Message 104930 - Python tracker (original) (raw)
I see. Let me take a look.
BTW, I tried to use tabs for indentation in the patch, but emacs was
not always happy about it. Is there some c-mode setting that I don't
know about that would take care of that?
On May 4, 2010, at 8:34 AM, Mark Dickinson <report@bugs.python.org>
wrote:
Mark Dickinson <dickinsm@gmail.com> added the comment:
Hi Alexander,
I took the liberty of messing with your patch slightly; I didn't
want to ask you to make further changes since the patch was fine,
and my messing was mostly just to satisfy my own fussiness (only the
first two items were really necessary):Minor updates:
- add Misc/NEWS entry
- remove trailing whitespace and fix spaces that should have been a
tab- added some extra tests to check all possible combinations of bad arguments, purely to check for refcounting problems
- initialize low to NULL, to match the Py_XDECREF(low) (could change that Py_XDECREF to Py_DECREF instead, but the code's more resistant to random refactorings this way --- see next item :)
- randomly refactor: regroup blocks for ease of reading
- don't do PyLong_FromLong(1) until it's needed ('zero' is different, since it's always used in the non-error case)
- [micro-optimization]: don't pass a known zero value to get_range_long_argument
Any objections or comments? Can I apply this version of the patch?
Added file: http://bugs.python.org/file17200/issue1533_metd.diff
Python tracker <report@bugs.python.org> <http://bugs.python.org/issue1533>