The efficacy of intrauterine devices for emergency contraception: a systematic review of 35 years of experience - PubMed (original) (raw)

Review

The efficacy of intrauterine devices for emergency contraception: a systematic review of 35 years of experience

Kelly Cleland et al. Hum Reprod. 2012 Jul.

Abstract

Background: Intrauterine devices (IUDs) have been studied for use for emergency contraception for at least 35 years. IUDs are safe and highly effective for emergency contraception and regular contraception, and are extremely cost-effective as an ongoing method. The objective of this study was to evaluate the existing data to estimate the efficacy of IUDs for emergency contraception.

Methods: The reference list for this study was generated from hand searching the reference lists of relevant articles and our own article archives, and electronic searches of several databases: Medline, Global Health, Clinicaltrials.gov, Popline, Wanfang Data (Chinese) and Weipu Data (Chinese). We included studies published in English or Chinese, with a defined population of women who presented for emergency contraception and were provided with an IUD, and in which the number of pregnancies was ascertained and loss to follow-up was clearly defined. Data from each article were abstracted independently by two reviewers.

Results: The 42 studies (of 274 retrieved) that met our inclusion criteria were conducted in six countries between 1979 and 2011 and included eight different types of IUD and 7034 women. The maximum timeframe from intercourse to insertion of the IUD ranged from 2 days to 10 or more days; the majority of insertions (74% of studies) occurred within 5 days of intercourse. The pregnancy rate (excluding one outlier study) was 0.09%.

Conclusions: IUDs are a highly effective method of contraception after unprotected intercourse. Because they are safe for the majority of women, highly effective and cost-effective when left in place as ongoing contraception, whenever clinically feasible IUDs should be included in the range of emergency contraception options offered to patients presenting after unprotected intercourse. This review is limited by the fact that the original studies did not provide sufficient data on the delay between intercourse and insertion of the IUD, parity, cycle day of intercourse or IUD type to allow analysis by any of these variables.

PubMed Disclaimer

Comment in

• Intrauterine devices provide safe and effective contraception following unprotected intercourse and beyond.
  Bond S. Bond S. J Midwifery Womens Health. 2012 Sep-Oct;57(5):524-5. doi: 10.1111/j.1542-2011.2012.00219_3.x. J Midwifery Womens Health. 2012. PMID: 22954085 No abstract available.

Similar articles

• Progestin intrauterine devices versus copper intrauterine devices for emergency contraception.
  Ramanadhan S, Goldstuck N, Henderson JT, Che Y, Cleland K, Dodge LE, Edelman A. Ramanadhan S, et al. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2023 Feb 27;2(2):CD013744. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD013744.pub2. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2023. PMID: 36847591 Free PMC article.
• Canadian Contraception Consensus (Part 2 of 4).
  Black A, Guilbert E; Co-Authors; Costescu D, Dunn S, Fisher W, Kives S, Mirosh M, Norman WV, Pymar H, Reid R, Roy G, Varto H, Waddington A, Wagner MS, Whelan AM; Special Contributors; Ferguson C, Fortin C, Kielly M, Mansouri S, Todd N. Black A, et al. J Obstet Gynaecol Can. 2015 Nov;37(11):1033-9. doi: 10.1016/s1701-2163(16)30054-8. J Obstet Gynaecol Can. 2015. PMID: 26629725 English, French.
• Canadian Contraception Consensus (Part 1 of 4).
  Black A, Guilbert E; Co-Authors; Costescu D, Dunn S, Fisher W, Kives S, Mirosh M, Norman WV, Pymar H, Reid R, Roy G, Varto H, Waddington A, Wagner MS, Whelan AM; Special Contributors; Ferguson C, Fortin C, Kielly M, Mansouri S, Todd N; Society of Obstetricians and Gynaecologists of Canada. Black A, et al. J Obstet Gynaecol Can. 2015 Oct;37(10):936-42. doi: 10.1016/s1701-2163(16)30033-0. J Obstet Gynaecol Can. 2015. PMID: 26606712 English, French.
• Levonorgestrel vs. Copper Intrauterine Devices for Emergency Contraception.
  Turok DK, Gero A, Simmons RG, Kaiser JE, Stoddard GJ, Sexsmith CD, Gawron LM, Sanders JN. Turok DK, et al. N Engl J Med. 2021 Jan 28;384(4):335-344. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa2022141. N Engl J Med. 2021. PMID: 33503342 Free PMC article. Clinical Trial.
• Interventions for emergency contraception.
  Cheng L, Gülmezoglu AM, Oel CJ, Piaggio G, Ezcurra E, Look PF. Cheng L, et al. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2004;(3):CD001324. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD001324.pub2. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2004. PMID: 15266446 Updated. Review.

