Neuronal pentraxin 2 supports clear cell renal cell carcinoma by activating the AMPA-selective glutamate receptor-4 - PubMed (original) (raw)
Neuronal pentraxin 2 supports clear cell renal cell carcinoma by activating the AMPA-selective glutamate receptor-4
Christina A von Roemeling et al. Cancer Res. 2014.
Abstract
Clear cell renal cell carcinoma (ccRCC) is the most common subtype of kidney cancer and has the highest propensity to manifest as metastatic disease. Recent characterizations of the genetic signature of ccRCC have revealed several factors correlated with tumor cell migration and invasion; however, the specific events driving malignancy are not well defined. Furthermore, there remains a lack of targeted therapies that result in long-term, sustainable response in patients with metastatic disease. We show here that neuronal pentraxin 2 (NPTX2) is overexpressed specifically in ccRCC primary tumors and metastases, and that it contributes to tumor cell viability and promotes cell migration through its interaction with the α-amino-3-hydroxy-5-methyl-4-isoxazolepropionic acid receptor subunit GluR4. We propose NPTX2 as a novel molecular target for therapy for patients with ccRCC diagnosed with or at risk of developing metastatic disease.
©2014 American Association for Cancer Research.
Conflict of interest statement
Conflicts of interest:
The authors of this manuscript have no conflicts of interest to disclose.
Figures
Figure 1. NPTX2 expression profile in clear cell Renal Cell Carcinoma
(A) TMA IHC of patient ccRCC vs. matched normal tissue for NPTX2 expression in stage I, II, III, IV (primary), and IV (metastatic) (normal n=44, 32, 35, 7, and 6 and tumor n= 41, 26, 33, 10, and 17 respectively). Cytoplasmic and membranous staining pattern observed. H-score ± standard deviation from the mean is shown. (B) Western blot of protein lysates prepared from NRE cells and ccRCC cell lines for NPTX2 expression. Protein expression level quantitation is normalized to β-actin, and total human brain tissue lysate was used as a positive control. (C) NPTX2 knockdown was evaluated in A498, KIJ265T, and Caki2 ccRCC cell lines infected with the sh1316 lentiviral construct as compared to NT controls via QPCR. (D) 7 day proliferation assay of ccRCC sh1316 clones vs. NT controls. (E) Cell death of A498, KIJ265T, and Caki2 NT vs. sh1316 cell populations analyzed via flow cytometry. (F) Western blot for total and cleaved PARP in NT vs. NPTX2 knockdown cells. Cells collected for cell death analysis (panels E and F) correspond to day 7 of proliferation assay (panel D).
Figure 2. NPTX2 modulates actin cytoskeletal remodeling and promotes invasion
(A) Phase-contrast microscopy of empty vector vs. NPTX2 transfected (+NPTX2) RWV366T and Caki1 cells, taken at 20x magnification. Arrows are used to highlight select membranous protrusions. IF of (B) empty vector vs. NPTX2 (HA tagged) transfected (+NPTX2) RWV366T cells and (C) A498 cells stained for NPTX2 (left panel) and VASP (center panel). Images are merged in the right panel. 60x magnification of regions highlighted in 20x images are shown. (D) Pathway signature of EMT/cell migration in high-NPTX2 expressing tumors identified using Ingenuity Software analysis. Genes highlighted in orange are significantly upregulated in high-NPTX2 expressing tumors (P<0.05). QPCR for EMT-associated genes in NT vs. sh1316 NPTX2 knockdown (E) A498, (F) KIJ265T, and (G) Caki2 cells. Invasion assay of (H) empty vector vs. NPTX2 over-expressing Caki1 and RWV366T cells and (I) KIJ265T and A498 NT vs. sh1316 NPTX2 knockdown cells. Experiments were performed in triplicate, and representative images are displayed. Results are quantitated as invading cells per visual field.
Figure 3. GluR4 is overexpressed in ccRCC
(A) TMA IHC of patient ccRCC vs. matched normal tissue for NPTXR expression in stage I, II, III, IV (primary), and IV (metastatic) (normal n=12, 35, 34, 8, and 7 and tumor n= 13, 29, 34, 8, and 19 respectively). Human cerebellum tissue used as a positive control for NPTXR expression. (B) TMA IHC of patient ccRCC vs. matched normal tissue for GluR4 expression in stage I, II, III, IV (primary), and IV (metastatic) (normal n=45, 35, 38, 8, and 6 and tumor n= 39, 29, 34, 8, and 21 respectively). Cytoplasmic and membranous staining pattern observed. Human cerebellum tissue used as a positive control for GluR4 expression. H-score ± standard deviation from the mean is shown for NPTXR and GluR4 IHC analysis. (C) QPCR of NRE versus ccRCC cell lines for GluR1-4 (n=4 for both NRE and tumor samples). Tumor transcript expression is normalized to average NRE transcript expression. (D) Western blot of protein lysates prepared from NRE cells and ccRCC cell lines for GluR4 expression. Protein expression level quantitation is normalized to β-actin, and total human brain tissue lysate was used as a positive control.
