Paul Brook - Re: [gfortran,patch] FPE options, once again (original) (raw)
This is the mail archive of the gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.orgmailing list for the GCC project.
| Index Nav: | [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index] | |
|---|---|---|
| Message Nav: | [Date Prev] [Date Next] | [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] |
| Other format: | [Raw text] |
- From: Paul Brook
- To: fortran at gcc dot gnu dot org
- Cc: FX Coudert ,patch
- Date: Thu, 8 Sep 2005 17:50:11 +0100
- Subject: Re: [gfortran,patch] FPE options, once again
- References: <431768A9.9050409@gmail.com>
On Thursday 01 September 2005 21:46, FX Coudert wrote:
This is the new version of the FPE patch for gfortran, using glibc-specific code on systems where it is available, and runtime detection of SSE units.
I think the code itself is now in pretty good shape, although i'm a bit worried of having heard no word from other gfortran developpers about things such as the option name and the need/convenience of having environment variables.
I thought the last time this was discussed (for a different option), the conclusion was that environment variables were more trouble that they were worth. Applications are liable to mysteriously break because a user didn't have the exact same combination of magic environment variables set.
My preference is for a commandline switch (like you implemented), and maybe a new intrinsic procedure so an application can control the setting at runtime.
Regtested on i686-linux. Testing in progress on i686-freebsd, x86_64-linux and i386-openbsd (no glibc, no SSE).
OK for mainline? Do we want this on 4.0?
- ?int invalid = exceptions & 0x01;
- ?int denormal = exceptions & 0x02;
- ?int zero = exceptions & 0x04;
- ?int overflow = exceptions & 0x08;
- ?int underflow = exceptions & 0x10;
- ?int precision = exceptions & 0x20; ...
- ?gfc_option.fpe_invalid = 0;
- ?gfc_option.fpe_denormal = 0;
- ?gfc_option.fpe_zero = 0;
- ?gfc_option.fpe_overflow = 0;
- ?gfc_option.fpe_underflow = 0;
- ?gfc_option.fpe_precision = 0; [etc]
I agree with RTHs comment that there's no point having all there as separate variables. We convert to/from a bitmap anyway, so we may as well just use that bitmap all the time. Also make the bitmasks into #defines so we don't have hardcoded values in multiple places.
Paul
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: [gfortran,patch] FPE options, once again
* From: Richard Guenther - Re: [gfortran,patch] FPE options, once again
* From: FX Coudert
- Re: [gfortran,patch] FPE options, once again
- References:
- [gfortran,patch] FPE options, once again
* From: FX Coudert
- [gfortran,patch] FPE options, once again
| Index Nav: | [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index] | |
|---|---|---|
| Message Nav: | [Date Prev] [Date Next] | [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] |