Side Effects of Minocycline: Different Dosage Regimens (original) (raw)
Antimicrob Agents Chemother. 1977 Nov; 12(5): 642–646.
Dieter W. Gump
1Department of Medicine, Division of Infectious Diseases, Burlington, Vermont 05401
Taka Ashikaga
2Department of Epidemiology and Environmental Health, University of Vermont College of Medicine, Burlington, Vermont 05401
Theodore J. Fink
1Department of Medicine, Division of Infectious Diseases, Burlington, Vermont 05401
Alan M. Radin
1Department of Medicine, Division of Infectious Diseases, Burlington, Vermont 05401
1Department of Medicine, Division of Infectious Diseases, Burlington, Vermont 05401
2Department of Epidemiology and Environmental Health, University of Vermont College of Medicine, Burlington, Vermont 05401
Abstract
The incidence of side effects due to two dosage regimens of minocycline was examined over a 5-day period. A total of 60 normal women volunteers were randomly assigned in a double-blind manner to either a group who took 100 mg of minocycline twice a day or a group who took 75 mg of minocycline twice a day for 5 days. Both groups were comparable from the standpoints of age, size, race, and the use of oral contraception, nicotine, and ethanol. They were seen on a daily basis, and symptoms were evaluated by both volunteers (from diaries) and physicians. Minocycline serum concentrations were determined on blood samples taken 2 h after the a.m. dose. Volunteers taking 150 mg of minocycline per day had significantly lower serum antibiotic concentrations than those taking 200 mg per day. However, both low- and high-dose groups exhibited similar incidence and prevalence of recorded symptoms, with the single exception of nausea, where the low-dose group had fewer symptoms than the high-dose group (P = 0.035). Symptomatic volunteers did not have higher serum concentrations of minocycline than their asymptomatic counterparts. When either weight or surface area was examined with antibiotic serum concentration there was a significant inverse correlation between the two on day 2 for both groups and also on day 4 for the low-dose group. It is concluded that, in women, a dose of 150 mg of minocycline per day is associated with the same degree of side effects as a dose of 200 mg per day.
Full text
Full text is available as a scanned copy of the original print version. Get a printable copy (PDF file) of the complete article (741K), or click on a page image below to browse page by page. Links to PubMed are also available for Selected References.
Selected References
These references are in PubMed. This may not be the complete list of references from this article.
- Allen JC. Minocycline. Ann Intern Med. 1976 Oct;85(4):482–487. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Bernard B, Yin EJ, Simon HJ. Clinical pharmacologic studies with minocycline. J Clin Pharmacol New Drugs. 1971 Sep-Oct;11(5):332–348. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Brogden RN, Speight TM, Avery GS. Minocycline: A review of its antibacterial and pharmacokinetic properties and therapeutic use. Drugs. 1975;9(4):251–291. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Fanning WL, Gump DW, Sofferman RA. Side effects of minocycline: a double-blind study. Antimicrob Agents Chemother. 1977 Apr;11(4):712–717. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Macdonald H, Kelly RG, Allen ES, Noble JF, Kanegis LA. Pharmacokinetic studies on minocycline in man. Clin Pharmacol Ther. 1973 Sep-Oct;14(5):852–861. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
Articles from Antimicrobial Agents and Chemotherapy are provided here courtesy of American Society for Microbiology (ASM)