PCA3 in prostate cancer and tumor aggressiveness detection on 407 high-risk patients: a National Cancer Institute experience - PubMed (original) (raw)
doi: 10.1186/s13046-015-0127-8.
Luigi Tomao 2 3, Anna Antenucci 4, Isabella Sperduti 5, Steno Sentinelli 6, Serena Masi 7, Chiara Mandoj 8, Giulia Orlandi 9, Rocco Papalia 10, Salvatore Guaglianone 11, Manuela Costantini 12, Giuseppe Cusumano 13, Giovanni Cigliana 14, Paolo Ascenzi 15 16, Michele Gallucci 17, Laura Conti 18
Affiliations
- PMID: 25651917
- PMCID: PMC4324853
- DOI: 10.1186/s13046-015-0127-8
PCA3 in prostate cancer and tumor aggressiveness detection on 407 high-risk patients: a National Cancer Institute experience
Roberta Merola et al. J Exp Clin Cancer Res. 2015.
Abstract
Background: Prostate cancer (PCa) is the most common male cancer in Europe and the US. The early diagnosis relies on prostate specific antigen (PSA) serum test, even if it showed clear limits. Among the new tests currently under study, one of the most promising is the prostate cancer gene 3 (PCA3), a non-coding mRNA whose level increases up to 100 times in PCa tissues when compared to normal tissues. With the present study we contribute to the validation of the clinical utility of the PCA3 test and to the evaluation of its prognostic potential.
Methods: 407 Italian men, with two or more PCa risk factors and at least a previous negative biopsy, entering the Urology Unit of Regina Elena National Cancer Institute, were tested for PCA3, total PSA (tPSA) and free PSA (fPSA and f/tPSA) tests. Out of the 407 men enrolled, 195 were positive for PCa and 114 of them received an accurate staging with evaluation of the Gleason score (Gs). Then, the PCA3 score was correlated to biopsy outcome, and the diagnostic and prognostic utility were evaluated.
Results: Out of the 407 biopsies performed after the PCA3 test, 195 (48%) resulted positive for PCa; the PCA3 score was significantly higher in this population (p < 0.0001) differently to tPSA (p = 0.87). Moreover, the PCA3 test outperformed the f/tPSA (p = 0.01). The sensitivity (94.9) and specificity (60.1) of the PCA3 test showed a better balance for a threshold of 35 when compared to 20, even if the best result was achieved considering a cutoff of 51, with sensitivity and specificity of 82.1% and 79.3%, respectively. Finally, comparing values of the PCA3 test between two subgroups with increasing Gs (Gs ≤ 6 versus Gs ≥ 7) a significant association between PCA3 score and Gs was found (p = 0.02).
Conclusions: The PCA3 test showed the best diagnostic performance when compared to tPSA and f/tPSA, facilitating the selection of high-risk patients that may benefit from the execution of a saturation prostatic biopsy. Moreover, the PCA3 test showed a prognostic value, as higher PCA3 score values are associated to a greater tumor aggressiveness.
Figures
Figure 1
tPSA (A), f/tPSA (B) and PCA3 score (C) values for patients negative and positive for PCa.
Figure 2
Relationship between PCA3 score and the percentage of positive biopsies.
Figure 3
ROC analysis with evaluation of the corresponding AUC for tPSA (0.505), f/tPSA (0.607) and PCA3 score (0.865).
Similar articles
- A comparative performance analysis of total prostate-specific antigen, percentage free prostate-specific antigen, prostate-specific antigen velocity and urinary prostate cancer gene 3 in the first, second and third repeat prostate biopsy.
Auprich M, Augustin H, Budäus L, Kluth L, Mannweiler S, Shariat SF, Fisch M, Graefen M, Pummer K, Chun FK. Auprich M, et al. BJU Int. 2012 Jun;109(11):1627-35. doi: 10.1111/j.1464-410X.2011.10584.x. Epub 2011 Sep 21. BJU Int. 2012. PMID: 21939492 Clinical Trial. - Prostate health index (phi) and prostate cancer antigen 3 (PCA3) significantly improve diagnostic accuracy in patients undergoing prostate biopsy.
Perdonà S, Bruzzese D, Ferro M, Autorino R, Marino A, Mazzarella C, Perruolo G, Longo M, Spinelli R, Di Lorenzo G, Oliva A, De Sio M, Damiano R, Altieri V, Terracciano D. Perdonà S, et al. Prostate. 2013 Feb 15;73(3):227-35. doi: 10.1002/pros.22561. Epub 2012 Jul 20. Prostate. 2013. PMID: 22821756 - Urine TMPRSS2:ERG Plus PCA3 for Individualized Prostate Cancer Risk Assessment.
