Jason . Beech-Brandt - ultrasparc3 optimisation (original) (raw)
This is the mail archive of the gcc@gcc.gnu.orgmailing list for the GCC project.
| Index Nav: | [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index] | |
|---|---|---|
| Message Nav: | [Date Prev] [Date Next] | [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] |
| Other format: | [Raw text] |
- From: Jason dot Beech-Brandt at ed dot ac dot uk
- To: gcc at gcc dot gnu dot org
- Date: Wed, 16 Nov 2005 15:58:12 +0000 (GMT)
- Subject: ultrasparc3 optimisation
Hi,
I'm using gcc-4.0.1 on both a UltraSparc3 and UltraSparc3cu systems. When I compile code on the UltraSparc3 system using -mcpu=ultrasparc3 and run the file command on the executable I get
hello: ELF 32-bit MSB executable SPARC32PLUS Version 1, V8+ Required, UltraSPARC1 Extensions Required, dynamically linked, not stripped
so the UltraSparc3 extensions are not used. However, when compiling on the UltraSparc3cu system I get
hello: ELF 32-bit MSB executable SPARC32PLUS Version 1, V8+ Required, UltraSPARC3 Extensions Required, dynamically linked, not stripped
where the UltraSparc3 extensions are used.
Does anybody have any idea why this might happen? Is this expected behaviour for the UltraSparc3 as opposed to the UltraSparc3cu?
Thanks
Jason
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: ultrasparc3 optimisation
* From: Richard Guenther - Re: ultrasparc3 optimisation
* From: Eric Botcazou
- Re: ultrasparc3 optimisation
| Index Nav: | [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index] | |
|---|---|---|
| Message Nav: | [Date Prev] [Date Next] | [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] |