Attitudes to in vitro meat: A survey of potential consumers in the United States - PubMed (original) (raw)

Attitudes to in vitro meat: A survey of potential consumers in the United States

Matti Wilks et al. PLoS One. 2017.

Abstract

Positivity towards meat consumption remains strong, despite evidence of negative environmental and ethical outcomes. Although awareness of these repercussions is rising, there is still public resistance to removing meat from our diets. One potential method to alleviate these effects is to produce in vitro meat: meat grown in a laboratory that does not carry the same environmental or ethical concerns. However, there is limited research examining public attitudes towards in vitro meat, thus we know little about the capacity for it be accepted by consumers. This study aimed to examine perceptions of in vitro meat and identify potential barriers that might prevent engagement. Through conducting an online survey with US participants, we identified that although most respondents were willing to try in vitro meat, only one third were definitely or probably willing to eat in vitro meat regularly or as a replacement for farmed meat. Men were more receptive to it than women, as were politically liberal respondents compared with conservative ones. Vegetarians and vegans were more likely to perceive benefits compared to farmed meat, but they were less likely to want to try it than meat eaters. The main concerns were an anticipated high price, limited taste and appeal and a concern that the product was unnatural. It is concluded that people in the USA are likely to try in vitro meat, but few believed that it would replace farmed meat in their diet.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

Competing Interests: The authors have declared that no competing interests exist.

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. USDA. Chickens, cows and pigs…oh my!. Rabobank, 2016.
    1. Walker P, Rhubart-Berg P, McKenzie S, Kelling K, Lawrence RS. Public health implications of meat production and consumption. Public Health Nutr. 2005;8(4):348–56. - PubMed
    1. Rollin BE. Animal Welfare and Rights: VI. Animals in Agriculture and Factory Farming. 2004. p. 212–5.
    1. Nature. How to feed a hungry world: producing enough food for the world's population in 2050 will be easy. But doing it at an acceptable cost to the planet will depend on research into everything from high-tech seeds to low-tech farming practices.(EDITORIALS)(Editorial). Nature. 2010;466(7306):531. - PubMed
    1. Daniel CR, Cross AJ, Koebnick C, Sinha R. Trends in meat consumption in the United States. Public Health Nutrition 2011;14(4):575–83. 10.1017/S1368980010002077 - DOI - PMC - PubMed

MeSH terms

Grants and funding

The authors received no specific funding for this work.

LinkOut - more resources