Creation of a gold standard for validation of a computer-interpretable depression screening guideline - PubMed (original) (raw)
Affiliations
- PMID: 17102225
Creation of a gold standard for validation of a computer-interpretable depression screening guideline
Jeeyae Choi et al. Stud Health Technol Inform. 2006.
Abstract
Clinical practice guidelines (CPGs) are common tools for clinicians in daily practice. In order to use CPGs effectively at the point of care, representing CPGs into computer-interpretable format is essential. Since computer-interpretable guidelines (CIGs) have been reported to increase clinicians' usage of guidelines and improve patient's outcomes, it is critical to validate health care knowledge translated from CPGs into CIGs. A comprehensive method of developing and evaluating a gold standard for a depression screening CIG was performed and analyzed in this study. GLIF encoding was conducted for a depression screening CPG and 21 clinical scenarios were created based on the encoded depression screening CIG. Two nurse practitioners were recruited to generate initial management for each scenario. Proficiency and efficiency scores were calculated for each scenario. In 13 of 21 scenarios, both experts had proficiency scores of 100%. Proficiency scores were lowest for scenarios that included bipolar disease. Implications of our findings for development of a gold standard are discussed.
Similar articles
- Encoding a clinical practice guideline using guideline interchange format: a case study of a depression screening and management guideline.
Choi J, Currie LM, Wang D, Bakken S. Choi J, et al. Int J Med Inform. 2007 Oct;76 Suppl 2:S302-7. doi: 10.1016/j.ijmedinf.2007.05.011. Epub 2007 Jun 27. Int J Med Inform. 2007. PMID: 17600762 - Encoding a depression screening guideline using GLIF.
Choi J, Sapp J, Bakken S. Choi J, et al. Stud Health Technol Inform. 2006;122:905-6. Stud Health Technol Inform. 2006. PMID: 17102456 - Comparison of primary care expert and computer-interpretable depression screening guideline recommendations.
Choi J, Bakken S. Choi J, et al. AMIA Annu Symp Proc. 2006;2006:887. AMIA Annu Symp Proc. 2006. PMID: 17238506 Free PMC article. - Computer-interpretable clinical practice guidelines. Where are we and where are we going ?
Sonnenberg FA, Hagerty CG. Sonnenberg FA, et al. Yearb Med Inform. 2006:145-58. Yearb Med Inform. 2006. PMID: 17051309 Review. - Computer-interpretable clinical guidelines: a methodological review.
Peleg M. Peleg M. J Biomed Inform. 2013 Aug;46(4):744-63. doi: 10.1016/j.jbi.2013.06.009. Epub 2013 Jun 25. J Biomed Inform. 2013. PMID: 23806274 Review.
Cited by
- Development of a smartphone application for clinical-guideline-based obesity management.
Jeon E, Park HA. Jeon E, et al. Healthc Inform Res. 2015 Jan;21(1):10-20. doi: 10.4258/hir.2015.21.1.10. Epub 2015 Jan 31. Healthc Inform Res. 2015. PMID: 25705553 Free PMC article. - Development of the IMB Model and an Evidence-Based Diabetes Self-management Mobile Application.
Jeon E, Park HA. Jeon E, et al. Healthc Inform Res. 2018 Apr;24(2):125-138. doi: 10.4258/hir.2018.24.2.125. Epub 2018 Apr 30. Healthc Inform Res. 2018. PMID: 29770246 Free PMC article.
Publication types
MeSH terms
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Medical