The perverse effects of competition on scientists' work and relationships - PubMed (original) (raw)

The perverse effects of competition on scientists' work and relationships

Melissa S Anderson et al. Sci Eng Ethics. 2007 Dec.

Abstract

Competition among scientists for funding, positions and prestige, among other things, is often seen as a salutary driving force in U.S. science. Its effects on scientists, their work and their relationships are seldom considered. Focus-group discussions with 51 mid- and early-career scientists, on which this study is based, reveal a dark side of competition in science. According to these scientists, competition contributes to strategic game-playing in science, a decline in free and open sharing of information and methods, sabotage of others' ability to use one's work, interference with peer-review processes, deformation of relationships, and careless or questionable research conduct. When competition is pervasive, such effects may jeopardize the progress, efficiency and integrity of science.

PubMed Disclaimer

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Chron High Educ. 2004 Jan 9;50(18):A28-9 - PubMed
    1. Science. 2004 Feb 20;303(5661):1105 - PubMed
    1. JAMA. 2005 Sep 21;294(11):1390-3 - PubMed
    1. Science. 2001 Dec 14;294(5550):2293-4 - PubMed
    1. Acad Med. 2001 Oct;76(10):1005-12 - PubMed

Publication types

MeSH terms

LinkOut - more resources