Mutational Inactivation of Mitotic Checkpoint Genes, hsMAD2 and hBUB1, Is Rare in Sporadic Digestive Tract Cancers (original) (raw)

Abstract

Genetic instability is a key mechanism of tumorigenesis, and the instability exists at two distinct levels, the nucleotide and the chromosome levels. Disruption of the mitotic spindle checkpoint is one of the underlying mechanisms leading to aneuploidy and alterations of hsMAD2 and hBUB1, assumed to take part in the spindle checkpoint in human cells, have been found to be associated with chromosomal instability in some tumor cell lines. Therefore, we investigated the mutational status of the hsMAD2 and hBUB1 genes in 32 sporadic digestive tract cancers by reverse transcription‐ polymerase chain reaction‐single strand conformation polymorphism analysis. The entire coding sequence of the hsMAD2 gene, and conserved regions (codons 21–152 and codons 732–1043) presumed to be functionally important in the hBUB1 gene were analyzed. Mutation of the hsMAD2 gene was not observed at all and missense mutation of the hBUB1 gene was noted in one rectal cancer case. Sequencing analysis revealed an AGT‐to‐GGT missense mutation, substituting glycine for serine, at codon 950, which is conserved between budding yeast and human. These results indicate that mutations of the hsMAD2 and hBUB1 genes are very rare and presumably play a very restricted role in tumor development of sporadic cancers.

Keywords: hsMAD2, hBUB1, Mitotic checkpoint, Digestive tract cancers

Full Text

The Full Text of this article is available as a PDF (87.7 KB).

REFERENCES

• 1).Lengauer , C. , Kinzler , K. W. and Vogelstein , B.Genetic instability in human cancers . Nature , 396 , 643 – 649 ( 1998. ). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
• 2).Aaltonen , L. A. , Peltomaaki , P. , Leach , F. S. , Sistonen , P. , Pylkkanen , L. , Meckline , J.‐P. , Jarvinen , H. , Powell , S. M. , Jen , J. , Hamilton , S. R. , Petersen , G. M. , Kinzler , K. W. , Vogelstein , B. and de la Chapelle , A.Clues to the pathogenesis of familial colorectal cancer . Science , 260 , 812 – 816 ( 1993. ). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
• 3).Shibata , D. , Peinado , M. A. , Ionov , Y. , Malkhosyan , S. and Perucho , M.Genomic instability in repeated sequences is an early somatic event in colorectal tumorigenesis that persists after transformation . Nat. Genet. , 6 , 273 – 281 ( 1994. ). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
• 4).Kouri , M. , Laasonen , A. , Mecklin , J. P. , Jarvinen , H. , Franssila , K. and Pyrhonen , S.Diploid predominance in hereditary nonpolyposis colorectal carcinoma evaluated by flowcytometry . Cancer , 65 , 1825 – 1829 ( 1990. ). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
• 5).Frei , J. V.Hereditary nonpolyposis colorectal cancer (Lynch syndrome II). Diploid malignancies with prolonged survival . Cancer , 69 , 1108 – 1111 ( 1992. ). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
• 6).Orr‐Weaver , T. L. and Weinberg , R. A.A checkpoint on the road to cancer . Nature , 392 , 223 – 224 ( 1998. ). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
• 7).Hoyt , M. A. , Totis , L. and Roberts , B. T. S.cerevisiae genes required for cell cycle arrest in response to loss of microtubule function . Cell , 66 , 507 – 517 ( 1991. ). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
• 8).Li , R. and Murray , A.Feedback control of mitosis in budding yeast . Cell , 66 , 519 – 531 ( 1991. ). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
• 9).Li , Y. and Benezra , R.Identification of a human mitotic checkpoint gene: hsMAD2. Science , 274 , 246 – 248 ( 1996. ). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
• 10).Cahill , D. P. , Lengauer , C. , Yu , J. , Riggins , G. J. , Willson , J. K. V. , Markowitz , S. D. , Kinzler , K. W. and Vogelstein , B.Mutations of mitotic checkpoint genes in human cancers . Nature , 392 , 300 – 303 ( 1998. ). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
• 11).Japanese Society for Cancer of the Colon and Rectum . “ General Rules for Clinical and Pathological Studies on Cancer of the Colon, Rectum and Anus ” 6th Ed. ( 1998. ). Kanehara Co. , Tokyo . [Google Scholar]
• 12).Japanese Research Society for Gastric Cancer . “ The General Rules for the Gastric Cancer Study ” 12th Ed. ( 1993. ). Kanehara Co. , Tokyo . [Google Scholar]
• 13).Japanese Society for Esophageal Diseases . “ Guidelines for the Clinical and Pathologic Studies on Carcinoma of the Esophageal Diseases” , 9th Ed. ( 1999. ). Kanehara Co. , Tokyo . [Google Scholar]
• 14).Roberts , B. T. , Farr , K. A. and Hoyt , M. A.The Saccharomyces cerevisiae checkpoint gene BUB1 encodes a novel protein kinase . Mol. Cell. Biol. , 14 , 8282 – 8291 ( 1994. ). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
• 15).Taylor , S. S. and McKeon , F.Kinetochore localization of murine BUB1 is required for normal mitotic timing and checkpoint response to spindle damage . Cell , 89 , 727 – 735 ( 1997. ). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
• 16).Cahill , D. P. , da Costa , L. T. , Carson‐Walter , E. B. , Kinzler , K. W. , Vogelstein , B. and Lengauer , C.Characterization of hMAD2B and other mitotic spindle checkpoint genes . Genomics , 58 , 181 – 187 ( 1999. ). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]