Amygdala response to sucrose consumption is inversely related to artificial sweetener use - PubMed (original) (raw)
Amygdala response to sucrose consumption is inversely related to artificial sweetener use
K J Rudenga et al. Appetite. 2012 Apr.
Abstract
Controversy exists over whether exposure to artificial sweeteners degrades the predictive relationship between sweet taste and its post-ingestive consequences. Here we tested whether brain response to caloric sucrose is influenced by individual differences in self-reported artificial sweetener use. Twenty-six subjects participated in fMRI scanning while consuming sucrose solutions. A negative correlation between artificial sweetener use and amygdala response to sucrose ingestion was observed. This finding supports the hypothesis that artificial sweetener use may be associated with brain changes that could influence eating behavior.
Copyright © 2011 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.
Conflict of interest statement
Conflict of Interest
The authors declare that they have no competing financial conflicts of interest.
Figures
Figure 1. Relationship between amygdala and insula response to sweet taste and artificial sweetener use
Coronal sections showing the regions of insula and amygdala in which response to sweet taste vs. tasteless (contrast of SS -tls) correlates with artificial sweetener use. The graphs show parameter estimates at the peak voxel in the circled region for the contrast of SS-tls plotted against NQ Artificial Sweetener Use scores. The color bar represents the T-scale for the activations shown. Images are displayed at p≤0.005 and k≥5 voxels. Post-hoc tests showed the strength of this correlation in the peak voxel to be r2=0.43 (amygdala) and r2=0.38 (insula). * The figure has been updated to reflect the analysis with covariates
Similar articles
- Sucrose compared with artificial sweeteners: different effects on ad libitum food intake and body weight after 10 wk of supplementation in overweight subjects.
Raben A, Vasilaras TH, Møller AC, Astrup A. Raben A, et al. Am J Clin Nutr. 2002 Oct;76(4):721-9. doi: 10.1093/ajcn/76.4.721. Am J Clin Nutr. 2002. PMID: 12324283 - Caloric labels do not influence taste pleasantness and neural responses to erythritol and sucrose.
Budzinska A, Byl L, Teysseire F, Flad E, Dupont P, Wölnerhanssen B, Meyer-Gerspach AC, Van Oudenhove L, Weltens N. Budzinska A, et al. Neuroimage. 2025 Mar;308:121061. doi: 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2025.121061. Epub 2025 Jan 28. Neuroimage. 2025. PMID: 39884412 - Altered processing of sweet taste in the brain of diet soda drinkers.
Green E, Murphy C. Green E, et al. Physiol Behav. 2012 Nov 5;107(4):560-7. doi: 10.1016/j.physbeh.2012.05.006. Epub 2012 May 11. Physiol Behav. 2012. PMID: 22583859 Free PMC article. - Effect of consuming different caloric sweeteners on bone health and possible mechanisms.
Tsanzi E, Fitch CW, Tou JC. Tsanzi E, et al. Nutr Rev. 2008 Jun;66(6):301-9. doi: 10.1111/j.1753-4887.2008.00037.x. Nutr Rev. 2008. PMID: 18522618 Review. - Usefulness of artificial sweeteners for body weight control.
St-Onge MP, Heymsfield SB. St-Onge MP, et al. Nutr Rev. 2003 Jun;61(6 Pt 1):219-21. doi: 10.1301/nr.2003.jun.219-221. Nutr Rev. 2003. PMID: 12903832 Review.
Cited by
- Intense Sweeteners, Appetite for the Sweet Taste, and Relationship to Weight Management.
Bellisle F. Bellisle F. Curr Obes Rep. 2015 Mar;4(1):106-10. doi: 10.1007/s13679-014-0133-8. Curr Obes Rep. 2015. PMID: 26005598 Free PMC article. Review. - SWEET MAPS: A Conceptualization of Low-Calorie Sweetener Consumption Among Young Adults.
Visek AJ, Blake EF, Otterbein M, Chandran A, Sylvetsky AC. Visek AJ, et al. Curr Dev Nutr. 2018 Dec 24;3(4):nzy103. doi: 10.1093/cdn/nzy103. eCollection 2019 Apr. Curr Dev Nutr. 2018. PMID: 30937422 Free PMC article. - Neural vulnerability factors that increase risk for future weight gain.
Stice E, Yokum S. Stice E, et al. Psychol Bull. 2016 May;142(5):447-71. doi: 10.1037/bul0000044. Epub 2016 Feb 8. Psychol Bull. 2016. PMID: 26854866 Free PMC article. Review. - Dissecting ultra-processed foods and drinks: Do they have a potential to impact the brain?
Contreras-Rodriguez O, Solanas M, Escorihuela RM. Contreras-Rodriguez O, et al. Rev Endocr Metab Disord. 2022 Aug;23(4):697-717. doi: 10.1007/s11154-022-09711-2. Epub 2022 Feb 2. Rev Endocr Metab Disord. 2022. PMID: 35107734 Review. - Intake of non-nutritive sweeteners is associated with an unhealthy lifestyle: a cross-sectional study in subjects with morbid obesity.
Winther R, Aasbrenn M, Farup PG. Winther R, et al. BMC Obes. 2017 Dec 27;4:41. doi: 10.1186/s40608-017-0177-x. eCollection 2017. BMC Obes. 2017. PMID: 29299330 Free PMC article.
References
- Bartoshuk L, Duffy V, Fast K, Green BG, Prutkin J, Snyder D. Labeled scales (eg., category, Likert, VAS) and invalid across-group comparisons: what we have learned from genetic variation in taste. Food Quality and Preference. 2003;14(2):125–138.
- Bellisle F, Drewnowski A. Intense sweeteners, energy intake and the control of body weight. Eur J Clin Nutr. 2007;61(6):691–700. - PubMed
- Benton D. Can artificial sweeteners help control body weight and prevent obesity? Nutrition Research Reviews. 2005;18(1):63–76. - PubMed
- Bernal S, Dostova I, Kest A, Abayev Y, Kandova E, Touzani K, Sclafani A, et al. Role of dopamine D1 and D2 receptors in the nucleus accumbens shell on the acquisition and expression of fructose-conditioned flavor-flavor preferences in rats. Behavioural Brain Research. 2008;190(1):59–66. - PMC - PubMed
Publication types
MeSH terms
Substances
Grants and funding
- F31 DC010557/DC/NIDCD NIH HHS/United States
- R01 DC006706/DC/NIDCD NIH HHS/United States
- R01 DK085579/DK/NIDDK NIH HHS/United States
- F31-DC010557-01/DC/NIDCD NIH HHS/United States
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources