Counterpoint: bias from population stratification is not a major threat to the validity of conclusions from epidemiological studies of common polymorphisms and cancer - PubMed (original) (raw)

Affiliations

• PMID: 12050091

Editorial

Counterpoint: bias from population stratification is not a major threat to the validity of conclusions from epidemiological studies of common polymorphisms and cancer

Sholom Wacholder et al. Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev. 2002 Jun.

No abstract available

PubMed Disclaimer

Comment on

• Point: population stratification: a problem for case-control studies of candidate-gene associations?
  Thomas DC, Witte JS. Thomas DC, et al. Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev. 2002 Jun;11(6):505-12. Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev. 2002. PMID: 12050090 No abstract available.

Similar articles

• Point: population stratification: a problem for case-control studies of candidate-gene associations?
  Thomas DC, Witte JS. Thomas DC, et al. Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev. 2002 Jun;11(6):505-12. Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev. 2002. PMID: 12050090 No abstract available.
• Strategic issues in the design and interpretation of studies on metabolic polymorphisms and cancer.
  Vineis P, Malats N. Vineis P, et al. IARC Sci Publ. 1999;(148):51-61. IARC Sci Publ. 1999. PMID: 10493248 Review.
• Bias as a threat to the validity of cancer molecular-marker research.
  Ransohoff DF. Ransohoff DF. Nat Rev Cancer. 2005 Feb;5(2):142-9. doi: 10.1038/nrc1550. Nat Rev Cancer. 2005. PMID: 15685197 Review.
• Use of elderly tumor-free subjects as a "supercontrol" for cancer epidemiological studies: pros and cons.
  Imyanitov EN. Imyanitov EN. Mech Ageing Dev. 2009 Jan-Feb;130(1-2):122-7. doi: 10.1016/j.mad.2008.03.005. Epub 2008 Mar 25. Mech Ageing Dev. 2009. PMID: 18456307 Review.
• [Classification bias in epidemiological studies].
  Zieliński A. Zieliński A. Przegl Epidemiol. 2008;62(2):461-70. Przegl Epidemiol. 2008. PMID: 18807495 Polish.

Cited by

• Adjusting for principal components can induce spurious associations in genome-wide association studies in admixed populations.
  Grinde KE, Browning BL, Reiner AP, Thornton TA, Browning SR. Grinde KE, et al. bioRxiv [Preprint]. 2024 Apr 3:2024.04.02.587682. doi: 10.1101/2024.04.02.587682. bioRxiv. 2024. PMID: 38617337 Free PMC article. Preprint.
• Association of glutamate receptor gene polymorphisms with attention-deficit hyperactivity disorder susceptibility: a systematic review and meta-analysis.
  Zou D, Zeng Q, Liu P, Wei Y, Guo R, Zhu Y, He RR. Zou D, et al. Front Genet. 2024 Mar 13;15:1348387. doi: 10.3389/fgene.2024.1348387. eCollection 2024. Front Genet. 2024. PMID: 38544802 Free PMC article. Review.
• Genetic and epigenetic effects on couple adjustment in context of romantic relationship: A scoping systematic review.
  Khani P, Ansari Dezfouli M, Nasri F, Rahemi M, Ahmadloo S, Afkhami H, Saeidi F, Tereshchenko S, Bigdeli MR, Modarressi MH. Khani P, et al. Front Genet. 2023 Jan 24;14:1002048. doi: 10.3389/fgene.2023.1002048. eCollection 2023. Front Genet. 2023. PMID: 36816018 Free PMC article.
• Trade-offs of Linear Mixed Models in Genome-Wide Association Studies.
  Wang H, Aragam B, Xing EP. Wang H, et al. J Comput Biol. 2022 Mar;29(3):233-242. doi: 10.1089/cmb.2021.0157. Epub 2022 Feb 25. J Comput Biol. 2022. PMID: 35230156 Free PMC article.
• Performance of model-based multifactor dimensionality reduction methods for epistasis detection by controlling population structure.
  Abegaz F, Van Lishout F, Mahachie John JM, Chiachoompu K, Bhardwaj A, Duroux D, Gusareva ES, Wei Z, Hakonarson H, Van Steen K. Abegaz F, et al. BioData Min. 2021 Feb 19;14(1):16. doi: 10.1186/s13040-021-00247-w. BioData Min. 2021. PMID: 33608043 Free PMC article.

Publication types

MeSH terms