Lack of effectiveness of cellulose sulfate gel for the prevention of vaginal HIV transmission - PubMed (original) (raw)

Randomized Controlled Trial

. 2008 Jul 31;359(5):463-72.

doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa0707957.

Roshini Govinden, Florence M Mirembe, Fernand Guédou, Suniti Solomon, Marissa L Becker, B S Pradeep, A K Krishnan, Michel Alary, Bina Pande, Gita Ramjee, Jennifer Deese, Tania Crucitti, Doug Taylor; CS Study Group

Collaborators, Affiliations

Free article

Randomized Controlled Trial

Lack of effectiveness of cellulose sulfate gel for the prevention of vaginal HIV transmission

Lut Van Damme et al. N Engl J Med. 2008.

Free article

Erratum in

Abstract

Background: Women make up more than 50% of adults living with human immunodeficiency virus (HIV) infection or the acquired immunodeficiency syndrome (AIDS) in sub-Saharan Africa. Thus, female-initiated HIV prevention methods are urgently needed.

Methods: We performed a randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial of cellulose sulfate, an HIV-entry inhibitor formulated as a vaginal gel, involving women at high risk for HIV infection at three African and two Indian sites. The primary end point was newly acquired infection with HIV type 1 or 2. The secondary end point was newly acquired gonococcal or chlamydial infection. The primary analysis was based on a log-rank test of no difference in the distribution of time to HIV infection, stratified according to site.

Results: A total of 1398 women were enrolled and randomly assigned to receive cellulose sulfate gel (706 participants) or placebo (692 participants) and had follow-up HIV test data. There were 41 newly acquired HIV infections, 25 in the cellulose sulfate group and 16 in the placebo group, with an estimated hazard ratio of infection for the cellulose sulfate group of 1.61 (P=0.13). This result, which is not significant, is in contrast to the interim finding that led to the trial being stopped prematurely (hazard ratio, 2.02 [corrected]; P=0.05 [corrected]) and the suggestive result of a preplanned secondary (adherence-based) analysis (hazard ratio, 2.02; P=0.05). No significant effect of cellulose sulfate as compared with placebo was found on the risk of gonorrheal infection (hazard ratio, 1.10; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.74 to 1.62) or chlamydial infection (hazard ratio, 0.71; 95% CI, 0.47 to 1.08).

Conclusions: Cellulose sulfate did not prevent HIV infection and may have increased the risk of HIV acquisition. (ClinicalTrials.gov number, NCT00153777; and Current Controlled Trials number, ISRCTN95638385.)

2008 Massachusetts Medical Society

PubMed Disclaimer

Comment in

Similar articles

Cited by

Publication types

MeSH terms

Substances

LinkOut - more resources