Long-Term Mortality in Nationwide Cohorts of Childhood-Onset Type 1 Diabetes in Japan and Finland (original) (raw)

• Journal List
• HHS Author Manuscripts
• PMC3752687

Diabetes Care. Author manuscript; available in PMC 2013 Aug 26.

Published in final edited form as:

PMCID: PMC3752687

NIHMSID: NIHMS353092

Keiko Asao, MD, MPH,1,2 Cinzia Sarti, MD, PHD,3 Tom Forsen, MD,3,4 Valma Hyttinen, MSC,3 Rimei Nishimura, MD, MPH,1 Masato Matsushima, MD, MPH,5 Antti Reunanen, MD, MPH,6 Jaakko Tuomilehto, MD, MPOLSC, PHD,3,4 and Naoko Tajima, MD1, for the diabetes epidemiology research international (deri) mortality study group

Keiko Asao

1Division of Diabetes and Endocrinology, Department of Internal Medicine, Jikei University School of Medicine, Tokyo, Japan

2Department of Public Health and Environmental Medicine, Jikei University School of Medicine, Tokyo, Japan

Cinzia Sarti

3Diabetes and Genetic Epidemiology Unit, Department of Epidemiology and Health Promotion, National Public Health Institute, Helsinki, Finland

Tom Forsen

3Diabetes and Genetic Epidemiology Unit, Department of Epidemiology and Health Promotion, National Public Health Institute, Helsinki, Finland

4Department of Public Health, University of Helsinki, Helsinki, Finland

Valma Hyttinen

3Diabetes and Genetic Epidemiology Unit, Department of Epidemiology and Health Promotion, National Public Health Institute, Helsinki, Finland

Rimei Nishimura

1Division of Diabetes and Endocrinology, Department of Internal Medicine, Jikei University School of Medicine, Tokyo, Japan

Masato Matsushima

5Department of General Medicine, Jikei University School of Medicine, Tokyo, Japan

Antti Reunanen

6Department of Health and Functional Capacity, National Public Health Institute, Helsinki, Finland

Jaakko Tuomilehto

3Diabetes and Genetic Epidemiology Unit, Department of Epidemiology and Health Promotion, National Public Health Institute, Helsinki, Finland

4Department of Public Health, University of Helsinki, Helsinki, Finland

Naoko Tajima

1Division of Diabetes and Endocrinology, Department of Internal Medicine, Jikei University School of Medicine, Tokyo, Japan

1Division of Diabetes and Endocrinology, Department of Internal Medicine, Jikei University School of Medicine, Tokyo, Japan

2Department of Public Health and Environmental Medicine, Jikei University School of Medicine, Tokyo, Japan

3Diabetes and Genetic Epidemiology Unit, Department of Epidemiology and Health Promotion, National Public Health Institute, Helsinki, Finland

4Department of Public Health, University of Helsinki, Helsinki, Finland

5Department of General Medicine, Jikei University School of Medicine, Tokyo, Japan

6Department of Health and Functional Capacity, National Public Health Institute, Helsinki, Finland

Address correspondence and reprint requests to Naoko Tajima, MD, Division of Diabetes, Metabolism and Endocrinology, Department of Internal Medicine, Jikei University School of Medicine, 3-25-8 Nishishimbashi, Minato-ku, Tokyo 105-8461, pj.ca.iekij@amijatn.napaJ

Abstract

Objective

This study compares mortality from type 1 diabetes in Japan and Finland and examines the effects of sex, age at diagnosis, and calendar time period of diagnosis on mortality.

Research Design and Methods

Patients with type 1 diabetes from Japan (n = 1,408) and Finland (n = 5,126), diagnosed from 1965 through 1979, at age <18 years, were followed until 1994. Mortality was estimated with and without adjustment for that of the general population to assess absolute and relative mortality using Cox proportional hazard models.

Results

Overall mortality rates in Japan and Finland were 607 (95% CI 510–718) and 352 (315–393), respectively, per 100,000 person-years; standardized mortality ratios were 12.9 (10.8–15.3) and 3.7 (3.3–4.1), respectively. Absolute mortality was higher for men than for women in Finland, but relative mortality was higher for women than for men in both cohorts. Absolute mortality was higher in both cohorts among those whose diabetes was diagnosed during puberty, but relative mortality did not show any significant difference by age at diagnosis in either cohort. In Japan, both absolute and relative mortality were higher among those whose diagnosis was in the 1960s rather than the 1970s.

