Atherosclerosis inflammation imaging with 18F-FDG PET: carotid, iliac, and femoral uptake reproducibility, quantification methods, and recommendations - PubMed (original) (raw)
Atherosclerosis inflammation imaging with 18F-FDG PET: carotid, iliac, and femoral uptake reproducibility, quantification methods, and recommendations
James H F Rudd et al. J Nucl Med. 2008 Jun.
Free article
Abstract
Atherosclerosis imaging with 18F-FDG PET is useful for tracking inflammation within plaque and monitoring the response to drug therapy. Short-term reproducibility of this technique in peripheral artery disease has not been assessed, and the optimal method of 18F-FDG quantification is still debated. We imaged 20 patients with vascular disease using 18F-FDG PET twice, 14 d apart, and used these data to assess reproducibility measures and compare 2 methods of 18F-FDG uptake measurement. We also reviewed the literature on quantification methods to determine the optimal measures of arterial 18F-FDG uptake for future studies.
Methods: Twenty patients with vascular disease underwent PET/CT of the iliac, femoral, and carotid arteries 90 min after 18F-FDG administration. In 19 patients, repeat testing was performed at 2 wk. Coregistration and attenuation correction were performed with CT. Vessel 18F-FDG uptake was measured as both the mean and maximum blood-normalized standardized uptake value (SUV), known as the target-to-background ratio (TBR). We assessed interscan, interobserver, and intraobserver agreement.
Results: Nineteen patients completed both imaging sessions. The carotid and peripheral arteries all have excellent short-term reproducibility of the 18F-FDG signal, with intraclass correlation coefficients all greater than 0.8 for all measures of reproducibility. Both mean and maximum TBR measurements for quantifying 18F-FDG uptake are equally reproducible. 18F-FDG uptake was significantly higher in the carotid arteries than in both iliac and femoral vessels (P < 0.001 for both).
Conclusion: We found that both mean and maximum TBR in the carotid, iliac, and femoral arteries were highly reproducible. We suggest the mean TBR be used for tracking systemic arterial therapies, whereas the maximum TBR is optimal for detecting and monitoring local, plaque-based therapy.
Similar articles
- Assessment of inflammation in large arteries with 18F-FDG-PET in elderly.
Orellana MR, Bentourkia M, Sarrhini O, Fulop T, Paquet N, Lavallée É, Turcotte É, Khalil A. Orellana MR, et al. Comput Med Imaging Graph. 2013 Oct-Dec;37(7-8):459-65. doi: 10.1016/j.compmedimag.2013.09.006. Epub 2013 Oct 5. Comput Med Imaging Graph. 2013. PMID: 24148785 - Higher reliability of 18F-FDG target background ratio compared to standardized uptake value in vulnerable carotid plaque detection: a pilot study.
Niccoli Asabella A, Ciccone MM, Cortese F, Scicchitano P, Gesualdo M, Zito A, Di Palo A, Angiletta D, Regina G, Marzullo A, Rubini G. Niccoli Asabella A, et al. Ann Nucl Med. 2014 Jul;28(6):571-9. doi: 10.1007/s12149-014-0850-9. Epub 2014 Apr 16. Ann Nucl Med. 2014. PMID: 24737136 - Thresholds for Arterial Wall Inflammation Quantified by 18F-FDG PET Imaging: Implications for Vascular Interventional Studies.
van der Valk FM, Verweij SL, Zwinderman KA, Strang AC, Kaiser Y, Marquering HA, Nederveen AJ, Stroes ES, Verberne HJ, Rudd JH. van der Valk FM, et al. JACC Cardiovasc Imaging. 2016 Oct;9(10):1198-1207. doi: 10.1016/j.jcmg.2016.04.007. Epub 2016 Sep 14. JACC Cardiovasc Imaging. 2016. PMID: 27639759 Free PMC article. - Variability and uncertainty of 18F-FDG PET imaging protocols for assessing inflammation in atherosclerosis: suggestions for improvement.
Huet P, Burg S, Le Guludec D, Hyafil F, Buvat I. Huet P, et al. J Nucl Med. 2015 Apr;56(4):552-9. doi: 10.2967/jnumed.114.142596. Epub 2015 Feb 26. J Nucl Med. 2015. PMID: 25722452 Review. - Molecular imaging of carotid artery atherosclerosis with PET: a systematic review.
Piri R, Gerke O, Høilund-Carlsen PF. Piri R, et al. Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging. 2020 Jul;47(8):2016-2025. doi: 10.1007/s00259-019-04622-y. Epub 2019 Nov 30. Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging. 2020. PMID: 31786626 Review.
Cited by
- Optimizing FDG-PET/CT imaging of inflammation in atherosclerosis.
Saraste A, Knuuti J. Saraste A, et al. J Nucl Cardiol. 2015 Jun;22(3):480-2. doi: 10.1007/s12350-015-0112-9. Epub 2015 Mar 31. J Nucl Cardiol. 2015. PMID: 25824017 No abstract available. - Cardiovascular molecular imaging: the road ahead.
Majmudar MD, Nahrendorf M. Majmudar MD, et al. J Nucl Med. 2012 May;53(5):673-6. doi: 10.2967/jnumed.111.099838. Epub 2012 Apr 9. J Nucl Med. 2012. PMID: 22492729 Free PMC article. Review. - Monitoring plaque inflammation in atherosclerotic rabbits with an iron oxide (P904) and (18)F-FDG using a combined PET/MR scanner.
Millon A, Dickson SD, Klink A, Izquierdo-Garcia D, Bini J, Lancelot E, Ballet S, Robert P, Mateo de Castro J, Corot C, Fayad ZA. Millon A, et al. Atherosclerosis. 2013 Jun;228(2):339-45. doi: 10.1016/j.atherosclerosis.2013.03.019. Epub 2013 Mar 26. Atherosclerosis. 2013. PMID: 23582588 Free PMC article. - Simultaneous carotid PET/MR: feasibility and improvement of magnetic resonance-based attenuation correction.
Bini J, Eldib M, Robson PM, Calcagno C, Fayad ZA. Bini J, et al. Int J Cardiovasc Imaging. 2016 Jan;32(1):61-71. doi: 10.1007/s10554-015-0661-7. Epub 2015 Apr 22. Int J Cardiovasc Imaging. 2016. PMID: 25898892 Free PMC article. - Unexpected arterial wall and cellular inflammation in patients with rheumatoid arthritis in remission using biological therapy: a cross-sectional study.
Bernelot Moens SJ, van der Valk FM, Strang AC, Kroon J, Smits LP, Kneepkens EL, Verberne HJ, van Buul JD, Nurmohamed MT, Stroes ES. Bernelot Moens SJ, et al. Arthritis Res Ther. 2016 May 21;18(1):115. doi: 10.1186/s13075-016-1008-z. Arthritis Res Ther. 2016. PMID: 27209093 Free PMC article.
Publication types
MeSH terms
Substances
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Other Literature Sources
Medical