Gene × environment interaction studies have not properly controlled for potential confounders: the problem and the (simple) solution - PubMed (original) (raw)

Review

Gene × environment interaction studies have not properly controlled for potential confounders: the problem and the (simple) solution

Matthew C Keller. Biol Psychiatry. 2014.

Abstract

Candidate gene × environment (G × E) interaction research tests the hypothesis that the effects of some environmental variable (e.g., childhood maltreatment) on some outcome measure (e.g., depression) depend on a particular genetic polymorphism. Because this research is inherently nonexperimental, investigators have been rightly concerned that detected interactions could be driven by confounders (e.g., ethnicity, gender, age, socioeconomic status) rather than by the specified genetic or environmental variables per se. In an attempt to eliminate such alternative explanations for detected G × E interactions, investigators routinely enter the potential confounders as covariates in general linear models. However, this practice does not control for the effects these variables might have on the G × E interaction. Rather, to properly control for confounders, researchers need to enter the covariate × environment and the covariate × gene interaction terms in the same model that tests the G × E term. In this manuscript, I demonstrate this point analytically and show that the practice of improperly controlling for covariates is the norm in the G × E interaction literature to date. Thus, many alternative explanations for G × E findings that investigators had thought were eliminated have not been.

Keywords: Adjustment; confounders; covariates; false positive rate; gene × environment interactions; gene-by-environment interactions; multiple regression; replication.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

Financial Disclosures.

The author reports no biomedical financial interests or potential conflicts of interest.

Cited by

Early maternal care and amygdala habituation to emotional stimuli in adulthood.
Holz NE, Häge A, Plichta MM, Boecker-Schlier R, Jennen-Steinmetz C, Baumeister S, Meyer-Lindenberg A, Laucht M, Banaschewski T, Brandeis D. Holz NE, et al. Soc Cogn Affect Neurosci. 2021 Sep 30;16(10):1100-1110. doi: 10.1093/scan/nsab059. Soc Cogn Affect Neurosci. 2021. PMID: 33963390 Free PMC article.
Catechol-_O_-methyltransferase Val158Met Genotype and Early-Life Family Adversity Interactively Affect Attention-Deficit Hyperactivity Symptoms Across Childhood.
Abraham E, Scott MA, Blair C. Abraham E, et al. Front Genet. 2020 Jul 10;11:724. doi: 10.3389/fgene.2020.00724. eCollection 2020. Front Genet. 2020. PMID: 32765586 Free PMC article.
Cohort of birth modifies the association between FTO genotype and BMI.
Rosenquist JN, Lehrer SF, O'Malley AJ, Zaslavsky AM, Smoller JW, Christakis NA. Rosenquist JN, et al. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2015 Jan 13;112(2):354-9. doi: 10.1073/pnas.1411893111. Epub 2014 Dec 29. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2015. PMID: 25548176 Free PMC article.
Lack of Support for the Genes by Early Environment Interaction Hypothesis in the Pathogenesis of Schizophrenia.
Vassos E, Kou J, Tosato S, Maxwell J, Dennison CA, Legge SE, Walters JTR, Owen MJ, O'Donovan MC, Breen G, Lewis CM, Sullivan PF, Hultman C, Ruggeri M, Walshe M, Bramon E, Bergen SE, Murray RM. Vassos E, et al. Schizophr Bull. 2022 Jan 21;48(1):20-26. doi: 10.1093/schbul/sbab052. Schizophr Bull. 2022. PMID: 33987677 Free PMC article.
Simulated distributions from negative experiments highlight the importance of the body mass index distribution in explaining depression-body mass index genetic risk score interactions.
Casanova F, O'Loughlin J, Lewis C, Frayling TM, Wood AR, Tyrrell J. Casanova F, et al. Int J Epidemiol. 2022 Oct 13;51(5):1581-1592. doi: 10.1093/ije/dyac052. Int J Epidemiol. 2022. PMID: 35388897 Free PMC article.

References

1. Duncan LE, Keller MC. A critical review of the first ten years of candidate gene-by-environment interaction research in psychiatry. American Journal of Psychiatry. 2011;168:1041–1049. - PMC - PubMed
1. Eaves LJ. Genotype x Environment interaction in psychopathology: fact or artifact? Twin Res Hum Genet. 2006;9:1–8. - PubMed
1. Munafo MR, Durrant C, Lewis G, Flint J. Gene X environment interactions at the serotonin transporter locus. Biol Psychiatry. 2009;65:211–219. - PubMed
1. Munafo MR, Flint J. Replication and heterogeneity in gene x environment interaction studies. Int J Neuropsychopharmacol. 2009;12:727–729. - PubMed
1. Risch N, Herrell R, Lehner T, Liang KY, Eaves L, Hoh J, et al. Interaction between the serotonin transporter gene (5-HTTLPR), stressful life events, and risk of depression: a meta-analysis. JAMA. 2009;301:2462–2471. - PMC - PubMed

Publication types

MeSH terms

LinkOut - more resources

Full Text Sources
Other Literature Sources
- scite Smart Citations

Gene × environment interaction studies have not properly controlled for potential confounders: the problem and the (simple) solution - PubMed (original) (raw)