Joern RENNECKE - Re: svn diff branch woprking copy against mainline? (original) (raw)
This is the mail archive of the gcc@gcc.gnu.orgmailing list for the GCC project.
| Index Nav: | [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index] | |
|---|---|---|
| Message Nav: | [Date Prev] [Date Next] | [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] |
| Other format: | [Raw text] |
- From: Joern RENNECKE
- To: Daniel Berlin
- Cc: Mike Stump , gcc at gcc dot gnu dot org
- Date: Wed, 02 Nov 2005 23:47:00 +0000
- Subject: Re: svn diff branch woprking copy against mainline?
- References: <43693B4A.9060905@st.com> <66F67765-4AF2-4AAC-97A4-3095F1405752@apple.com> <1130974123.7280.88.camel@IBM-82ZWS052TEN>
Daniel Berlin wrote:
svn needs to go on a long command line diet,
True.
However, it *does* need some way to differentiate between url->url,
url->wc, and wc->url commands, so even if there was an SVNROOT, you'd
still have to specify it on the command lines :)
I can't follow that reasoning. If you have one or more full svn url(s), that is evident.
If you say file@version and no file with that exact name (i.e. including the @) exists,
a specific version of file in the repository is wanted.
If a file argument is specified, it is natural to get the repository location from the
svn info on that file. If no file argument is specified, but the current working directory
has been checked out with svn, it is natural to use the repository location of that directory.
- References:
- svn diff branch woprking copy against mainline?
* From: Joern RENNECKE - Re: svn diff branch woprking copy against mainline?
* From: Mike Stump - Re: svn diff branch woprking copy against mainline?
* From: Daniel Berlin
- svn diff branch woprking copy against mainline?
| Index Nav: | [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index] | |
|---|---|---|
| Message Nav: | [Date Prev] [Date Next] | [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] |