Evaluating the environmental impact of artificial sweeteners: a study of their distributions, photodegradation and toxicities - PubMed (original) (raw)
Evaluating the environmental impact of artificial sweeteners: a study of their distributions, photodegradation and toxicities
Ziye Sang et al. Water Res. 2014.
Abstract
While having a long tradition as safe food additives, artificial sweeteners are a newly recognized class of environmental contaminants due to their extreme persistence and ubiquitous occurrence in various aquatic ecosystems. Resistant to wastewater treatment processes, they are continuously introduced into the water environments. To date however, their environmental behavior, fate as well as long term ecotoxicological contributions in our water resources still remain largely unknown. As a first step in the comprehensive study of artificial sweeteners, this work elucidates the geographical/seasonal/hydrological interactions of acesulfame, cyclamate, saccharin and sucralose in an open coast system at an estuarine/marine junction. Higher occurrence of acesulfame (seasonal average: 0.22 μg L(-1)) and sucralose (0.05 μg L(-1)) was found in summer while saccharin (0.11 μg L(-1)) and cyclamate (0.10 μg L(-1)) were predominantly detected in winter. Seasonal observations of the four sweeteners suggest strong connections with the variable chemical resistance among different sweeteners. Our photodegradation investigation further projected the potential impact of persistent acesulfame and sucralose compounds under prolonged exposure to intensive solar irradiation. Real-time observation by UPLC-ESI/MS of the degradation profile in both sweeteners illustrated that formation of new photo by-products under prolonged UV irradiation is highly viable. Interestingly, two groups of kinetically behaved photodegradates were identified for acesulfame, one of which was at least six times more persistent than the parent compound. For the first time, acute toxicity for the degradates of both sweeteners were arbitrarily measured, revealing photo-enhancement factors of 575 and 17.1 for acesulfame and sucralose, respectively. Direct comparison of photodegradation results suggests that the phototoxicity of acesulfame degradation products may impact aquatic ecosystems. In an attempt to neutralize this prolonged environmental threat, the feasibility of UV/TiO2 as an effective mineralization process in wastewater treatment was evaluated for both sweeteners. Under an environmental and technical relevant condition, a >84% removal rate recorded within 30 min and complete photomineralization was achieved within 2 h and delivering the best cost efficiency comparing to existing removal methods. A compilation of distribution, degradation, toxicity and attenuation results presented in this paper will go through critical discussions to explore some current issues and to pinpoint solutions for a better control in the emergent contamination of artificial sweeteners.
Keywords: Artificial sweetener; Emerging environmental contaminant; Photodegradation; Phototoxicity; UV/TiO(2) photocatalysis; Wastewater treatment.
Copyright © 2013 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.
Similar articles
- Environmental Impact of the Presence, Distribution, and Use of Artificial Sweeteners as Emerging Sources of Pollution.
Naik AQ, Zafar T, Shrivastava VK. Naik AQ, et al. J Environ Public Health. 2021 Apr 14;2021:6624569. doi: 10.1155/2021/6624569. eCollection 2021. J Environ Public Health. 2021. PMID: 33936216 Free PMC article. Review. - Degradation of artificial sweeteners via direct and indirect photochemical reactions.
Perkola N, Vaalgamaa S, Jernberg J, Vähätalo AV. Perkola N, et al. Environ Sci Pollut Res Int. 2016 Jul;23(13):13288-97. doi: 10.1007/s11356-016-6489-4. Epub 2016 Mar 29. Environ Sci Pollut Res Int. 2016. PMID: 27023816 - Photocatalytic transformation of acesulfame: Transformation products identification and embryotoxicity study.
Li AJ, Schmitz OJ, Stephan S, Lenzen C, Yue PY, Li K, Li H, Leung KS. Li AJ, et al. Water Res. 2016 Feb 1;89:68-75. doi: 10.1016/j.watres.2015.11.035. Epub 2015 Nov 22. Water Res. 2016. PMID: 26630044 - Saccharin and other artificial sweeteners in soils: estimated inputs from agriculture and households, degradation, and leaching to groundwater.
Buerge IJ, Keller M, Buser HR, Müller MD, Poiger T. Buerge IJ, et al. Environ Sci Technol. 2011 Jan 15;45(2):615-21. doi: 10.1021/es1031272. Epub 2010 Dec 10. Environ Sci Technol. 2011. PMID: 21142066 - Artificial sweeteners--a recently recognized class of emerging environmental contaminants: a review.
Lange FT, Scheurer M, Brauch HJ. Lange FT, et al. Anal Bioanal Chem. 2012 Jul;403(9):2503-18. doi: 10.1007/s00216-012-5892-z. Epub 2012 Apr 28. Anal Bioanal Chem. 2012. PMID: 22543693 Review.
Cited by
- What Are We Putting in Our Food That Is Making Us Fat? Food Additives, Contaminants, and Other Putative Contributors to Obesity.
Simmons AL, Schlezinger JJ, Corkey BE. Simmons AL, et al. Curr Obes Rep. 2014 Jun 1;3(2):273-85. doi: 10.1007/s13679-014-0094-y. Curr Obes Rep. 2014. PMID: 25045594 Free PMC article. - Measuring Artificial Sweeteners Toxicity Using a Bioluminescent Bacterial Panel.
Harpaz D, Yeo LP, Cecchini F, Koon THP, Kushmaro A, Tok AIY, Marks RS, Eltzov E. Harpaz D, et al. Molecules. 2018 Sep 25;23(10):2454. doi: 10.3390/molecules23102454. Molecules. 2018. PMID: 30257473 Free PMC article. - Environmental Impact of the Presence, Distribution, and Use of Artificial Sweeteners as Emerging Sources of Pollution.
Naik AQ, Zafar T, Shrivastava VK. Naik AQ, et al. J Environ Public Health. 2021 Apr 14;2021:6624569. doi: 10.1155/2021/6624569. eCollection 2021. J Environ Public Health. 2021. PMID: 33936216 Free PMC article. Review. - Dual-high-frequency from single-piezoelectric crystal for ACE degradation by hybrid advanced oxidation UV-sonochemistry process.
Mendez-Arriaga F, Vecitis CD. Mendez-Arriaga F, et al. Ultrason Sonochem. 2021 Oct;78:105731. doi: 10.1016/j.ultsonch.2021.105731. Epub 2021 Aug 19. Ultrason Sonochem. 2021. PMID: 34560395 Free PMC article. - Removal of micropollutants through a biological wastewater treatment plant in a subtropical climate, Queensland-Australia.
Cardenas MA, Ali I, Lai FY, Dawes L, Thier R, Rajapakse J. Cardenas MA, et al. J Environ Health Sci Eng. 2016 Nov 3;14:14. doi: 10.1186/s40201-016-0257-8. eCollection 2016. J Environ Health Sci Eng. 2016. PMID: 27822379 Free PMC article.
Publication types
MeSH terms
Substances
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Other Literature Sources
Research Materials