Daniel Jacobowitz - Re: -Wuninitialized issues (original) (raw)

This is the mail archive of the gcc@gcc.gnu.orgmailing list for the GCC project.

• From: Daniel Jacobowitz
• To: Jeffrey A Law
• Cc: Joe Buck ,Gabriel Dos Reis ,Andrew Pinski ,Mark Mitchell ,Diego Novillo ,"Kaveh R. Ghazi" , gcc at gcc dot gnu dot org
• Date: Wed, 2 Nov 2005 22:27:09 -0500
• Subject: Re: -Wuninitialized issues
• References: <200511030052.jA30qAY8005364@earth.phy.uc.edu> <m34q6umt3y.fsf@uniton.integrable-solutions.net> <20051103013251.GF6099@synopsys.com> <20051103014451.GA16464@nevyn.them.org> <1130984226.29507.44.camel@localhost.localdomain>

On Wed, Nov 02, 2005 at 07:17:06PM -0700, Jeffrey A Law wrote:

Very true, but I don't think that's an execute to generate even more false positives for them! :-)

I disagree. The point of this set of warnings is that they would be simple and consistent. Less likely to change across releases, and easier to predict and explain to non-compiler-hackers.

If the option was available, I'd switch GDB over in a heartbeat. Or at least propose it.

-- Daniel Jacobowitz CodeSourcery, LLC

• References:
  • Re: -Wuninitialized issues
    * From: Andrew Pinski
  • Re: -Wuninitialized issues
    * From: Gabriel Dos Reis
  • Re: -Wuninitialized issues
    * From: Joe Buck
  • Re: -Wuninitialized issues
    * From: Daniel Jacobowitz
  • Re: -Wuninitialized issues
    * From: Jeffrey A Law