Gram-positive sepsis. Mechanisms and differences from gram-negative sepsis - PubMed (original) (raw)

Review

Gram-positive sepsis. Mechanisms and differences from gram-negative sepsis

S Sriskandan et al. Infect Dis Clin North Am. 1999 Jun.

Abstract

This article has reviewed the mechanisms by which gram-positive bacteria lead to septic shock, with regard to bacterial structure and toxicology and the host responses elicited both in animal models and in the clinical setting. Gram-positive organisms are better suited to invade host tissues and elicit, in general, a brisker phagocytic response than gram-negative organisms. The lack of endotoxin in the outer cell wall is compensated for by the presence of exposed peptidoglycan and a range of other toxic secreted products. It appears that cell wall components of gram-positive bacteria may signal via the same receptor as gram-negative endotoxin, although the type of signal and coreceptor may differ. Both animal and clinical data suggest that, unlike endotoxin-mediated shock, gram-positive infection produces a modest TNF response only and does not respond well to anti-TNF therapies. This leads one to conclude that the mechanisms leading to shock in gram-positive infection may be multifactorial and perhaps more difficult to treat. A thorough review of gram-positive mechanisms of sepsis is hampered by a lack of basic research in this field. Understanding of gram-negative bacterial structure and the regulation of virulence genes is at an advanced stage, yet the molecular tools to analyse virulence factors in the gram-positive genome have only recently become available. There is a paucity of good animal models of gram-positive infection and a lack of microbiologic data from some of the major trials in sepsis that might have given greater insight into the mechanisms leading to shock in various infections.

PubMed Disclaimer

Similar articles

Cited by

Publication types

MeSH terms

Substances

LinkOut - more resources