Conclusions

Mortality from type 1 diabetes was higher in Japan compared with Finland. The increased risk of death from type 1 diabetes seems to vary by sex, age at diagnosis, and calendar time period of diagnosis. Further investigation, especially on cause-specific mortality, is warranted in the two countries.

Mortality from childhood-onset type 1 diabetes differs greatly from country to country (1–4). The Diabetes Epidemiology Research International (DERI) Mortality Study Group has previously shown that Japanese patients with type 1 diabetes diagnosed from 1965 through 1979 had higher mortality rates than patients in three other countries: Israel, Finland, and the U.S. (5,6). The greater risk of diabetic renal disease in Japan is one reason for the higher mortality rate (7).

We conducted a follow-up study through 1994 of the Japanese and Finnish cohorts of the original DERI study (5,6) to observe how mortality patterns from type 1 diabetes might have changed with the age of the subjects and longer duration of diabetes. Because some of the subjects had reached their forties, the increasing risk of death unrelated to diabetes could not be ignored. Likewise, with follow-up lasting 25 years, mortality in each country's general population might have changed significantly and have affected the mortality from type 1 diabetes. Therefore, we needed to examine both the absolute and relative mortality of type 1 diabetes. The aims of this extended comparative study were, thus, to compare the mortality of patients with type 1 diabetes in Japan and Finland and to examine the effects of sex, age at diagnosis, and calendar time period of diagnosis on mortality.

Research Design and Methods

Subjects

Inclusion criteria are described in detail elsewhere (5,6). In short, patients were eligible if they 1) had received a diagnosis of diabetes before the age of 18 years, 2) had started insulin treatment within 1 month after diagnosis, and 3) had received a diagnosis of diabetes from 1965 through 1969 and were alive as of 1 January 1970, or had received a diagnosis from 1970 through 1979 and were alive as of 1 January 1980. Patients with Down's syndrome and other congenital diseases commonly associated with diabetes were excluded.

In Japan, patients with type 1 diabetes were identified from nationwide surveys in 1970 (8) and 1981 (9). That cohort consisted of 1,408 patients, 20 fewer than the previously published number, owing to a correction for misclassification and violations of the inclusion criteria discovered during follow-up. In Finland, patients were identified through the National Social Insurance Institution, which registers all people receiving free-of-charge insulin for diabetes (10). The Finnish cohort consisted of 5,126 patients, 22 fewer than the number previously reported because they were found to have Down's syndrome.

Methods of follow-up

The vital statistics of the Japanese patients as of 31 December 1994 were obtained mainly from attending doctors, residence registry, or family registry with the permission of the Ministry of Justice of Japan. The vital statistics of the Finnish patients, also up to 31 December 1994, were obtained by record linkage with the National Death Registry. Since the early 1960s, every Finnish resident has had a personal identification number, which can be found in all formal contacts regarding any issues where personal identification is needed. Vital statuses were obtained for 1,390 patients in Japan (99.7%) and for 5,126 patients in Finland (100%). Mean follow-up periods were 16.3 ± 3.8 (mean ± SD) and 17.8 ± 4.5 patient-years for the Japanese and Finnish cohorts, respectively.

Statistical analyses

Because the Japanese cohort was established from two earlier cross-sectional studies, patients in both cohorts who had received a diagnosis of type 1 diabetes from 1965 through 1969 entered the follow-up study in 1970, and those who had received a diagnosis from 1970 through 1979 entered the follow-up in 1980. Mean duration of diabetes before beginning follow-up was 3.5 ± 2.6 years (mean ± SD) for the Japanese cohort and 4.2 ± 2.8 years for the Finnish cohort. Age at diagnosis was dichotomized— prepubertal age <11 years for girls and <12 years for boys, and pubertal age for older than these ages—as in our previous report (11).

