Vegetarians and different types of meat eaters among the Finnish adult population from 2007 to 2017 - PubMed (original) (raw)

Vegetarians and different types of meat eaters among the Finnish adult population from 2007 to 2017

Elviira Lehto et al. Br J Nutr. 2022.

Abstract

From health and sustainability perspectives, reduction in the consumption of animal-based foods, especially red meat, is a key strategy. The present study examined the prevalence, sociodemographic and lifestyle factors, food consumption and food choice motives of vegetarians and consumers of low and high amounts of red and processed meat (RPM) among Finnish adults. We applied the data from three national health studies: FINRISK 2007 (n 4874), FINRISK 2012 (n 4812) and FinHealth 2017 (n 4442). Participants addressed their food consumption with a FFQ and answered other questionnaires about sociodemographic and lifestyle factors, as well as food choice motives. The prevalence of vegetarianism increased from 0·7 % in 2012 to 1·8 % in 2017, and median daily RPM consumption decreased from 128 g in 2007 to 119 g in 2012 and to 96 g in 2017. Vegetarians and members of the low-RPM group were more often women, younger and more highly educated than the high-RPM group, both in 2007 and 2017. Still, the importance of sex for the probability of a vegetarian diet decreased, while its importance for high-RPM consumption increased. Vegetarians consumed more fruit, vegetables, legumes, nuts and seeds than either the low- or high-RPM groups. The high-RPM group had the lowest scores in several aspects of healthy and sustainable diet, healthy food choice motives and healthy lifestyle. Vegetarians and groups differing in their RPM consumption levels might benefit from differing interventions and nutrition information taking into account their other dietary habits, food choice motives and lifestyle factors.

Keywords: Food choice motives; Food consumption; Health behaviour; Lifestyle factors; Red and processed meat; Vegetarian.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

Fig. 1.

Fig. 1.

Flow diagram of the participation in FINRISK 2007, FINRISK 2012 and FinHealth 2017 Studies and the aims of the present research. RPM, red and processed meat.

References

    1. Sage C. (2016) Making and un-making meat: cultural boundaries, environmental thresholds and dietary transgressions. In Food Transgressions, pp. 181–204 [Goodman M & Sage C, editors]. London: Routledge.
    1. Allievi F, Vinnari M & Luukkanen J (2015) Meat consumption and production–analysis of efficiency, sufficiency and consistency of global trends. J Clean Prod 92, 142–151.
    1. Natural Resources Institute Finland (Luke) (2019) Meat and dairy consumption in Finland. Balance sheet for food commodities 2018, preliminary and 2017 final figures. https://stat.luke.fi/en/balance-sheet-food-commodities-2018-preliminary-... (accessed November 2020).
    1. European Environment Agency (2016) Trends in consumption of selected animal-based food products 2000–2013. https://www.eea.europa.eu/data-and-maps/indicators/13.2-development-in-c... (accessed November 2020).
    1. National Nutrition Council (2014) Terveyttä Ruoasta – Suomalaiset Ravitsemussuositukset 2014 [Finnish Nutrition Recommendations]. Helsinki, Finland: National Nutrition Council.

Publication types

MeSH terms

LinkOut - more resources