Andrew Pinski - Re: Java on uClinux (original) (raw)
This is the mail archive of the gcc@gcc.gnu.orgmailing list for the GCC project.
| Index Nav: | [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index] | |
|---|---|---|
| Message Nav: | [Date Prev] [Date Next] | [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] |
| Other format: | [Raw text] |
- From: Andrew Pinski
- To: bernds_cb1 at t-online dot de (Bernd Schmidt)
- Cc: aph at redhat dot com (Andrew Haley), ddaney at avtrex dot com (David Daney), gdr at integrable-solutions dot net (Gabriel Dos Reis), gcc at gcc dot gnu dot org, java at gcc dot gnu dot org
- Date: Mon, 28 Nov 2005 19:42:47 -0500 (EST)
- Subject: Re: Java on uClinux
Andrew Haley wrote:
Bernd Schmidt writes:
Hmm, we can trap null pointer accesses, but I don't think we deliver reliable SIGSEGV signals yet or provide a means of getting the faulting address. If that was fixed, is there anything obvious that stands in the way of a uClinux/uClibc port?
I don't think so. The only other dependency we have is POSIX threads.
Ok, thanks. Assuming I get around to porting them, where do I submit libffi/boehm_gc changes? Is there an upstream version to worry about?
There is an upsteam for beohm_gc (Boehm himself).
For libffi, unoffficially GCC is the maintainer.
-- Pinski
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: Java on uClinux
* From: Eric Botcazou
- Re: Java on uClinux
- References:
- Re: Java on uClinux
* From: Bernd Schmidt
- Re: Java on uClinux
| Index Nav: | [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index] | |
|---|---|---|
| Message Nav: | [Date Prev] [Date Next] | [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] |