Initiation of oral contraceptives using a quick start compared with a conventional start: a randomized controlled trial - PubMed (original) (raw)
Randomized Controlled Trial
Initiation of oral contraceptives using a quick start compared with a conventional start: a randomized controlled trial
Carolyn Westhoff et al. Obstet Gynecol. 2007 Jun.
Abstract
Objective: To estimate whether young women taking the first pill on the day of prescription had higher continuation rates and lower pregnancy rates than women who waited until menses to start the oral contraceptive pill (OCP).
Methods: We recruited 1,716 women aged younger than 25 years seeking to initiate the oral contraceptive at three publicly funded family planning clinics, and randomly assigned them to conventional initiation of the pill (conventional start) or immediate, directly observed ingestion of the first pill (quick start) during the clinic visit. Women underwent follow-up interviews at 3 and 6 months.
Results: Sixty percent of participants discontinued the pill, and 8% became pregnant during follow-up. Women who took the first pill in the clinic were more likely to continue to the second OCP pack (odds ratio 1.5, 95% confidence interval 1.0-2.1.); however, the Quick Start approach did not improve OCP continuation rates at 3 and 6 months. Those assigned to Quick Start were slightly less likely to become pregnant within 6 months from the time they started the pill (hazard ratio 0.90, 95% confidence interval 0.64-1.25). Eighty-one percent of women rated the Quick Start approach as acceptable or preferable to waiting. Rates of serious adverse events were low and similar in the two groups.
Conclusion: Protocols that require a woman to wait until the next menses to start hormonal contraceptives are an obstacle to contraceptive initiation. Directly observed, immediate initiation of the pill improves short-term continuation.
Clinical trial registration: ClinicalTrials.gov, www.clinicaltrials.gov, NCT00068848
Comment in
- Ensuring the future of family planning: the move toward excellence in contraceptive research.
Espey E. Espey E. Obstet Gynecol. 2007 Jun;109(6):1266-7. doi: 10.1097/01.AOG.0000267115.59222.d6. Obstet Gynecol. 2007. PMID: 17540795 No abstract available. - Starting oral contraceptives immediately or during next menses did not differ for continued contraceptive use or pregnancy at 6 months.
Schaefer KM. Schaefer KM. Evid Based Nurs. 2008 Jan;11(1):10. doi: 10.1136/ebn.11.1.10. Evid Based Nurs. 2008. PMID: 18192515 No abstract available.
Similar articles
- Effect of "observed start" vs. traditional "Sunday start" on hormonal contraceptive continuation rates after medical abortion.
Bednarek PH, Nichols MD, Carlson N, Edelman AB, Creinin MD, Truitt S, Jensen JT. Bednarek PH, et al. Contraception. 2008 Jul;78(1):26-30. doi: 10.1016/j.contraception.2008.02.012. Epub 2008 May 6. Contraception. 2008. PMID: 18555814 Clinical Trial. - Initiation of oral contraceptives--start now!
Edwards SM, Zieman M, Jones K, Diaz A, Robilotto C, Westhoff C. Edwards SM, et al. J Adolesc Health. 2008 Nov;43(5):432-6. doi: 10.1016/j.jadohealth.2008.06.008. J Adolesc Health. 2008. PMID: 18848670 Clinical Trial. - Same-day initiation of the transdermal hormonal delivery system (contraceptive patch) versus traditional initiation methods.
Murthy AS, Creinin MD, Harwood B, Schreiber CA. Murthy AS, et al. Contraception. 2005 Nov;72(5):333-6. doi: 10.1016/j.contraception.2005.05.009. Epub 2005 Aug 9. Contraception. 2005. PMID: 16246657 Clinical Trial. - [Individualization of low-dose oral contraceptives. Pharmacological principles and practical indications for oral contraceptives].
Cianci A, De Leo V. Cianci A, et al. Minerva Ginecol. 2007 Aug;59(4):415-25. Minerva Ginecol. 2007. PMID: 17923832 Review. Italian. - When can a woman start combined hormonal contraceptives (CHCs)? A systematic review.
Brahmi D, Curtis KM. Brahmi D, et al. Contraception. 2013 May;87(5):524-38. doi: 10.1016/j.contraception.2012.09.010. Epub 2012 Nov 12. Contraception. 2013. PMID: 23153903 Review.
Cited by
- One-year contraceptive continuation and pregnancy in adolescent girls and women initiating hormonal contraceptives.
Raine TR, Foster-Rosales A, Upadhyay UD, Boyer CB, Brown BA, Sokoloff A, Harper CC. Raine TR, et al. Obstet Gynecol. 2011 Feb;117(2 Pt 1):363-371. doi: 10.1097/AOG.0b013e31820563d3. Obstet Gynecol. 2011. PMID: 21252751 Free PMC article. - Combination contraceptives: effects on weight.
Gallo MF, Lopez LM, Grimes DA, Carayon F, Schulz KF, Helmerhorst FM. Gallo MF, et al. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2014 Jan 29;2014(1):CD003987. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD003987.pub5. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2014. PMID: 24477630 Free PMC article. Review. - Contraception for Adolescents.
Todd N, Black A. Todd N, et al. J Clin Res Pediatr Endocrinol. 2020 Feb 6;12(Suppl 1):28-40. doi: 10.4274/jcrpe.galenos.2019.2019.S0003. J Clin Res Pediatr Endocrinol. 2020. PMID: 32041390 Free PMC article. - The Contraceptive CHOICE Project: reducing barriers to long-acting reversible contraception.
Secura GM, Allsworth JE, Madden T, Mullersman JL, Peipert JF. Secura GM, et al. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2010 Aug;203(2):115.e1-7. doi: 10.1016/j.ajog.2010.04.017. Epub 2010 Jun 11. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2010. PMID: 20541171 Free PMC article. - Effectiveness and Harms of Contraceptive Counseling and Provision Interventions for Women : A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis.
Nelson HD, Cantor A, Jungbauer RM, Eden KB, Darney B, Ahrens K, Burgess A, Atchison C, Goueth R, Fu R. Nelson HD, et al. Ann Intern Med. 2022 Jul;175(7):980-993. doi: 10.7326/M21-4380. Epub 2022 May 24. Ann Intern Med. 2022. PMID: 35605239 Free PMC article. Review.
Publication types
MeSH terms
Substances
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Medical