tipr: Tipping Point Analyses (original) (raw)

The strength of evidence provided by epidemiological and observational studies is inherently limited by the potential for unmeasured confounding. We focus on three key quantities: the observed bound of the confidence interval closest to the null, the relationship between an unmeasured confounder and the outcome, for example a plausible residual effect size for an unmeasured continuous or binary confounder, and the relationship between an unmeasured confounder and the exposure, for example a realistic mean difference or prevalence difference for this hypothetical confounder between exposure groups. Building on the methods put forth by Cornfield et al. (1959), Bross (1966), Schlesselman (1978), Rosenbaum & Rubin (1983), Lin et al. (1998), Lash et al. (2009), Rosenbaum (1986), Cinelli & Hazlett (2020), VanderWeele & Ding (2017), and Ding & VanderWeele (2016), we can use these quantities to assess how an unmeasured confounder may tip our result to insignificance.

Version: 1.0.2
Depends: R (≥ 2.10)
Imports: cli (≥ 3.4.1), glue, purrr, rlang (≥ 1.0.6), sensemakr, tibble
Suggests: broom, dplyr, MASS, testthat
Published: 2024-02-06
DOI: 10.32614/CRAN.package.tipr
Author: Lucy D'Agostino McGowanORCID iD [aut, cre], Malcolm Barrett ORCID iD [aut]
Maintainer: Lucy D'Agostino McGowan
BugReports: https://github.com/r-causal/tipr/issues
License: MIT + file
URL: https://r-causal.github.io/tipr/, https://github.com/r-causal/tipr
NeedsCompilation: no
Citation: tipr citation info
Materials: README NEWS
CRAN checks: tipr results

Documentation:

Downloads:

Linking:

Please use the canonical formhttps://CRAN.R-project.org/package=tiprto link to this page.