Amygdala response to sucrose consumption is inversely related to artificial sweetener use - PubMed (original) (raw)
Amygdala response to sucrose consumption is inversely related to artificial sweetener use
K J Rudenga et al. Appetite. 2012 Apr.
Abstract
Controversy exists over whether exposure to artificial sweeteners degrades the predictive relationship between sweet taste and its post-ingestive consequences. Here we tested whether brain response to caloric sucrose is influenced by individual differences in self-reported artificial sweetener use. Twenty-six subjects participated in fMRI scanning while consuming sucrose solutions. A negative correlation between artificial sweetener use and amygdala response to sucrose ingestion was observed. This finding supports the hypothesis that artificial sweetener use may be associated with brain changes that could influence eating behavior.
Copyright © 2011 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.
Conflict of interest statement
Conflict of Interest
The authors declare that they have no competing financial conflicts of interest.
Figures
Figure 1. Relationship between amygdala and insula response to sweet taste and artificial sweetener use
Coronal sections showing the regions of insula and amygdala in which response to sweet taste vs. tasteless (contrast of SS -tls) correlates with artificial sweetener use. The graphs show parameter estimates at the peak voxel in the circled region for the contrast of SS-tls plotted against NQ Artificial Sweetener Use scores. The color bar represents the T-scale for the activations shown. Images are displayed at p≤0.005 and k≥5 voxels. Post-hoc tests showed the strength of this correlation in the peak voxel to be r2=0.43 (amygdala) and r2=0.38 (insula). * The figure has been updated to reflect the analysis with covariates
Similar articles
- Sucrose compared with artificial sweeteners: different effects on ad libitum food intake and body weight after 10 wk of supplementation in overweight subjects.
Raben A, Vasilaras TH, Møller AC, Astrup A. Raben A, et al. Am J Clin Nutr. 2002 Oct;76(4):721-9. doi: 10.1093/ajcn/76.4.721. Am J Clin Nutr. 2002. PMID: 12324283 - Use of caloric and noncaloric sweeteners in US consumer packaged foods, 2005-2009.
Ng SW, Slining MM, Popkin BM. Ng SW, et al. J Acad Nutr Diet. 2012 Nov;112(11):1828-34.e1-6. doi: 10.1016/j.jand.2012.07.009. J Acad Nutr Diet. 2012. PMID: 23102182 Free PMC article. - Altered processing of sweet taste in the brain of diet soda drinkers.
Green E, Murphy C. Green E, et al. Physiol Behav. 2012 Nov 5;107(4):560-7. doi: 10.1016/j.physbeh.2012.05.006. Epub 2012 May 11. Physiol Behav. 2012. PMID: 22583859 Free PMC article. - Effect of consuming different caloric sweeteners on bone health and possible mechanisms.
Tsanzi E, Fitch CW, Tou JC. Tsanzi E, et al. Nutr Rev. 2008 Jun;66(6):301-9. doi: 10.1111/j.1753-4887.2008.00037.x. Nutr Rev. 2008. PMID: 18522618 Review. - Usefulness of artificial sweeteners for body weight control.
St-Onge MP, Heymsfield SB. St-Onge MP, et al. Nutr Rev. 2003 Jun;61(6 Pt 1):219-21. doi: 10.1301/nr.2003.jun.219-221. Nutr Rev. 2003. PMID: 12903832 Review.
Cited by
- Food Addiction, High-Glycemic-Index Carbohydrates, and Obesity.
Lennerz B, Lennerz JK. Lennerz B, et al. Clin Chem. 2018 Jan;64(1):64-71. doi: 10.1373/clinchem.2017.273532. Epub 2017 Nov 20. Clin Chem. 2018. PMID: 29158252 Free PMC article. Review. - The Impact of Artificial Sweeteners on Human Health and Cancer Association: A Comprehensive Clinical Review.
Ghusn W, Naik R, Yibirin M. Ghusn W, et al. Cureus. 2023 Dec 29;15(12):e51299. doi: 10.7759/cureus.51299. eCollection 2023 Dec. Cureus. 2023. PMID: 38288206 Free PMC article. Review. - Neuroimaging and neuromodulation approaches to study eating behavior and prevent and treat eating disorders and obesity.
Val-Laillet D, Aarts E, Weber B, Ferrari M, Quaresima V, Stoeckel LE, Alonso-Alonso M, Audette M, Malbert CH, Stice E. Val-Laillet D, et al. Neuroimage Clin. 2015 Mar 24;8:1-31. doi: 10.1016/j.nicl.2015.03.016. eCollection 2015. Neuroimage Clin. 2015. PMID: 26110109 Free PMC article. Review. - Low Calorie Sweeteners Differ in Their Physiological Effects in Humans.
Hunter SR, Reister EJ, Cheon E, Mattes RD. Hunter SR, et al. Nutrients. 2019 Nov 9;11(11):2717. doi: 10.3390/nu11112717. Nutrients. 2019. PMID: 31717525 Free PMC article. Review. - Differential Cerebral Gustatory Responses to Sucrose, Aspartame, and Stevia Using Gustatory Evoked Potentials in Humans.
Mouillot T, Parise A, Greco C, Barthet S, Brindisi MC, Penicaud L, Leloup C, Brondel L, Jacquin-Piques A. Mouillot T, et al. Nutrients. 2020 Jan 27;12(2):322. doi: 10.3390/nu12020322. Nutrients. 2020. PMID: 32012665 Free PMC article.
References
- Bartoshuk L, Duffy V, Fast K, Green BG, Prutkin J, Snyder D. Labeled scales (eg., category, Likert, VAS) and invalid across-group comparisons: what we have learned from genetic variation in taste. Food Quality and Preference. 2003;14(2):125–138.
- Bellisle F, Drewnowski A. Intense sweeteners, energy intake and the control of body weight. Eur J Clin Nutr. 2007;61(6):691–700. - PubMed
- Benton D. Can artificial sweeteners help control body weight and prevent obesity? Nutrition Research Reviews. 2005;18(1):63–76. - PubMed
- Bernal S, Dostova I, Kest A, Abayev Y, Kandova E, Touzani K, Sclafani A, et al. Role of dopamine D1 and D2 receptors in the nucleus accumbens shell on the acquisition and expression of fructose-conditioned flavor-flavor preferences in rats. Behavioural Brain Research. 2008;190(1):59–66. - PMC - PubMed
Publication types
MeSH terms
Substances
Grants and funding
- F31-DC010557-01/DC/NIDCD NIH HHS/United States
- R01 DK085579-03/DK/NIDDK NIH HHS/United States
- R01 DC006706-05/DC/NIDCD NIH HHS/United States
- F31 DC010557/DC/NIDCD NIH HHS/United States
- R01 DC006706/DC/NIDCD NIH HHS/United States
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources