Message 230528 - Python tracker (original) (raw)
Message230528
| Author | gvanrossum |
|---|---|
| Recipients | gvanrossum, pitrou, vstinner, yselivanov |
| Date | 2014-11-03.03:10:01 |
| SpamBayes Score | -1.0 |
| Marked as misclassified | Yes |
| Message-id | 1414984201.86.0.988813206392.issue22784@psf.upfronthosting.co.za |
| In-reply-to |
| Content |
|---|
| Is something missing from the patch? I don't understand how *not* defining a function can make anything better. Perhaps you need to conditionally skip the test that uses it? |
| History | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| Date | User | Action | Args |
| 2014-11-03 03:10:01 | gvanrossum | set | recipients: + gvanrossum, pitrou, vstinner, yselivanov |
| 2014-11-03 03:10:01 | gvanrossum | set | messageid: 1414984201.86.0.988813206392.issue22784@psf.upfronthosting.co.za |
| 2014-11-03 03:10:01 | gvanrossum | link | issue22784 messages |
| 2014-11-03 03:10:01 | gvanrossum | create |