Determining Strength: A Case for Multiple Methods of Measurement - PubMed (original) (raw)

Determining Strength: A Case for Multiple Methods of Measurement

Samuel L Buckner et al. Sports Med. 2017 Feb.

Abstract

Muscle strength is often measured through the performance of a one-repetition maximum (1RM). However, we that feel a true measurement of 'strength' remains elusive. For example, low-load alternatives to traditional resistance training result in muscle hypertrophic changes similar to those resulting from traditional high-load resistance training, with less robust changes observed with maximal strength measured by the 1RM. However, when strength is measured using a test to which both groups are 'naive', differences in strength become less apparent. We suggest that the 1RM is a specific skill, which will improve most when training incorporates its practice or when a lift is completed at a near-maximal load. Thus, if we only recognize increases in the 1RM as indicative of strength, we will overlook many effective and diverse alternatives to traditional high-load resistance training. We wish to suggest that multiple measurements of strength assessment be utilized in order to capture a more complete picture of the adaptation to resistance training.

PubMed Disclaimer

Comment in

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Scand J Med Sci Sports. 2014 Dec;24(6):e415-422 - PubMed
    1. Eur J Appl Physiol Occup Physiol. 1996;74(1-2):52-9 - PubMed
    1. J Appl Physiol (1985). 2012 Jul;113(1):71-7 - PubMed
    1. Med Sci Sports Exerc. 2011 Jul;43(7):1334-59 - PubMed
    1. Eur J Appl Physiol. 2002 Nov;88(1-2):50-60 - PubMed

MeSH terms

LinkOut - more resources