Evaluating maternity care: a core set of outcome measures - PubMed (original) (raw)

Evaluating maternity care: a core set of outcome measures

Declan Devane et al. Birth. 2007 Jun.

Abstract

Background: Comparing the relative effectiveness of interventions on specific outcomes across trials can be problematic due to differences in the choice and definitions of outcome measures used by researchers. We sought to identify a minimum set of outcome measures for evaluating models of maternity care from the perspective of key stakeholders.

Methods: A 3-round, electronic Delphi survey design was used. Setting was multinational, comprising a range of key stakeholders. Participants consisted of a single heterogeneous panel of maternity service users, midwives, obstetricians, pediatricians/neonatologists, family physicians/general practitioners, policy-makers, service practitioners, and researchers of maternity care. Members of the panel self-assessed their expertise in evaluating models of maternity care.

Results: A total of 320 people from 28 countries expressed willingness to take part in this survey. Round 1 was completed by 218 (68.1%) participants, of whom 173 (79.4%) completed round 2 and 152 (87.9%) of these completed round 3. Fifty outcomes were identified, with both a mean value greater than the overall group mean for all outcomes combined (x=4.18) and rated 4 or more on a 5-point Likert-type scale for importance of inclusion in a minimum data set of outcome measures by at least 70 percent of respondents. Three outcomes were collapsed into a single outcome so that the final minimum set includes 48 outcomes.

Conclusions: Given the inconsistencies in the choice of outcome measures routinely collected and reported in randomized evaluations of maternity care, it is hoped that use of the data set will increase the potential for national and international comparisons of models for maternity care. Although not intended to be prescriptive or to inhibit the collection of other outcomes, we hope that the core set will make it easier to assess the care of women and their babies during pregnancy and childbirth.

PubMed Disclaimer

Similar articles

• Developing a set of consensus indicators to support maternity service quality improvement: using Core Outcome Set methodology including a Delphi process.
  Bunch KJ, Allin B, Jolly M, Hardie T, Knight M. Bunch KJ, et al. BJOG. 2018 Nov;125(12):1612-1618. doi: 10.1111/1471-0528.15282. Epub 2018 Jun 14. BJOG. 2018. PMID: 29770557 Free PMC article.
• The future of Cochrane Neonatal.
  Soll RF, Ovelman C, McGuire W. Soll RF, et al. Early Hum Dev. 2020 Nov;150:105191. doi: 10.1016/j.earlhumdev.2020.105191. Epub 2020 Sep 12. Early Hum Dev. 2020. PMID: 33036834
• Using a quality care framework to evaluate user and provider experiences of maternity care: A comparative study.
  Symon A, McFadden A, White M, Fraser K, Cummins A. Symon A, et al. Midwifery. 2019 Jun;73:17-25. doi: 10.1016/j.midw.2019.03.001. Epub 2019 Mar 5. Midwifery. 2019. PMID: 30856527
• The Canadian Birth Place Study: describing maternity practice and providers' exposure to home birth.
  Vedam S, Schummers L, Stoll K, Rogers J, Klein MC, Fairbrother N, Dharamsi S, Liston R, Chong GK, Kaczorowski J. Vedam S, et al. Midwifery. 2012 Oct;28(5):600-8. doi: 10.1016/j.midw.2012.06.011. Epub 2012 Aug 25. Midwifery. 2012. PMID: 22925396
• Consensus on Outcome Measures for Glaucoma Effectiveness Trials: Results From a Delphi and Nominal Group Technique Approaches.
  Ismail R, Azuara-Blanco A, Ramsay CR. Ismail R, et al. J Glaucoma. 2016 Jun;25(6):539-46. doi: 10.1097/IJG.0000000000000301. J Glaucoma. 2016. PMID: 26091178

Cited by

• Core outcome sets and trial registries.
  Clarke M, Williamson P. Clarke M, et al. Trials. 2015 May 14;16:216. doi: 10.1186/s13063-015-0738-6. Trials. 2015. PMID: 25971905 Free PMC article.
• Participation in obstetrical studies is associated with improved pregnancy outcomes.
  Cozzi GD, Jauk VC, Szychowski JM, Tita AT, Battarbee AN, Subramaniam A. Cozzi GD, et al. Am J Obstet Gynecol MFM. 2022 Nov;4(6):100729. doi: 10.1016/j.ajogmf.2022.100729. Epub 2022 Aug 19. Am J Obstet Gynecol MFM. 2022. PMID: 35995368 Free PMC article.
• Fetal and umbilical Doppler ultrasound in high-risk pregnancies.
  Alfirevic Z, Stampalija T, Gyte GM. Alfirevic Z, et al. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2013 Nov 12;2013(11):CD007529. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD007529.pub3. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2013. PMID: 24222334 Free PMC article. Updated. Review.
• Fetal and umbilical Doppler ultrasound in high-risk pregnancies.
  Alfirevic Z, Stampalija T, Dowswell T. Alfirevic Z, et al. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2017 Jun 13;6(6):CD007529. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD007529.pub4. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2017. PMID: 28613398 Free PMC article. Review.
• Synthesis and summary of patient-reported outcome measures to inform the development of a core outcome set in colorectal cancer surgery.
  McNair AG, Whistance RN, Forsythe RO, Rees J, Jones JE, Pullyblank AM, Avery KN, Brookes ST, Thomas MG, Sylvester PA, Russell A, Oliver A, Morton D, Kennedy R, Jayne DG, Huxtable R, Hackett R, Dutton SJ, Coleman MG, Card M, Brown J, Blazeby JM; CONSENSUS-CRC (Core Outcomes and iNformation SEts iN SUrgical Studies - ColoRectal Cancer) Working Group. McNair AG, et al. Colorectal Dis. 2015 Nov;17(11):O217-29. doi: 10.1111/codi.13021. Colorectal Dis. 2015. PMID: 26058878 Free PMC article. Review.

Publication types

MeSH terms

LinkOut - more resources

• Full Text Sources

  • Ovid Technologies, Inc.
  • Wiley