Figure 4. GluR4 binds NPTX2 and promotes ccRCC cell viability
(A) Confocal immunofluorescence of non-permeabilized Caki2 NT, sh1316, and sh1676 clones for NPTX2 binding to the cell membrane. Each cell is outlined, and cross sections are displayed in the upper and right panels for each image. Relative fluorescence corresponding to NPTX2 expression is quantitated. IP of KIJ265T and Caki2 cells transfected with both HA epitope tagged human NPTX2 and Flag epitope tagged human GluR4 (HA-Flag) versus empty vector (EV) for (B) HA (NPTX2) mediated Flag (GluR4) pulldown and (C) Flag (GluR4) mediated HA (NPTX2) pulldown. WB of total lysate (Total) confirms expression of epitope tagged proteins. (D) QPCR for GluR4 expression in A498, KIJ265T, and Caki2 NT vs. sh1676 GluR4 knockdown cell populations. (E) 7 day proliferation assay of A498, KIJ265T, and Caki2 NT vs. sh1676 clones. (F) Cell death of A498, KIJ265T, and Caki2 NT vs. sh1676 cell populations analyzed via flow cytometry. (G) Western blot for total and cleaved PARP in A498, KIJ265T, and Caki2 NT vs. GluR4 knockdown cells. Cells collected for cell death analysis (panels F and G) correspond to day 7 of proliferation assay (panel E).
Figure 5. NPTX2-GluR4 mediates influx of intracellular calcium in ccRCC cells
(A) Proliferation of ccRCC cells in response to CFM-2 treatment (AMPA receptor antagonist) at day 7. (B) Effects of CFM-2 on A498 intracellular calcium levels using the cell permeable fluorescently labeled calcium indicator Calcium Green™-1, AM. Results are calculated as change in fluorescence over time (min). (*) Denotes significant change in fluorescence as compared to DMSO control per time point. (C) Western blot of KIJ265T and A498 cells treated with DMSO vs. CFM-2 (10µM, 1 hour) for phosphorylation of CAMK1(T177) and AKT(S473). (D) Western blot of R-NPTX2 (1ng/µL) treated Caki1 cells for phosphorylation of CAMK1(T177) and AKT(S473) treated with DMSO vs. CFM-2 (10µM) over time (min). (E) Invasion assay of DMSO vs. CFM-2 (10µM) treated KIJ265T and A498 cells. Experiments were performed in triplicate, and representative images are displayed. Results are quantitated as invading cells per visual field.
Similar articles
- MicroRNA-96 is a potential tumor repressor by inhibiting NPTX2 in renal cell carcinoma.
Xiang W, Han L, Mo G, Lin L, Yu X, Chen S, Gao T, Huang C. Xiang W, et al. J Cell Biochem. 2020 Feb;121(2):1504-1513. doi: 10.1002/jcb.29385. Epub 2019 Sep 9. J Cell Biochem. 2020. PMID: 31498486 - High-level S100A6 promotes metastasis and predicts the outcome of T1-T2 stage in clear cell renal cell carcinoma.
Lyu X, Li H, Ma X, Li X, Gao Y, Ni D, Shen D, Gu L, Wang B, Zhang Y, Zhang X. Lyu X, et al. Cell Biochem Biophys. 2015 Jan;71(1):279-90. doi: 10.1007/s12013-014-0196-x. Cell Biochem Biophys. 2015. PMID: 25120023 - Dicer is down-regulated in clear cell renal cell carcinoma and in vitro Dicer knockdown enhances malignant phenotype transformation.
Ma X, Fan Y, Gao Y, Zhang Y, Huang Q, Ai Q, Ni D, Chen W, Zhang P, Song E, Wang B, Shi T, Zheng T, Zhang X. Ma X, et al. Urol Oncol. 2014 Jan;32(1):46.e9-17. doi: 10.1016/j.urolonc.2013.06.011. Epub 2013 Oct 4. Urol Oncol. 2014. PMID: 24094887 - Long non-coding RNA ZFAS1 promotes proliferation and metastasis of clear cell renal cell carcinoma via targeting miR-10a/SKA1 pathway.
