(4):483–495. doi: 10.1093/genetics/67.4.483. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  44. Sheir-Neiss G., Lai M. H., Morris N. R. Identification of a gene for beta-tubulin in Aspergillus nidulans. Cell. 1978 Oct;15(2):639–647. doi: 10.1016/0092-8674(78)90032-6. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  45. Thomas J. H., Neff N. F., Botstein D. Isolation and characterization of mutations in the beta-tubulin gene of Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Genetics. 1985 Dec;111(4):715–734. doi: 10.1093/genetics/111.4.715. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  46. Weisenberg R. C. Microtubule formation in vitro in solutions containing low calcium concentrations. Science. 1972 Sep 22;177(4054):1104–1105. doi: 10.1126/science.177.4054.1104. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  47. Whelan W. L., Gocke E., Manney T. R. The CAN1 locus of Saccharomyces cerevisiae: fine-structure analysis and forward mutation rates. Genetics. 1979 Jan;91(1):35–51. doi: 10.1093/genetics/91.1.35. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  48. Wood J. S. Genetic effects of methyl benzimidazole-2-yl-carbamate on Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Mol Cell Biol. 1982 Sep;2(9):1064–1079. doi: 10.1128/mcb.2.9.1064. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  49. Wood J. S., Hartwell L. H. A dependent pathway of gene functions leading to chromosome segregation in Saccharomyces cerevisiae. J Cell Biol. 1982 Sep;94(3):718–726. doi: 10.1083/jcb.94.3.718. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]