Physical activity during life course and bone mass: a systematic review of methods and findings from cohort studies with young adults - PubMed (original) (raw)

Review

Physical activity during life course and bone mass: a systematic review of methods and findings from cohort studies with young adults

Renata M Bielemann et al. BMC Musculoskelet Disord. 2013.

Abstract

Background: The purpose of this paper was to review the literature of the cohort studies which evaluated the association between physical activity during the life course and bone mineral content or density in young adults.

Methods: Prospective cohort studies with bone mineral density or content measured in the whole body, lumbar spine and femoral neck by dual energy x-ray absorptiometry as outcome and physical activity as exposure were searched. Two independent reviewers selected studies retrieved from electronic databases (Medline, Lilacs, Web of Science and Scielo) and reviewed references of all selected full text articles. Downs & Black criterion was used in the quality assessment of these studies.

Results: Nineteen manuscripts met inclusion criteria. Lumbar spine was the skeletal site most studied (n = 15). Different questionnaires were used for physical activity evaluation. Peak strain score was also used to evaluate physical activity in 5 manuscripts. Lack of statistical power calculation was the main problem found in the quality assessment. Positive associations between physical activity and bone mass were found more in males than in females; in weight bearing anatomical sites (lumbar spine and femoral neck) than in total body and when physical activity measurements were done from adolescence to adulthood - than when evaluated in only one period. Physical activity during growth period was associated with greater bone mass in males. It was not possible to conduct pooled analyses due to the heterogeneity of the studies, considering mainly the different instruments used for physical activity measurements.

Conclusions: Physical activity seems to be important for bone mass in all periods of life, but especially the growth period should be taking into account due to its important direct effect on bone mass and its influence in physical activity practice in later life. Low participation in peak strain activities may also explain the lower number of associations found in females.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

Figure 1

Figure 1

Flow diagram of study selection.

Figure 2

Figure 2

Number of studies according to the association between general physical activity and bone mass by sex and period of physical activity measurement. Criterion for positive association was the presence of at least one positive association between physical activity with at least one anatomical site (total body, lumbar spine or femoral neck). *Only first published manuscripts with the studied samples were included.

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. U.S. Department of Health and Human Services. Book Bone Health and Osteoporosis: a report of the Surgeon General. Washington, D.C.: Public Health Service, Office of the Surgeon General; 2004. Bone Health and Osteoporosis: a report of the Surgeon General. Rockville, MD.
    1. World Health Organization. Book WHO Scientific Group on the Assessment of Osteoporosis at Primary Health Care Level. Geneva: World Health Organization; 2007. WHO Scientific Group on the Assessment of Osteoporosis at Primary Health Care Level.
    1. Heaney RP, Abrams S, Dawson-Hughes B, Looker A, Marcus R, Matkovic V, Weaver C. Peak bone mass. Osteoporos Int. 2000;11:985–1009. - PubMed
    1. Bailey CA, Brooke-Wavell K. Exercise for optimising peak bone mass in women. Proc Nutr Soc. 2008;67:9–18. doi: 10.1017/S0029665108005971. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Guadalupe-Grau A, Fuentes T, Guerra B, Calbet JA. Exercise and bone mass in adults. Sports Med. 2009;39:439–468. doi: 10.2165/00007256-200939060-00002. - DOI - PubMed

Publication types

MeSH terms

LinkOut - more resources