Mitochondrial trafficking and anchoring in neurons: New insight and implications - PubMed (original) (raw)

Review

Mitochondrial trafficking and anchoring in neurons: New insight and implications

Zu-Hang Sheng. J Cell Biol. 2014.

Abstract

Mitochondria are essential organelles for neuronal growth, survival, and function. Neurons use specialized mechanisms to drive mitochondria transport and to anchor them in axons and at synapses. Stationary mitochondria buffer intracellular Ca(2+) and serve as a local energy source by supplying ATP. The balance between motile and stationary mitochondria responds quickly to changes in axonal and synaptic physiology. Defects in mitochondrial transport are implicated in the pathogenesis of several major neurological disorders. Recent work has provided new insight in the regulation of microtubule-based mitochondrial trafficking and anchoring, and on how mitochondrial motility influences neuron growth, synaptic function, and mitophagy.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

Figure 1.

Figure 1.

Mitochondrial trafficking and anchoring in neurons. Due to complex structural features, neurons require specialized mechanisms trafficking mitochondria to their distal destinations and anchoring them in regions where metabolic and calcium homeostatic capacity is in a high demand. The figure highlights transporting mitochondria to a presynaptic bouton (A) and an axonal terminal (B). MT-based long-distance mitochondrial transport relies on MT polarity. In axons, the MT’s plus ends (+) are oriented toward axonal terminals whereas minus ends (−) are directed toward the soma. Thus, KIF5 motors are responsible for anterograde transport to distal synaptic terminals whereas dynein motors return mitochondria to the soma. The motor adaptor Trak proteins can mediate both KIF5- and dynein-driven bi-directional transport of axonal mitochondria (van Spronsen et al., 2013). Myosin motors likely drive short-range mitochondrial movement at presynaptic terminals where enriched actin filaments constitute cytoskeletal architecture. Motile mitochondria can be recruited into stationary pools via dynamic anchoring interactions between syntaphilin and MTs (Kang et al., 2008) or via an unidentified actin-based anchoring receptor (Chada and Hollenbeck, 2004). Such anchoring mechanisms ensure neuronal mitochondria are adequately distributed along axons and at synapses, where constant energy supply is crucial (figure courtesy of Qian Cai, Department of Cell Biology and Neuroscience, Rutgers University, Piscataway, NJ).

Figure 2.

Figure 2.

Activity-dependent regulation of mitochondrial transport. (A) The Miro–Milton (or Miro–Trak) adaptor complex mediates KIF5-driven mitochondrial transport. (B) Syntabulin, FEZ1, and RanBP2 serve as an alternative KIF5 motor adaptor in driving mitochondrial anterograde transport. (C and D) Miro-Ca2+ models in regulating mitochondrial motility. Miro contains Ca2+-binding EF-hand motifs. The C-terminal cargo-binding domain of KIF5 motors binds to the Miro–Trak adaptor complex. (C) Ca2+ binding to Miro’s EF-hands induces the motor domain to disconnect with MTs and thus prevents motor–MT engagement (Wang and Schwarz, 2009). (D) Alternatively, Ca2+ binding releases KIF5 motors from mitochondria (MacAskill et al., 2009a). Thus, Ca2+ influx after synaptic activity arrests motile mitochondria at activated synapses. (E) Syntaphilin-mediated “engine-switch and brake” model. A Miro-Ca2+–sensing pathway triggers the binding switch of KIF5 motors from the Miro–Trak adaptor complex to anchoring protein syntaphilin, which immobilizes axonal mitochondria via inhibiting motor ATPase activity. Thus, syntaphilin turns off the “KIF5 motor engine” by sensing a “stop sign” (elevated Ca2+) and putting a brake on mitochondria, thereby anchoring them in place on MTs. When in their stationary status, KIF5 motor–loaded mitochondria remain associated with the MT tracks while KIF5 ATPase is in an inactive state (Chen and Sheng, 2013; Figure courtesy of Qian Cai).

Figure 3.

Figure 3.

Motile mitochondria passing by synapses contribute to presynaptic variation. A stationary mitochondrion within presynaptic terminals powers neurotransmission by stable and continuous ATP supply (left). Conversely, in the absence of a mitochondrion within a presynaptic bouton (right), there is no stable on-site ATP supply; a motile mitochondrion passing through this bouton temporally supplies ATP, thus changing synaptic energy levels and influencing ATP-dependent synaptic functions over time when mitochondrial distribution and motility are altered. Therefore, the fluctuation of synaptic ATP levels resulting from mitochondrial movement is one of the primary sources for the wide variability of synaptic vesicle release and amplitudes of excitatory postsynaptic currents (EPSCs; Sun et al., 2013).

Figure 4.

Figure 4.

Functional interplay between mitochondrial transport and mitophagy. Chronically dissipating mitochondrial membrane potential (Δψm) by prolonged treatment of low concentrations of Δψm-uncoupling reagents accumulates Parkin-targeted mitochondria in the soma and proximal regions. Such compartmental restriction is a result of altered motility of depolarized mitochondria with reduced anterograde and relatively enhanced retrograde transport, thus reducing anterograde flux of damaged mitochondria into distal processes (Cai et al., 2012). This spatial process allows neurons to efficiently remove dysfunctional mitochondria from distal axons via the autophagy–lysosomal pathway in the soma, where mature lysosomes are relatively enriched. Damaged mitochondria at axonal terminals can also recruit Parkin for mitophagy once they are anchored by syntaphilin (Cai et al., 2012) or immobilized by turnover of the motor adaptor Miro on the mitochondrial surface (Weihofen et al., 2009; Chan et al., 2011; Wang et al., 2011; Yoshii et al., 2011; Liu et al., 2012; Sarraf et al., 2013). Autophagosomes including those engulfing damaged mitochondria at axonal terminals transport predominantly to the soma for maturation and more efficient degradation of cargoes within acidic lysosomes (Maday et al., 2012).

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Attwell D., Laughlin S.B. 2001. An energy budget for signaling in the grey matter of the brain. J. Cereb. Blood Flow Metab. 21:1133–1145 10.1097/00004647-200110000-00001 - DOI - PubMed
    1. Atwood H.L., Karunanithi S. 2002. Diversification of synaptic strength: presynaptic elements. Nat. Rev. Neurosci. 3:497–516 10.1038/nrn876 - DOI - PubMed
    1. Baloh R.H., Schmidt R.E., Pestronk A., Milbrandt J. 2007. Altered axonal mitochondrial transport in the pathogenesis of Charcot-Marie-Tooth disease from mitofusin 2 mutations. J. Neurosci. 27:422–430 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.4798-06.2007 - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Billups B., Forsythe I.D. 2002. Presynaptic mitochondrial calcium sequestration influences transmission at mammalian central synapses. J. Neurosci. 22:5840–5847 - PMC - PubMed
    1. Bilsland L.G., Sahai E., Kelly G., Golding M., Greensmith L., Schiavo G. 2010. Deficits in axonal transport precede ALS symptoms in vivo. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA. 107:20523–20528 10.1073/pnas.1006869107 - DOI - PMC - PubMed

Publication types

MeSH terms

LinkOut - more resources