Gabriel Dos Reis - Re: Copies of the GCC repository (original) (raw)
This is the mail archive of the gcc@gcc.gnu.orgmailing list for the GCC project.
| Index Nav: | [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index] | |
|---|---|---|
| Message Nav: | [Date Prev] [Date Next] | [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] |
| Other format: | [Raw text] |
- From: Gabriel Dos Reis
- To: Daniel Jacobowitz
- Cc: Daniel Berlin , GCC Development
- Date: 22 Nov 2005 17:07:12 +0100
- Subject: Re: Copies of the GCC repository
- References: 1130527765.17718.24.camel@linux.site <20051108011747.GA1820@nevyn.them.org>
Daniel Jacobowitz drow@false.org writes:
[...]
| There's a lot to be learned (for me at least) about using svk. At some | point I will update the wiki with useful bits, but I don't have many | just yet. For instance, two open questions while I was writing this: | | - how to make svk refuse commits to the mirrored portion instead of | wanting to push them upstream | - how to make svk access depots remotely | | I'm sure they're both possible, I just don't know how yet :-)
Well, since I do not have an imperial machine equipped lot of gigs on the harddrive, I took the SVK suggestion very seriously.
At the moment, my attempts to commit patches (based on SVK) have met failures and generated lot of frustration.
I have a patchlet to cp/error.c I wanted to commit; so I followed the instructions on the Wiki. My local tree is uptodate with respect to upstream; I launched "svk push --lump". After 5 minutes waiting, I pressed ^C. Then I tried "svk commit"; it prompted me with my favorite editor, I entered the commit-log, saved it and exited the editor. At that time, I was greated with:
Merging back to mirror source svn://gcc.gnu.org/svn/gcc. Use of uninitialized value in concatenation (.) or string at /usr/lib/perl5/vendor_perl/5.8.6/i586-linux-thread-multi/SVN/Core.pm line 576. Authorization failed: at /usr/lib/perl5/vendor_perl/5.8.6/SVK/Command.pm line 152
"svk commirt --file 22239.log" yields same greatings back.
So:
(1) What is supposed to be the blessed tribal incantation to commit a patch to upstream GCC when working with SVK?
(2) Is it normal that "svk push" takes more than 5 minutes to complete? If so, that does not match the speed argument I've seen for the move to SVN.
Thanks,
-- Gaby
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: Copies of the GCC repository
* From: Daniel Jacobowitz - Re: Copies of the GCC repository
* From: Paul Brook - Re: Copies of the GCC repository
* From: Daniel Berlin
- Re: Copies of the GCC repository
- References:
- Re: Copies of the GCC repository
* From: Daniel Jacobowitz
- Re: Copies of the GCC repository
| Index Nav: | [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index] | |
|---|---|---|
| Message Nav: | [Date Prev] [Date Next] | [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] |