Overall and stratified mortality rates were calculated by deaths per 100,000 person-years. Standardized mortality ratios were also calculated with use of the population mortality statistics for both countries published by the World Health Organization. To calculate the expected number of deaths, the serial mortality rates of the general population specific for countries, 5-year attained age-groups, sex, and 5-year calendar time periods were applied to similarly defined arrays of observed person-years at risk. The 95% CIs for the mortality rates and the standardized mortality ratios were derived with the assumption that deaths occurred with Byar's approximation for a Poisson distribution (12).

Multivariate Cox proportional hazard models were built to evaluate the effects of sex, age at diagnosis, and calendar time period of diagnosis, with adjustments for disease duration before the start of follow-up. Both hazard ratios were calculated without adjustment for the mortality rates of the general population (13). The hazard ratios without adjustment assessed absolute mortality, while those with adjustment assessed relative mortality. The counting process style of input by age and calendar time, both in 5-year segments, was used to include a natural log of the similarly arrayed mortality rate of the general population as a time-dependent offset variable (14). Cumulative survival probability curves were drawn for the stratified cohorts based on the Cox proportional hazard models without adjustment of mortality in general populations.

Statistical modeling and estimations of the parameters were performed with SAS computer software (SAS Institute, Cary, NC). The SAS program used for the Cox proportional hazard model with adjustment for mortality in the general population can be obtained upon request from the corresponding author.

Results

There were 137 deaths (9.7%) in the Japanese cohort and 319 deaths (6.2%) in the Finnish cohort. The overall mortality rate was 607 (95% CI 510–718) per 100,000 person-years for the Japanese patients and 352 (315–393) for the Finnish patients (Table 1). The overall standardized mortality ratio in Japan was 12.9 (10.8–15.3), whereas in Finland it was much lower, at 3.7 (3.3– 4.1). Among the Japanese patients, no sex difference was observed, but in the Finnish cohort, the absolute mortality rate was higher in men than in women. After adjustment for mortality in the general population, women had a lower risk of death in both countries, in contrast to the results for absolute mortality. In both Japan and Finland, absolute mortality was about twice as high among patients whose diabetes was diagnosed in pubertal age rather than in prepubertal age. After adjustment for the mortality rates of the general population, however, this difference remained significant only in the Japanese cohort. Patients in Japan whose diabetes was diagnosed from 1965 through 1969 had a poorer prognosis than those diagnosed from 1975 through 1979. This effect was unchanged in the calculation of the standardized mortality ratio. No calendar time period effect for the time of diagnosis in mortality was observed in the Finnish cohort (Table 1, Fig. 1).

A– C: Stratified cumulative-predicted survival probabilities in the Japanese and Finnish cohorts. The predicted survival probabilities were calculated with the Cox hazard models and stratified by sex, age at diagnosis, and calendar time period of diagnosis in each cohort. A: Stratified cumulative-predicted survival probabilities by sex. B: Stratified cumulative-predicted survival probabilities by age at diagnosis (prepubertal age versus pubertal age: ≥ 11 years old for women and ≥12 years old for men). C: Stratified cumulative-predicted survival probabilities by calendar time period of diagnosis. The survival curves for those with diabetes diagnosed in 1970–1974 are not shown in C because they had a longer duration of diabetes before starting follow-up than did those with diabetes diagnosed in 1965–1969 and 1975–1979. To draw the predicted survival curves, the proportions of sex, age at diagnosis (prepubertal age versus pubertal age), and calendar time period of diagnosis (1965–1969, 1970–1974, and 1975–1979), as well as the mean years before entering the follow-up in the combined sample of the two cohorts, were applied as covariates of the models.

Table 1

Overall and stratified mortality rates and standardized mortality ratios

Multivariate Cox proportional hazards models showed that in Japan the risk of death was 1.94 times higher in patients with diabetes diagnosed in pubertal age than in those with diagnoses in prepubertal age. It also showed that the risk was 3.12 times higher for those with diagnoses in the 1960s than for those with diagnoses in the 1970s. In Finland, the risk of death was 1.93 times higher in men than in women, and 1.62 times higher for patients with diabetes diagnosed in pubertal age than for those diagnosed in prepubertal age. After adjustment for mortality rates in the general population, the effect of diagnosis during the earlier calendar time period remained significant in the Japanese cohort (hazards ratio 2.25). In addition, the effect of sex appeared. The mortality rate in men was lower than that in women (hazards ratio 0.52). For the Finnish cohort, the effect of sex was inverted after adjustment for the mortality rates of the general population: namely, men had lower mortality rates than women (hazards ratio 0.63). The effect of diagnosis in pubertal age was no longer significant after adjustment for mortality in the general population in both cohorts (Table 2).

