Calculating and reporting effect sizes to facilitate cumulative science: a practical primer for t-tests and ANOVAs - PubMed (original) (raw)

Review

Calculating and reporting effect sizes to facilitate cumulative science: a practical primer for t-tests and ANOVAs

Daniël Lakens. Front Psychol. 2013.

Abstract

Effect sizes are the most important outcome of empirical studies. Most articles on effect sizes highlight their importance to communicate the practical significance of results. For scientists themselves, effect sizes are most useful because they facilitate cumulative science. Effect sizes can be used to determine the sample size for follow-up studies, or examining effects across studies. This article aims to provide a practical primer on how to calculate and report effect sizes for t-tests and ANOVA's such that effect sizes can be used in a-priori power analyses and meta-analyses. Whereas many articles about effect sizes focus on between-subjects designs and address within-subjects designs only briefly, I provide a detailed overview of the similarities and differences between within- and between-subjects designs. I suggest that some research questions in experimental psychology examine inherently intra-individual effects, which makes effect sizes that incorporate the correlation between measures the best summary of the results. Finally, a supplementary spreadsheet is provided to make it as easy as possible for researchers to incorporate effect size calculations into their workflow.

Keywords: cohen's d; effect sizes; eta-squared; power analysis; sample size planning.

PubMed Disclaimer

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Aberson C. L. (2010). Applied Power Analysis for the Behavioral Sciences. New York, NY: Routledge
    1. Bakeman R. (2005). Recommended effect size statistics for repeated measures designs. Behav. Res. Methods 37, 379–384 10.3758/BF03192707 - DOI - PubMed
    1. Bakker M., van Dijk A., Wicherts J. M. (2012). The rules of the game called psychological science. Perspect. Psychol. Sci. 7, 543–554 10.1177/1745691612459060 - DOI - PubMed
    1. Borenstein M., Hedges L. V., Higgins J. P., Rothstein H. R. (2011). Introduction to Meta-Analysis. Hoboken, NJ: Wiley
    1. Brand A., Bradley M. T., Best L. A., Stoica G. (2008). Accuracy of effect size estimates from published psychological research. Percept. Mot. Skills 106, 645–649 10.2466/pms.106.2.645-649 - DOI - PubMed

Publication types

LinkOut - more resources