Cited by

• Recent advances in contraception.
  Aiken AR, Trussell J. Aiken AR, et al. F1000Prime Rep. 2014 Dec 1;6:113. doi: 10.12703/P6-113. eCollection 2014. F1000Prime Rep. 2014. PMID: 25580267 Free PMC article. Review.
• One-year continuation of copper or levonorgestrel intrauterine devices initiated at the time of emergency contraception.
  Sanders JN, Turok DK, Royer PA, Thompson IS, Gawron LM, Storck KE. Sanders JN, et al. Contraception. 2017 Aug;96(2):99-105. doi: 10.1016/j.contraception.2017.05.012. Epub 2017 Jun 5. Contraception. 2017. PMID: 28596121 Free PMC article.
• Pulmonary Hypertension in Pregnancy: A Review.
  Anjum H, Surani S. Anjum H, et al. Medicina (Kaunas). 2021 Mar 11;57(3):259. doi: 10.3390/medicina57030259. Medicina (Kaunas). 2021. PMID: 33799910 Free PMC article. Review.
• Contraception During Perimenopause: Practical Guidance.
  Grandi G, Di Vinci P, Sgandurra A, Feliciello L, Monari F, Facchinetti F. Grandi G, et al. Int J Womens Health. 2022 Jul 15;14:913-929. doi: 10.2147/IJWH.S288070. eCollection 2022. Int J Womens Health. 2022. PMID: 35866143 Free PMC article. Review.
• Role of the community pharmacist in emergency contraception counseling and delivery in the United States: current trends and future prospects.
  Rafie S, Stone RH, Wilkinson TA, Borgelt LM, El-Ibiary SY, Ragland D. Rafie S, et al. Integr Pharm Res Pract. 2017 Mar 23;6:99-108. doi: 10.2147/IPRP.S99541. eCollection 2017. Integr Pharm Res Pract. 2017. PMID: 29354556 Free PMC article. Review.

References

1. 1. ACOG Practice Bulletin. Clinical management guidelines for obstetrician-gynecologists. Number 112, emergency contraception. Obstet Gynecol. 2010;115:1100–1108. - PubMed
2. 1. Askalani AH, Al-Senity AM, Al-Agizy HM, Salem HI, Al-Masry GI, El-Sadek SM. Evaluation of copper T-200 as a post-coital contraceptive. Egypt Obstet Gynecol. 1987;13:63–66.
3. 1. Bharadwaj P, Saxton J, Mann S, Jungmann E, Stephenson J. What influences young women to choose between the emergency contraceptive pill and an intrauterine device? A qualitative study. Eur J Contracept Reprod Health Care. 2011;16:201–209. - PubMed
4. 1. Black TRL, Goldstuck ND, Spence A. Post-coital intrauterine device insertion—a further evaluation. Contraception. 1980;22:653–658. - PubMed
5. 1. Bromwich PD, Parsons AD. The establishment of a postcoital contraception service. Br J Fam Plan. 1982;8:16–19.

Publication types

MeSH terms

Substances

LinkOut - more resources

• Full Text Sources

  • Europe PubMed Central
  • Ovid Technologies, Inc.
  • PubMed Central
  • Silverchair Information Systems

• Other Literature Sources

  • H1 Connect

• Miscellaneous

  • NCI CPTAC Assay Portal