Table 2

Multivariate Cox proportional hazard models*

Conclusions

Our study evaluated absolute and relative mortality of type 1 diabetes and compared the effects of sex, age at diagnosis, and calendar time period of diagnosis in Japan and Finland, countries with very different incidences of type 1 diabetes. The study cohorts were a nationwide series, and the study itself was the longest follow-up of an unselected cohort of patients with type 1 diabetes. The duration of follow-up was 15–29 years. Absolute mortality in type 1 diabetes in Japan was almost twice that in Finland. Adjustment to the mortality rates of the populations only emphasized the difference: mortality in the cohort with type 1 diabetes was 3.7 times higher than that in the general population in Finland and almost 13 times higher in Japan.

In the Japanese cohort, sex did not affect absolute mortality, but women had a higher relative mortality. In the Finnish cohort, men had a higher absolute mortality but women had a higher relative mortality. Overall, the relative effect of diabetes was greater in women than in men in both countries. In the background population of this generation in both countries, women have lower mortality rates than men. These observations suggest possible mechanisms protecting women that diminish if they develop diabetes. Several studies (15–20) have suggested that diabetes is a greater risk factor for atherosclerosis in women than in men. In addition, several reports show a higher frequency of albuminuria in women with diabetes than in men (21,22). The risk factors for coronary artery disease, but not its incidence rates, may differ between men and women with type 1 diabetes (23). Diabetic neuropathy, thought to be related to increased mortality (24–26), might develop more often in women (27,28). However, the finding of a greater relative mortality among women compared with men needs to be evaluated, especially for cause-specific mortality, since sex differences in the mortality of patients with type 1 diabetes have been inconsistent in previous studies (29–34).

Patients in both Japan and Finland with diagnoses during pubertal age had higher absolute mortality than patients diagnosed in prepubertal age. However, the effect of age at diagnosis on the risk of death did not remain significant after being adjusted for mortality in the general population in both cohorts. Possible explanations for the adverse effects of diagnosis in pubertal age include the heterogeneity of the etiology of diabetes (35–37) and psychosocial problems during pubertal age. However, recent studies have shown the importance of prepubertal, as well as pubertal and postpubertal, duration of diabetes for diabetic nephropathy and retinopathy (21,22,38). Our results suggest that the diagnosis of type 1 diabetes in pubertal age might be a risk factor for mortality, but that the risk can be partly explained by higher age attained, which, in general, means higher mortality during the long follow-up.

In Japan, patients with diabetes diagnosed in the 1960s had higher absolute and relative mortality than patients diagnosed in the 1970s. The lower hazard ratio for those in Japan diagnosed in 1970–1974 than that for those diagnosed in 1975–1979 might be an underestimation due to a possible low detection of early deceased cases. Absolute and relative mortality can be decreased by improved care for diabetes and a more supportive socioeconomic environment. Much emphasis has been placed on the diabetes care system in Finland because of its very high incidence of type 1 diabetes (39). Finland has had a nationally organized diabetes care system since the 1960s, free-of-charge insulin since 1965, and the first national management guidelines for diabetes were published in 1975. In contrast, the health care system for type 1 diabetes in Japan was poorly developed before the 1980s (40), at least partially because Japan has an extremely low incidence of type 1 diabetes (39). Improved glycemic and blood pressure controls, as well as improved treatment of acute complications, might have effectively reduced mortality in Japan (41,42). Although Japanese patients with diabetes diagnosed in the 1960s should also have benefited from these recent advances in diabetes care in Japan, absolute and relative mortality in type 1 diabetes diagnosed in the 1960s was significantly higher than that diagnosed in the 1970s. It is possible that the adverse effects of poor diabetes control in the early stages of the disease might affect mortality over a long period. Studies in several other countries have shown a reduction of absolute and relative mortality over time (2,4,15,18).