Dong D, Mu Z, Wei N, Sun M, Wang W, Xin N, Shao Y, Zhao C. Dong D, et al. Biomed Pharmacother. 2019 Mar;111:917-925. doi: 10.1016/j.biopha.2018.12.143. Epub 2019 Jan 7. Biomed Pharmacother. 2019. PMID: 30841471 - Engrailed-2 might play an anti-oncogenic role in clear-cell renal cell carcinoma.
Lai CY, Xu Y, Yu GS, Wu X, Li YF, Pan B, Heng BL, Xue YJ, Su ZX. Lai CY, et al. J Mol Histol. 2016 Jun;47(3):229-37. doi: 10.1007/s10735-016-9665-4. Epub 2016 Mar 7. J Mol Histol. 2016. PMID: 26948025 Review.
Cited by
- Screening of differential gene expression patterns through survival analysis for diagnosis, prognosis and therapies of clear cell renal cell carcinoma.
Ajadee A, Mahmud S, Hossain MB, Ahmmed R, Ali MA, Reza MS, Sarker SK, Mollah MNH. Ajadee A, et al. PLoS One. 2024 Sep 30;19(9):e0310843. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0310843. eCollection 2024. PLoS One. 2024. PMID: 39348357 Free PMC article. - Prognostic Significance of VAV3 Gene Variants and Expression in Renal Cell Carcinoma.
Chang CF, Bao BY, Hsueh YM, Chen PL, Chang LH, Li CY, Geng JH, Lu TL, Huang CY, Huang SP. Chang CF, et al. Biomedicines. 2024 Jul 30;12(8):1694. doi: 10.3390/biomedicines12081694. Biomedicines. 2024. PMID: 39200159 Free PMC article. - Development of prognostic signatures and risk index related to lipid metabolism in ccRCC.
Chen W, Zhao Z, Zhou H, Dong S, Li X, Hu S, Zhong S, Chen K. Chen W, et al. Front Oncol. 2024 Jun 13;14:1378095. doi: 10.3389/fonc.2024.1378095. eCollection 2024. Front Oncol. 2024. PMID: 38939337 Free PMC article. - A secreted proteomic footprint for stem cell pluripotency.
Lewis PA, Silajdžić E, Smith H, Bates N, Smith CA, Mancini FE, Knight D, Denning C, Brison DR, Kimber SJ. Lewis PA, et al. PLoS One. 2024 Jun 14;19(6):e0299365. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0299365. eCollection 2024. PLoS One. 2024. PMID: 38875182 Free PMC article. - TRIM26 inhibits clear cell renal cell carcinoma progression through destabilizing ETK and thus inactivation of AKT/mTOR signaling.
Zheng D, Ning J, Deng H, Ruan Y, Cheng F. Zheng D, et al. J Transl Med. 2024 May 21;22(1):481. doi: 10.1186/s12967-024-05273-w. J Transl Med. 2024. PMID: 38773612 Free PMC article.
References
- Siegel R, Naishadham D, Jemal A. Cancer statistics, 2013. CA Cancer J Clin. 2013;63:11–30. - PubMed
- Patard JJ, Leray E, Rioux-Leclercq N, Cindolo L, Ficarra V, Zisman A, et al. Prognostic value of histologic subtypes in renal cell carcinoma: a multicenter experience. J Clin Oncol. 2005;23:2763–2771. - PubMed
- Lam JS, Shvarts O, Pantuck AJ. Changing concepts in the surgical management of renal cell carcinoma. Eur Urol. 2004;45:692–705. - PubMed
- Li G, Passebosc-Faure K, Lambert C, Gentil-Perret A, Blanc F, Oosterwijk E, et al. The expression of G250/mn/CA9 antigen by flow cytometry: its possible implication for detection of micrometastatic renal cancer cells. Clin Cancer Res. 2001;7:89–92. - PubMed
- Cohen HT, McGovern FJ. Renal-cell carcinoma. N Engl J Med. 2005;353:2477–2490. - PubMed
Publication types
MeSH terms
Substances
Grants and funding
- R01 CA136665/CA/NCI NIH HHS/United States
- R01 CA104505/CA/NCI NIH HHS/United States
- P30 CA015083/CA/NCI NIH HHS/United States
- R01CA104505-05S1/CA/NCI NIH HHS/United States
- R01CA136665/CA/NCI NIH HHS/United States
- R01CA104505/CA/NCI NIH HHS/United States
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Other Literature Sources
Medical