Gabriel Dos Reis - Re: Thoughts on LLVM and LTO (original) (raw)

This is the mail archive of the gcc@gcc.gnu.orgmailing list for the GCC project.

Index Nav: [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav: [Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next]
Other format: [Raw text]

Chris Lattner sabre@nondot.org writes:

| On Tue, 23 Nov 2005, Gabriel Dos Reis wrote: | > Diego Novillo dnovillo@redhat.com writes: | > | On Tuesday 22 November 2005 18:42, David Edelsohn wrote: | > | > I will work with the GCC SC and FSF on that issue once the licensing | > | > issue is addressed and we know LLVM is a viable option. | > | > | > | What purpose would that serve? I'm not concerned about the SC, initially. | > | It's the development community at large that needs convincing first. | > | > help me finish converting GCC to something compilable with a C++ compiler. | > Without having something concrete to test with, we'll go again over | > abstract arguments -- I did the conversion (many times) on my machine | > as a proof-of-concept. | > | > Lots of things kept (and are keeping) me busy. But, I'm back now and | > working on it. I'd not mind more hands/help. | | Why is this important?

For what? LLVM? I never said it was.

| I'm finding that compiling GCC with a C | compiler and using extern "C" around the headers works just fine.

some of us needs more than just 'extern "C"' around the headers. And also notice that, not a long time ago you could not just pretend an 'extern "C"' around the headers and compiler it. For more information, search the archive.

-- Gaby

Index Nav: [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav: [Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next]