In conclusion, mortality from type 1 diabetes was higher in Japan compared with Finland. This effect seems to vary by sex, age at diagnosis, and calendar time period of diagnosis. From clinical and public health points of view, mortality of the general population should be taken into account when determining both the magnitude of the risk of death related to diabetes and the reasons for the increased risk. To answer these questions, we will continue our international comparative study. Cause-specific mortality in the two countries is still under investigation.

Acknowledgments

This work was supported by National Institute of Health Grant DK-35905 and the Health Science Research Grant for the Research for Children and Families (H10-Kodomo-022) from the Ministry of Health and Welfare, Japan. The Finnish part of the study was supported by the Finnish Academy (grant nos. 38387 and 46558) and the Novo Nordisk Foundation. The Ministry of Health and Welfare, Japan, also supported K.A. as a research resident.

Data for the national mortality in Japan and Finland were obtained from the World Health Organization, World Health Statistics Annual 1972, 1979, 1981, 1984, 1985, 1988, 1989, and 1993.

Abbreviations

Appendix

DERI Mortality Study Group

Japan: N. Tajima, N. Fukushima, S. Harada, T. Toyota, S. Konda, T. Urakami, Y. Uchi-gata, N. Hotta, G. Isshiki, A. Takeda, Y. Kaino, Y. Nakamura, T. Jinnouchi, M. Matsushima, R. Nishimura, T. Kawamura, and K. Asao. Finland: J. Tuomilehto, C. Sarti, T. Forsen, V. Hytti-nen, and A. Reunanen.

Footnotes

A table elsewhere in this issue shows conventional and Système International (SI) units and conversion factors for many substances.

References

1. Dorman JS, Laporte RE, Kuller LH, Cruickshanks KJ, Orchard TJ, Wagener DK, Becker DJ, Cavender DE, Drash AL. The Pittsburgh insulin-dependent diabetes mellitus (IDDM) morbidity and mortality study: mortality results. Diabetes. 1984;33:271–276. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

2. Borch-Johnsen K, Kreiner S, Deckert T. Mortality of type 1 (insulin-dependent) diabetes mellitus in Denmark: a study of relative mortality in 2930 Danish type 1 diabetic patients diagnosed from 1933 to 1972. Diabetologia. 1986;29:767–772. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

3. Green A, Borch-Johnsen K, Andersen PK, Hougaard P, Keiding N, Kreiner S, Deckert T. Relative mortality of type 1 (insulin-dependent) diabetes in Denmark: 1933–1981. Diabetologia. 1985;28:339–342. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

4. McNally PG, Raymond NT, Burden ML, Burton PR, Botha JL, Swift PG, Burden AC, Hearnshaw JR. Trends in mortality of childhood-onset insulin-dependent diabetes mellitus in Leicestershire: 1940–1991. Diabet Med. 1995;12:961–966. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

5. Diabetes Epidemiology Research International Mortality Study Group. Major cross-country differences in risk of dying for people with IDDM. Diabetes Care. 1991;14:49–54. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

6. The Diabetes Epidemiology Research International (DERI) Study. International analysis of insulin-dependent diabetes mellitus mortality: a preventable mortality perspective. Am J Epidemiol. 1995;142:612–618. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

7. Matsushima M, Tajima N, Laporte RE, Orchard TJ, Tull ES, Gower IF, Kitagawa T the Diabetes Epidemiology Research International (DERI) U.S.-Japan Mortality Study Group. Markedly increased renal disease mortality and incidence of renal replacement therapy among IDDM patients in Japan in contrast to Allegheny County, Pennsylvania, USA. Diabetologia. 1995;38:236–243. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

8. Miki E, Maruyama H. Juvenile-onset diabetes mellitus in Japan: the results of the first nation-wide survey (in Japanese) J Jpn Diabetes Soc. 1972;15:38–42. [Google Scholar]

9. Hibi I, Isshiki G, Kitagawa T, Tsuchiya Y, Maruyama H, Matuura N, Tanae A. Report of the Research Committee on the Childhood Chronic Disease (Endocrinology, Metabolism, Hematology) (in Japanese) Tokyo, Japan: Ministry of Health and Welfare; 1981. Research on the guideline for patient education and treatment for juvenile-onset diabetes mellitus; pp. 233–244. [Google Scholar]

