Use of Drosophila mutants to distinguish among volatile general anesthetics. (original) (raw)

• Journal List
• Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A
• v.91(6); 1994 Mar 15
• PMC43324

Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1994 Mar 15; 91(6): 2135–2139.

Laboratory of Molecular Biology, National Institute of Mental Health, Bethesda, MD 20892-0036.

Abstract

The way general anesthetics cause their clinically useful effects on the nervous system is not known. Since the principal determinant of the potency of these agents is their solubility in oil, the role of chemical structure in affecting anesthetic targets has been obscured. In this work, we use an intense beam of light (Tinklenberg, J. A., Segal, I. S., Tianzhi, G. & Maze, M. (1991) Ann. N.Y. Acad. Sci. 625, 532-539) to assess the effect of general anesthetics on the capacity of fruit flies to sense a noxious stimulus and respond to it. By examining the effect of halothane-resistant (har) mutations on the potency of various volatile anesthetics in this assay, we establish similarities and differences between these agents that highlight the was chemical structure influences anesthetic action. In general, the potencies of anesthetics with different chemical structure are affected to different extents by one or more har mutations. However, three anesthetics of related structure (enflurane, isoflurane, and desflurane) show quantitatively indistinguishable alterations in potency in each of four genetic tests. These results not only identify important structural features of anesthetics but also place limits on the classical view that all anesthetics act at a common target.

Full text

Full text is available as a scanned copy of the original print version. Get a printable copy (PDF file) of the complete article (1.0M), or click on a page image below to browse page by page. Links to PubMed are also available for Selected References.

Images in this article

Click on the image to see a larger version.

Selected References

These references are in PubMed. This may not be the complete list of references from this article.

• Allada R, Nash HA. Drosophila melanogaster as a model for study of general anesthesia: the quantitative response to clinical anesthetics and alkanes. Anesth Analg. 1993 Jul;77(1):19–26. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
• Krishnan KS, Nash HA. A genetic study of the anesthetic response: mutants of Drosophila melanogaster altered in sensitivity to halothane. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1990 Nov;87(21):8632–8636. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
• Tinklenberg JA, Segal IS, Guo TZ, Maze M. Analysis of anesthetic action on the potassium channels of the Shaker mutant of Drosophila. Ann N Y Acad Sci. 1991;625:532–539. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
• Waud DR. On biological assays involving quantal responses. J Pharmacol Exp Ther. 1972 Dec;183(3):577–607. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
• Nash HA, Campbell DB, Krishnan KS. New mutants of Drosophila that are resistant to the anesthetic effects of halothane. Ann N Y Acad Sci. 1991;625:540–544. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
• Gamo S, Ogaki M, Nakashima-Tanaka E. Strain differences in minimum anesthetic concentrations in Drosophila melanogaster. Anesthesiology. 1981 Apr;54(4):289–293. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
• Koblin DD, Deady JE. Anaesthetic requirement in mice selectively bred for differences in ethanol sensitivity. Br J Anaesth. 1981 Jan;53(1):5–10. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
• Koblin DD, Deady JE, Eger EI., 2nd Potencies of inhaled anesthetics and alcohol in mice selectively bred for resistance and susceptibility to nitrous oxide anesthesia. Anesthesiology. 1982 Jan;56(1):18–24. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
• Morgan PG, Sedensky MM, Meneely PM, Cascorbi HF. The effect of two genes on anesthetic response in the nematode Caenorhabditis elegans. Anesthesiology. 1988 Aug;69(2):246–251. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
• Morgan PG, Sedensky M, Meneely PM. Multiple sites of action of volatile anesthetics in Caenorhabditis elegans. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1990 Apr;87(8):2965–2969. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
• McCrae AF, Gallaher EJ, Winter PM, Firestone LL. Volatile anesthetic requirements differ in mice selectively bred for sensitivity or resistance to diazepam: implications for the site of anesthesia. Anesth Analg. 1993 Jun;76(6):1313–1317. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
• Huff AC, Kreuzer KN. Evidence for a common mechanism of action for antitumor and antibacterial agents that inhibit type II DNA topoisomerases. J Biol Chem. 1990 Nov 25;265(33):20496–20505. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
• Corbett AH, Hong D, Osheroff N. Exploiting mechanistic differences between drug classes to define functional drug interaction domains on topoisomerase II. Evidence that several diverse DNA cleavage-enhancing agents share a common site of action on the enzyme. J Biol Chem. 1993 Jul 5;268(19):14394–14398. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America are provided here courtesy of National Academy of Sciences