Verification and Validation of Digital Pathology (Whole Slide Imaging) for Primary Histopathological Diagnosis: All Wales Experience - PubMed (original) (raw)

doi: 10.4103/jpi.jpi_55_20. eCollection 2021.

A Gunavardhan 1, J Walker 2, T Corfield 1, P Huey 1, A Savage 1, A Bansal 1, M Atkinson 1, H Abdelsalam 1, E Raweily 1, A Christian 3, I Evangelou 3, D Thomas 3, J Shannon 4, E Youd 4, P Brumwell 4, J Harrison 5, I Thompson 5, M Rashid 5, G Leopold 6, A Finall 6 7, S Roberts 8, D Housa 9, P Nedeva 9, A Davies 1, D Fletcher 1, Muhammad Aslam 1

Affiliations

Verification and Validation of Digital Pathology (Whole Slide Imaging) for Primary Histopathological Diagnosis: All Wales Experience

M Babawale et al. J Pathol Inform. 2021.

Abstract

Aims: The study is aimed to verify Aperio AT2 scanner for reporting on the digital pathology platform (DP) and to validate the cohort of pathologists in the interpretation of DP for routine diagnostic histopathological services in Wales, United Kingdom.

Materials methods and results: This was a large multicenter study involving seven hospitals across Wales and unique with 22 (largest number) pathologists participating. 7491 slides from 3001 cases were scanned on Leica Aperio AT2 scanner and reported on digital workstations with Leica software of e-slide manager. A senior pathology fellow compared DP reports with authorized reports on glass slide (GS). A panel of expert pathologists reviewed the discrepant cases under multiheader microscope to establish ground truth. 2745 out of 3001 (91%) cases showed complete concordance between DP and GS reports. Two hundred and fifty-six cases showed discrepancies in diagnosis, of which 170 (5.6%) were deemed of no clinical significance by the review panel. There were 86 (2.9%) clinically significant discrepancies in the diagnosis between DP and GS. The concordance was raised to 97.1% after discounting clinically insignificant discrepancies. Ground truth lay with DP in 28 out of 86 clinically significant discrepancies and with GS in 58 cases. Sensitivity of DP was 98.07% (confidence interval [CI] 97.57-98.56%); for GS was 99.07% (CI 98.72-99.41%).

Conclusions: We concluded that Leica Aperio AT2 scanner produces adequate quality of images for routine histopathologic diagnosis. Pathologists were able to diagnose in DP with good concordance as with GS.

Strengths and limitations of this study: Strengths of this study - This was a prospective blind study. Different pathologists reported digital and glass arms at different times giving an ambience of real-time reporting. There was standardized use of software and hardware across Wales. A strong managerial support from efficiency through the technology group was a key factor for the implementation of the study.

Limitations: This study did not include Cytopathology and in situ hybridization slides. Difficulty in achieving surgical pathology practise standardization across the whole country contributed to intra-observer variations.

Keywords: Concordance; diagnosis; digital pathology; glass slides; ground truth; light microscopy; scanned slides/whole slide imaging; validation; variances/discrepancies; verification.

Copyright: © 2021 Journal of Pathology Informatics.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

There are no conflicts of interest.

Figures

Chart 1

Chart 1

Process flow mapping

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Snead DR, Tsang YW, Meskiri A, Kimani PK, Crossman R, Rajpoot NM, et al. Validation of digital pathology imaging for primary histopathological diagnosis. Histopathology. 2016;68:1063–72. - PubMed
    1. Goacher E, Randell R, Williams B, Treanor D. The diagnostic concordance of whole slide imaging and light microscopy: A systematic review. Arch Pathol Lab Med. 2017;141:151–61. - PubMed
    1. Fallon MA, Wilbur DC, Prasad M. Ovarian frozen section diagnosis: Use of whole-slide imaging shows excellent correlation between virtual slide and original interpretations in a large series of cases. Arch Pathol Lab Med. 2011;135:372–8. - PubMed
    1. Thorstenson S, Molin J, Lundström C. Implementation of large-scale routine diagnostics using whole slide imaging in Sweden: Digital pathology experiences 2006-2013. J Pathol Inform. 2014;5:14. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Hanna MG, Pantanowitz L, Evans AJ. Overview of contemporary guidelines in digital pathology: What is available in 2015 and what still needs to be addressed? J Clin Pathol. 2015;68:499–505. - PubMed

LinkOut - more resources