10. Tuomilehto J, Rewers M, Reunanen A, Lounamaa P, Lounamaa R, Tuomilehto-Wolf E, Akerblom HK. Increasing trend in type 1 (insulin-dependent) diabetes mellitus in childhood in Finland: analysis of age, calendar time and birth cohort effects during 1965 to 1984. Diabetologia. 1991;34:282–287. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

11. Nishimura R, Tajima N, Matsushima M, Laporte RE the Diabetes Epidemiology Research International Study Group. Puberty, IDDM, and death in Japan. Diabetes Care. 1998;21:1674–1679. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

12. Breslow NE, Day NE. Rates and rate standardization. In: Heseltine E, editor. Statistical Methods In Cancer Research: The Design And Analysis Of Cohort Studies. Vol. 2. Lyon, France: International Agency For Research On Cancer; 1987. pp. 47–79. [Google Scholar]

13. Andersen PK, Borch-Johnsen K, Deckert T, Green A, Hougaard P, Keiding N, Kreiner S. A Cox regression model for the relative mortality and its application to diabetes mellitus survival data. Biometrics. 1985;41:921–932. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

14. SAS Institute. Change and Enhancements Through Version Release 6.11. Cary, NC: SAS Institute; 1996. The PHREG procedure; pp. 807–884. [Google Scholar]

15. Kannel WB, McGee DL. Diabetes and cardiovascular disease: the Framingham study. JAMA. 1979;241:2035–2038. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

16. Heyden S, Heiss G, Bartel AG, Hames CG. Sex differences in coronary mortality among diabetics in Evans County, Georgia. J Chronic Dis. 1980;33:265–273. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

17. Barrett-Connor E, Wingard DL. Sex differential in ischemic heart disease mortality in diabetics: a prospective population-based study. Am J Epidemiol. 1983;118:489–496. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

18. Lerner DJ, Kannel WB. Patterns of coronary heart disease morbidity and mortality in the sexes: a 26-year follow-up of the Framingham population. Am Heart J. 1986;111:383–390. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

19. Bell DS: Stroke in the diabetic patient. Diabetes Care. 1994;17:213–219. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

20. Colhoun HM, Rubens MB, Underwood SR, Fuller JH. The effect of type 1 diabetes mellitus on the gender difference in coronary artery calcification. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2000;36:2160–2167. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

21. Schultz CJ, Konopelska-Bahu T, Dalton RN, Carroll TA, Stratton I, Gale EA, Neil A, Dunger DB the Oxford Regional Prospective Study Group. Microalbuminuria prevalence varies with age, sex, and puberty in children with type 1 diabetes followed from diagnosis in a longitudinal study. Diabetes Care. 1999;22:495–502. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

22. Holl RW, Grabert M, Thon A, Heinze E. Urinary excretion of albumin in adolescents with type 1 diabetes: persistent versus intermittent microalbuminuria and relationship to duration of diabetes, sex, and metabolic control. Diabetes Care. 1999;22:1555–1560. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

23. Lloyd CE, Kuller LH, Ellis D, Becker DJ, Wing RR, Orchard TJ. Coronary artery disease in IDDM: gender differences in risk factors but not risk. Arterioscler Thromb Vasc Biol. 1996;16:720–726. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

24. Veglio M, Sivieri R, Chinaglia A, Scaglione L, Cavallo-Perin P. the Neuropathy Study Group of the Italian Society of the Study of Diabetes, Piemonte Affiliate: QT interval prolongation and mortality in type 1 diabetic patients: a 5-year cohort prospective study. Diabetes Care. 2000;23:1381–1383. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

25. Rathmann W, Ziegler D, Jahnke M, Haastert B, Gries FA. Mortality in diabetic patients with cardiovascular autonomic neuropathy. Diabet Med. 1993;10:820–824. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

26. Kleiger RE, Miller JP, Bigger JT, Jr, Moss AJ. Decreased heart rate variability and its association with increased mortality after acute myocardial infarction. Am J Cardiol. 1987;59:256–262. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

