NASA ACRV (original) (raw)
Home - Search - Browse - Alphabetic Index: 0- 1- 2- 3- 4- 5- 6- 7- 8- 9
A- B- C- D- E- F- G- H- I- J- K- L- M- N- O- P- Q- R- S- T- U- V- W- X- Y- Z
NASA ACRV
NASA ACRV
NASA Assured Crew Return Vehicle
Credit: NASA via Marcus Lindroos
American manned spaceplane. Assured Crew Return Vehicle or Astronaut Crew Rescue Vehicle. Study 1986. The early Space Station proposals assumed the facility would be equipped with a 'safe haven' where the crew would wait for a rescue Shuttle in case of emergency.
Status: Study 1986. Gross mass: 9,072 kg (20,000 lb). Height: 8.70 m (28.50 ft).
After the 1986 Space Shuttle Challenger accident, it became obvious that some sort of 'lifeboat' would have to be added....
NASA's Johnson Space Center began examining the alternatives, including refurbishing old unused Apollo lunar capsules from the 1960s! The cheapest options examined included:
- The $600-million 'Station Crew Return Alternative Module' (SCRAM) would have consisted of a heat shield from the Viking Mars probe and a cylindrical 6-man capsule. It would however have produced high G-loads on the crew.
- An alternate configuration would have been derived from the old US Air Force 'Discoverer' recovery capsule. The crew return vehicle version would have been scaled up to accommodate a full Space Station crew of eight astronauts. In 1986 General Electric and NIS Space Ltd. proposed a commercially developed series of such capsules, for unmanned microgravity research as well as Space Station crew rescue.
- The HL-20 Crew Rescue Vehicle was the 'luxury' crew rescue vehicle option. Langley Research Center's $2-billion HL-20 was loosely based on a Soviet spaceplane design. It could carry a crew of eight and might even double as a 'Personnel Launch System' mini-shuttle if launched on a Titan IV rocket. Its lifting body design would have provided superior maneuverability for safe return from orbit. However, Congress balked at the price and cancelled all funding in 1990.
- The X-38 Crew Rescue Vehicle was the solution selected after Congress effectively cancelled the HL-20. NASA had briefly examined using the French 'Hermes' mini-shuttle and off-the-shelf Russian Soyuz capsules as the Space Station's lifeboat before finally settling for the in-house 'cheaperfasterbetter' X-38 design. This vehicle was based on the old X-23/X-24A lifting body which was extensively tested in the 1960s. The total cost was estimated to be approximately 1billion.TheX−38wasdesignedtoreturnallsixInternationalSpaceStationastronautstoEarthinanemergency.NASAwasalsohopingthattheEuropeanSpaceAgencywoulddevelopanX−38CrewTransferVehicleversionthatcouldbelaunchedontheAriane−5rocket.InMarch1998,thetotalexpectedprogramcosttothefirstre−entrytestfromorbitwas1 billion. The X-38 was designed to return all six International Space Station astronauts to Earth in an emergency. NASA was also hoping that the European Space Agency would develop an X-38 Crew Transfer Vehicle version that could be launched on the Ariane-5 rocket. In March 1998, the total expected program cost to the first re-entry test from orbit was 1billion.TheX−38wasdesignedtoreturnallsixInternationalSpaceStationastronautstoEarthinanemergency.NASAwasalsohopingthattheEuropeanSpaceAgencywoulddevelopanX−38CrewTransferVehicleversionthatcouldbelaunchedontheAriane−5rocket.InMarch1998,thetotalexpectedprogramcosttothefirstre−entrytestfromorbitwas280 million, plus 150millionforaShuttlelaunch.ProductionoffouroperationalCRVsplusafifthforgroundtrainingwouldcost150 million for a Shuttle launch. Production of four operational CRVs plus a fifth for ground training would cost 150millionforaShuttlelaunch.ProductionoffouroperationalCRVsplusafifthforgroundtrainingwouldcost500 million. The 8.7m long vehicle was to weigh 9,072 kg and have an in-orbit lifetime of five years. Perhaps the biggest challenge was the giant landing parafoil which was to provide a pinpoint vertical landing capability. The first landing tests were carried out in 1998-99 and the vehicle was to be fully operational in 2003..
Article by Marcus Lindroos
Subtopics
HL-20 American manned spaceplane. The HL-20 was a 1988 NASA Langley design for a manned spaceplane as a backup to the space shuttle (in case it was abandoned or grounded) and as a CERV (Crew Emergency Return Vehicle) for the Freedom space station. |
---|
X-38 American manned spaceplane. Lifting body reentry vehicle designed as emergency return spacecraft for International Space Station crew. Crew Return Vehicle prototypesatellite built by, Aerojet (DPS) for NASA. |
---|
HL-42 American manned spaceplane. The HL-42 was a reusable, lifting body manned spacecraft designed in 1997 to be placed into low-Earth orbit by an expendable booster. |
---|
Dream Chaser American manned spaceplane. A six-passenger human space transport system announced in 2006 by SpaceDev, based on the ten-passenger HL-20 Personnel Launch System developed by NASA Langley in the 1980's. |
---|
Family: Spaceplane, US Rocketplanes. Country: USA. Launch Vehicles: Space Shuttle. Agency: NASA, NASA Houston.
Photo Gallery
NASA ACRVNASA Assured Crew Return Vehicle. Credit: NASA via Marcus Lindroos |
---|
HL-20 CRVHl-20 Crew Rescue VehicleCredit: NASDA via Marcus Lindroos |
---|
X-38 CRVX-38 Crew Rescue Vehicle. Credit: NASA via Marcus Lindroos |
---|
X-38 CRVX-38 Crew Rescue Vehicle. This vehicle is based on the old X-23/X-24A lifting body which was extensively tested in the 1960s.Credit: NASA via Marcus Lindroos |
---|
Home - Search - Browse - Alphabetic Index: 0- 1- 2- 3- 4- 5- 6- 7- 8- 9
A- B- C- D- E- F- G- H- I- J- K- L- M- N- O- P- Q- R- S- T- U- V- W- X- Y- Z
© 1997-2019 Mark Wade - Contact
© / Conditions for Use