Model of effectively neutral mutations in which selective constraint is incorporated (original) (raw)

Abstract

Based on the idea that selective neutrality is the limit when the selective disadvantage becomes indefinitely small, a model of neutral (and nearly neutral) mutations is proposed that assumes that the selection coefficient (_s_′) against the mutant at various sites within a cistron (gene) follows a Γ distribution; f(_s_′) = αβ_e_-α_s_′_s_′β-1/Γ(β), in which α = β/_¯s_′ and _¯s_′ is the mean selection coefficient against the mutants (¯s_′ > 0; 1 [unk] β > 0). The mutation rate for alleles whose selection coefficients s_′ lie in the range between 0 and 1/(2_Ne), in which Ne is the effective population size, is termed the effectively neutral mutation rate (denoted by v_e). Using the model of “infinite sites” in population genetics, formulas are derived giving the average heterozygosity (¯he) and evolutionary rate per generation (kg) in terms of mutant substitutions. It is shown that, with parameter values such as β = 0.5 and ¯s_′ = 0.001, the average heterozygosity increases much more slowly as Ne increases, compared with the case in which a constant fraction of mutations are neutral. Furthermore, the rate of evolution per year (k_1) becomes constant among various organisms, if the generation span (g) in years is inversely proportional to √_Ne among them and if the mutation rate per generation is constant. Also, it is shown that we have roughly kg = v_e. The situation becomes quite different if slightly advantageous mutations occur at a constant rate independent of environmental conditions. In this case, the evolutionary rate can become enormously higher in a species with a very large population size than in a species with a small population size, contrary to the observed pattern of evolution at the molecular level.

Keywords: molecular evolution, protein polymorphism, population genetics, neutral mutation theory

3440

Selected References

These references are in PubMed. This may not be the complete list of references from this article.

  1. Ayala F. J., Powell J. R., Tracey M. L., Mourão C. A., Pérez-Salas S. Enzyme variability in the Drosophila willistoni group. IV. Genic variation in natural populations of Drosophila willistoni. Genetics. 1972 Jan;70(1):113–139. doi: 10.1093/genetics/70.1.113. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  2. Ewens W. J. The sampling theory of selectively neutral alleles. Theor Popul Biol. 1972 Mar;3(1):87–112. doi: 10.1016/0040-5809(72)90035-4. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  3. Fuerst P. A., Chakraborty R., Nei M. Statistical studies on protein polymorphism in natural populations. I. Distribution of single locus heterozygosity. Genetics. 1977 Jun;86(2 Pt 1):455–483. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  4. Kimura M. Evolutionary rate at the molecular level. Nature. 1968 Feb 17;217(5129):624–626. doi: 10.1038/217624a0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  5. Kimura M., Ohta T. On some principles governing molecular evolution. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1974 Jul;71(7):2848–2852. doi: 10.1073/pnas.71.7.2848. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  6. Kimura M., Ohta T. Protein polymorphism as a phase of molecular evolution. Nature. 1971 Feb 12;229(5285):467–469. doi: 10.1038/229467a0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  7. Kimura M. The number of heterozygous nucleotide sites maintained in a finite population due to steady flux of mutations. Genetics. 1969 Apr;61(4):893–903. doi: 10.1093/genetics/61.4.893. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  8. Kimura M. The rate of molecular evolution considered from the standpoint of population genetics. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1969 Aug;63(4):1181–1188. doi: 10.1073/pnas.63.4.1181. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  9. Li W. H. Maintenance of Genetic Variability under the Joint Effect of Mutation, Selection and Random Drift. Genetics. 1978 Oct;90(2):349–382. doi: 10.1093/genetics/90.2.349. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  10. Li W. H. Maintenance of genetic variability under mutation and selection pressures in a finite population. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1977 Jun;74(6):2509–2513. doi: 10.1073/pnas.74.6.2509. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  11. Maruyama T., Kimura M. Theoretical study of genetic variability, assuming stepwise production of neutral and very slightly deleterious mutations. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1978 Feb;75(2):919–922. doi: 10.1073/pnas.75.2.919. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  12. Milkman R. Electrophoretic variation in Escherichia coli from natural sources. Science. 1973 Dec 7;182(4116):1024–1026. doi: 10.1126/science.182.4116.1024. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  13. Mukai T., Cockerham C. C. Spontaneous mutation rates at enzyme loci in Drosophila melanogaster. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1977 Jun;74(6):2514–2517. doi: 10.1073/pnas.74.6.2514. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  14. Neel J. V., Rothman E. D. Indirect estimates of mutation rates in tribal Amerindians. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1978 Nov;75(11):5585–5588. doi: 10.1073/pnas.75.11.5585. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  15. Nei M. Estimation of mutation rate from rare protein variants. Am J Hum Genet. 1977 May;29(3):225–232. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  16. Ohta T., Kimura M. A model of mutation appropriate to estimate the number of electrophoretically detectable alleles in a finite population. Genet Res. 1973 Oct;22(2):201–204. doi: 10.1017/s0016672300012994. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  17. Ohta T. Role of very slightly deleterious mutations in molecular evolution and polymorphism. Theor Popul Biol. 1976 Dec;10(3):254–275. doi: 10.1016/0040-5809(76)90019-8. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  18. Ohta T. Slightly deleterious mutant substitutions in evolution. Nature. 1973 Nov 9;246(5428):96–98. doi: 10.1038/246096a0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  19. Ota T. Mutational pressure as the main cause of molecular evolution and polymorphism. Nature. 1974 Nov 29;252(5482):351–354. doi: 10.1038/252351a0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  20. Ota T. Statistical analyses of Drosophila and human protein polymorphisms. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1975 Aug;72(8):3194–3196. doi: 10.1073/pnas.72.8.3194. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]