10.2.2.2 Optimizing Subqueries with Materialization (original) (raw)

10.2.2.2 Optimizing Subqueries with Materialization

The optimizer uses materialization to enable more efficient subquery processing. Materialization speeds up query execution by generating a subquery result as a temporary table, normally in memory. The first time MySQL needs the subquery result, it materializes that result into a temporary table. Any subsequent time the result is needed, MySQL refers again to the temporary table. The optimizer may index the table with a hash index to make lookups fast and inexpensive. The index contains unique values to eliminate duplicates and make the table smaller.

Subquery materialization uses an in-memory temporary table when possible, falling back to on-disk storage if the table becomes too large. SeeSection 10.4.4, “Internal Temporary Table Use in MySQL”.

If materialization is not used, the optimizer sometimes rewrites a noncorrelated subquery as a correlated subquery. For example, the following IN subquery is noncorrelated (wherecondition involves only columns from t2 and nott1):

SELECT * FROM t1
WHERE t1.a IN (SELECT t2.b FROM t2 WHERE where_condition);

The optimizer might rewrite this as anEXISTS correlated subquery:

SELECT * FROM t1
WHERE EXISTS (SELECT t2.b FROM t2 WHERE where_condition AND t1.a=t2.b);

Subquery materialization using a temporary table avoids such rewrites and makes it possible to execute the subquery only once rather than once per row of the outer query.

For subquery materialization to be used in MySQL, theoptimizer_switch system variable materialization flag must be enabled. (SeeSection 10.9.2, “Switchable Optimizations”.) With thematerialization flag enabled, materialization applies to subquery predicates that appear anywhere (in the select list, WHERE,ON, GROUP BY,HAVING, or ORDER BY), for predicates that fall into any of these use cases:

(oe_1, oe_2, ..., oe_N) [NOT] IN (SELECT ie_1, i_2, ..., ie_N ...)  
oe [NOT] IN (SELECT ie ...)  

The following examples illustrate how the requirement for equivalence of UNKNOWN andFALSE predicate evaluation affects whether subquery materialization can be used. Assume that_wherecondition_ involves columns only from t2 and not t1 so that the subquery is noncorrelated.

This query is subject to materialization:

SELECT * FROM t1
WHERE t1.a IN (SELECT t2.b FROM t2 WHERE where_condition);

Here, it does not matter whether the IN predicate returns UNKNOWN orFALSE. Either way, the row fromt1 is not included in the query result.

An example where subquery materialization is not used is the following query, where t2.b is a nullable column:

SELECT * FROM t1
WHERE (t1.a,t1.b) NOT IN (SELECT t2.a,t2.b FROM t2
                          WHERE where_condition);

The following restrictions apply to the use of subquery materialization:

Use of EXPLAIN with a query provides some indication of whether the optimizer uses subquery materialization:

MySQL can also apply subquery materialization to a single-table UPDATE orDELETE statement that uses a[NOT] IN or [NOT] EXISTS subquery predicate, provided that the statement does not useORDER BY or LIMIT, and that subquery materialization is allowed by an optimizer hint or by the optimizer_switch setting.