Tomlins SA, Day JR, Lonigro RJ, Hovelson DH, Siddiqui J, Kunju LP, Dunn RL, Meyer S, Hodge P, Groskopf J, Wei JT, Chinnaiyan AM. Tomlins SA, et al. Eur Urol. 2016 Jul;70(1):45-53. doi: 10.1016/j.eururo.2015.04.039. Epub 2015 May 16. Eur Urol. 2016. PMID: 25985884 Free PMC article. - Urinary Prostate Cancer Antigen 3 as a Tumour Marker: Biochemical and Clinical Aspects.
Schmid M, Hansen J, Chun FK. Schmid M, et al. Adv Exp Med Biol. 2015;867:277-89. doi: 10.1007/978-94-017-7215-0_17. Adv Exp Med Biol. 2015. PMID: 26530372 Review. - Prostate health index vs percent free prostate-specific antigen for prostate cancer detection in men with "gray" prostate-specific antigen levels at first biopsy: systematic review and meta-analysis.
Bruzzese D, Mazzarella C, Ferro M, Perdonà S, Chiodini P, Perruolo G, Terracciano D. Bruzzese D, et al. Transl Res. 2014 Dec;164(6):444-51. doi: 10.1016/j.trsl.2014.06.006. Epub 2014 Jun 26. Transl Res. 2014. PMID: 25035153 Review.
Cited by
- Contemporary Update on Clinical and Experimental Prostate Cancer Biomarkers: A Multi-Omics-Focused Approach to Detection and Risk Stratification.
Hachem S, Yehya A, El Masri J, Mavingire N, Johnson JR, Dwead AM, Kattour N, Bouchi Y, Kobeissy F, Rais-Bahrami S, Mechref Y, Abou-Kheir W, Woods-Burnham L. Hachem S, et al. Biology (Basel). 2024 Sep 25;13(10):762. doi: 10.3390/biology13100762. Biology (Basel). 2024. PMID: 39452071 Free PMC article. Review. - Development of a highly sensitive digital PCR assay to quantify long non-coding RNA MYU in urine samples which exhibited great potential as an alternative diagnostic biomarker for prostate cancer.
Liu D, Yin H, Wang Y, Cao Y, Yin J, Zhang J, Yin H, Zhao X. Liu D, et al. Transl Androl Urol. 2021 Oct;10(10):3815-3825. doi: 10.21037/tau-21-820. Transl Androl Urol. 2021. PMID: 34804824 Free PMC article. - A novel long non-coding RNA linc-ZNF469-3 promotes lung metastasis through miR-574-5p-ZEB1 axis in triple negative breast cancer.
Wang PS, Chou CH, Lin CH, Yao YC, Cheng HC, Li HY, Chuang YC, Yang CN, Ger LP, Chen YC, Lin FC, Shen TL, Hsiao M, Lu PJ. Wang PS, et al. Oncogene. 2018 Aug;37(34):4662-4678. doi: 10.1038/s41388-018-0293-1. Epub 2018 May 14. Oncogene. 2018. PMID: 29755127 - PCA3 and TMPRSS2-ERG gene fusions as diagnostic biomarkers for prostate cancer.
Yang Z, Yu L, Wang Z. Yang Z, et al. Chin J Cancer Res. 2016 Feb;28(1):65-71. doi: 10.3978/j.issn.1000-9604.2016.01.05. Chin J Cancer Res. 2016. PMID: 27041928 Free PMC article. Review. - Prostate Cancer Detection and Prognosis: From Prostate Specific Antigen (PSA) to Exosomal Biomarkers.
Filella X, Foj L. Filella X, et al. Int J Mol Sci. 2016 Oct 26;17(11):1784. doi: 10.3390/ijms17111784. Int J Mol Sci. 2016. PMID: 27792187 Free PMC article. Review.
References
- Sofra M, Antenucci A, Gallucci M, Mandoj C, Papalia R, Claroni C, et al. Perioperative changes in pro and anticoagulant factors in prostate cancer patients undergoing laparoscopic and robotic radical prostatectomy with different anaesthetic techniques. J Exp Clin Cancer Res. 2014;33(1):63. doi: 10.1186/s13046-014-0063-z. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
- Croswell JM, Kramer BS, Crawford ED. Screening for prostate cancer with PSA testing: current status and future directions. Oncology (Williston Park) 2011;25(6):452–60. - PubMed
MeSH terms
Substances
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Other Literature Sources
Medical
Research Materials
Miscellaneous