Vesicle traffic through intercellular bridges in DU 145 human prostate cancer cells (original) (raw)

Abstract

We detected cell‐to‐cell communication via intercellular bridges in DU 145 human prostate cancer cells by fluorescence microscopy. Since DU 145 cells have deficient gap junctions, intercellular bridges may have a prominent role in the transfer of chemical signals between these cells. In culture, DU 145 cells are contiguous over several cell diameters through filopodial extensions, and directly communicate with adjacent cells across intercellular bridges. These structures range from 100 nm to 5 μm in diameter, and from a few microns to at least 50–100 μm in length. Time‐lapse imagery revealed that (1) filopodia rapidly move at a rate of microns per minute to contact neighboring cells and (2) intercellular bridges are conduits for transport of membrane vesicles (1–3 μm in diameter) between adjacent cells. Immunofluorescence detected alpha‐tubulin in intercellular bridges and filopodia, indicative of microtubule bundles, greater than a micron in diameter. The functional meaning, interrelationship of these membrane extensions are discussed, along with the significance of these findings for other culture systems such as stem cells. Potential applications of this work include the development of anticancer therapies that target intercellular communication and controlling formation of cancer spheroids for drug testing.

Keywords: intercellular bridges, filopodia, membrane vesicles, intercellular communication, prostate cancer

References

• 1.Kelsell D.P., Dunlop J., Hodgins M.B., Human diseases: clues to cracking the connexin code?, Trends Cell Biol., 11: 2–6, 2001. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
• 2.Rustom A., Saffrich R., Markovic I., Walther P., Gerdes H.‐H., Nanotubular highways for intercellular organelle transport, Science, 303: 1007–1010, 2004. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
• 3.Guo G.‐Q., Zheng G.‐C., Hypotheses for the functions of intercellular bridges in male germ cell development and its cellular mechanisms, J. Theor. Biol., 229: 139–146, 2004. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
• 4.Amat P., Blazquez J.L., Pelaez B., Sanchez A., Amat‐Peral H., Amat‐Peral P., Pastor F.E., Ultrastructural features of rat arcuate nucleus neurons during pregnancy, Ital. J. Anat. Embryol., 103: 311–324, 1998. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
• 5.Stinchcombe J.C., Bossi G., Booth S., Griffiths G.M., The immunological synapse of CTL contains a secretory domain and membrane bridges, Immunity, 15: 751–761, 2001. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
• 6.Walter P., Spermatocytic seminoma. Study of 8 cases and review of the literature, Virchows Arch. A Pathol. Anat. Histol., 386: 175–187, 1980. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
• 7.Dethlefsen S.M., Mulliken J.B., Glowacki J., An ultrastructural study of mast cell interactions in hemangiomas, Ultrastruct. Pathol., 10: 175–183, 1986. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
• 8.Trosko J.E., The role of stem cells and gap junctional intercellular communication in carcinogenesis, J. Biochem. Mol. Biol., 36: 43–48, 2003. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
• 9.Carruba G., Webber M.M., Quader S.T.A., Amoroso M., Cocciadiferro L., Saladino F., Trosko J.E., Castagnetta L.A.M., Regulation of cell‐to‐cell communication in non‐tumorigenic and malignant human prostate epithelial cells, Prostate, 50: 73–82, 2002. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
• 10.Govindarajan R., Zhao S., Song X.H., Guo R.J., Wheelock M., Johnson K.R., Mehta P.P., Impaired trafficking of connexins in androgen‐independent human prostate cancer cell lines and its mitigation by alphacatenin, J. Biol. Chem., 277: 50087–50097, 2002. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
• 11.Tanaka M., Grossman H.B., Connexin 26 induces growth suppression, apoptosis and increased efficacy of doxorubicin in prostate cancer cells, Oncol. Rep., 11: 537–541, 2004. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
• 12.Stone K.R., Mickey D.D., Wunderli H., Mickey G.H., Paulson D.F., Isolation of a human prostate carcinoma cell line (DU 145), Int. J. Cancer, 21: 274–281, 1978. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
• 13.Lelkes P.I., Ramos E., Nikolaychik V.V., Wankowski D.M., Unsworth B.R., Goodwin T.J., GTSF‐2: a new, versatile cell culture medium for diverse normal and transformed mammalian cells, In Vitro Cell. Dev. Biol. Anim., 33: 344–351, 1997. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
• 14.Enmon R.M., O'Connor K.C., Song H., Lacks D.J., Schwartz D.K., Aggregation kinetics of well and poorly differentiated human prostate cancer cells, Biotechnol. Bioeng., 80: 580–588, 2002. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
• 15.Ramírez‐Weber F.‐A., Kornberg T.B., Cytonemes: cellular processes that project to the principal signaling center in Drosophila imaginal discs, Cell, 97: 599–607, 1999. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
• 16.Vasioukhin V., Bauer C., Yin M., Fuchs E., Directed actin polymerization is the driving force for epithelial cell‐cell adhesion, Cell, 100: 209–219, 2000. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
• 17.Hamer G., Roepers‐Gajadien H.L., Gademan I.S., Kal H.B., de Rooij D.G., Intercellular bridges and apoptosis in clones of male germ cells, Int. J. Androl., 26: 348–353, 2003. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
• 18.Ventelä S., Toppari J., Parvinen M., Intercellular organelle traffic through cytoplasmic bridges in early spermatids of the rat: mechanisms of haploid gene product sharing, Mol. Biol. Cell, 14: 2768–2780, 2003. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
• 19.Miething A., The formation and dissolution of the bridge‐partitioning complex in intercellular bidges of dividing germ cells in the testis of the golden hamster, J. Submicrosc. Cytol. Pathol., 35: 271–276, 2003. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
• 20.Kato A., Nagata Y., Todokoroa K., δLD‐Tubulin is a component of intercellular bridges and both the early and mature perinuclear rings during spermatogenesis, Dev. Biol., 269: 196–205, 2004. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
• 21.Weber P.A., Chang, H.C. , Spaeth K.E., Nitsche J.M., Nicholson B.J., The permeability of gap junction channels to probes of different size is dependent on connexin composition and permeant‐pore affinities. Biophys. J., 87: 958–973, 2004. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
• 22.Hecht N.B., Intracellular and intercellular transport of many germ cell mRNAs is mediated by the DNA‐ and RNA‐binding protein, testis‐brain‐RNA‐binding protein (TB‐RBP), Mol. Reprod. Dev., 56: 252–253, 2000. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]