27. Christen WG, Manson JE, Bubes V, Glynn RJ the Sorbinil Retinopathy Trial Research Group. Risk factors for progression of distal symmetric polyneuropathy in type 1 diabetes mellitus. Am J Epidemiol. 1999;150:1142–1151. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

28. Forrest KY, Maser RE, Pambianco G, Becker DJ, Orchard TJ. Hypertension as a risk factor for diabetic neuropathy: a prospective study. Diabetes. 1997;46:665–670. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

29. Joner G, Patrick S. The mortality of children with type 1 (insulin-dependent) diabetes mellitus in Norway, 1973–1988. Diabetologia. 1991;34:29–32. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

30. Chang YF, Laporte RE. Calendar time trends of the insulin-dependent diabetes mellitus mortality in Allegheny county, Pennsylvania. Diabetes Res Clin Pract. 1996;34(Suppl):S141–S146. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

31. Rossing P, Hougaard P, Borch-Johnsen K, Parving HH. Predictors of mortality in insulin dependent diabetes: 10 year observational follow up study. BMJ. 1996;313:779–784. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

32. Robinson N, Lloyd CE, Stevens LK. Social deprivation and mortality in adults with diabetes mellitus. Diabet Med. 1998;15:205–212. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

33. The DCCT Research Group. Factors in development of diabetic neuropathy: baseline analysis of neuropathy in feasibility phase of Diabetes Control and Complications Trial (DCCT) Diabetes. 1988;37:476–481. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

34. Laing SP, Swerdlow AJ, Slater SD, Botha JL, Burden AC, Waugh NR, Smith AW, Hill RD, Bingley PJ, Patterson CC, Qiao Z, Keen H The British Diabetic Association Cohort Study. I All-cause mortality in patients with insulin-treated diabetes mellitus. Diabet Med. 1999;16:459–465. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

35. Arslanian SA, Becker DJ, Rabin B, Atchison R, Eberhardt M, Cavender D, Dorman J, Drash AL. Correlates of insulin antibodies in newly diagnosed children with insulin-dependent diabetes before insulin therapy. Diabetes. 1985;34:926–930. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

36. Vandewalle CL, Falorni A, Svanholm S, Lernmark A, Pipeleers DG, Gorus FK The Belgian Diabetes Registry. High diagnostic sensitivity of glutamate decarboxylase autoantibodies in insulin-dependent diabetes mellitus with clinical onset between age 20 and 40 years. J Clin Endocrinol Metab. 1995;80:846–851. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

37. Yokota I, Shirakawa N, Shima K, Matsuda J, Naito E, Ito M, Kuroda Y. Relationship between GAD antibody and residual β-cell function in children after overt onset of IDDM. Diabetes Care. 1996;19:74–75. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

38. Holl RW, Lang GE, Grabert M, Heinze E, Lang GK, Debatin KM. Diabetic retinopathy in pediatric patients with type-1 diabetes: effect of diabetes duration, prepubertal and pubertal onset of diabetes, and metabolic control. J Pediatr. 1998;132:790–794. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

39. Karvonen M, Viik-Kajander M, Moltchanova E, Libman I, LaPorte R, Tuomilehto J Diabetes Mondiale (DiaMond) Project Group. Incidence of childhood type 1 diabetes worldwide. Diabetes Care. 2000;23:1516–1526. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

40. Nishimura R, Matsushima M, Tajima N, Agata T, Shimizu H, Laporte RE the Diabetes Epidemiology Research International Study Group. A major improvement in the prognosis of individuals with IDDM in the past 30 years in Japan. Diabetes Care. 1996;19:758–760. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

41. Borch-Johnsen K, Kreiner S, Deckert T. Diabetic nephropathy—susceptible to care? A cohort-study of 641 patients with type 1 (insulin-dependent) diabetes. Diabetes Res. 1986;3:397–400. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

42. Wetterhall SF, Olson DR, DeStefano F, Stevenson JM, Ford ES, German RR, Will JC, Newman JM, Sepe SJ, Vinicor F. Trends in diabetes and diabetic complications, 1980–1987. Diabetes Care. 1992;15:960–967. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]