[RFC 03/12] drm/i915: Mark as legacy if KMS is disabled (original) (raw)

Thierry Reding thierry.reding at gmail.com
Fri Feb 21 00:28:25 PST 2014


On Fri, Feb 21, 2014 at 03:17:28AM -0500, Ilia Mirkin wrote:

On Fri, Feb 21, 2014 at 2:55 AM, Thierry Reding <thierry.reding at gmail.com> wrote: > From: Thierry Reding <treding at nvidia.com> > > When kernel mode-setting is disabled, mark the driver as legacy to pick > up the special semantics required for userspace mode-setting. > > Signed-off-by: Thierry Reding <treding at nvidia.com> > --- > drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915drv.c | 8 +++++++- > 1 file changed, 7 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-) > > diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915drv.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915drv.c > index 2d05d7ce4c29..ea916e117f01 100644 > --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915drv.c > +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915drv.c _> @@ -985,13 +985,19 @@ static int init i915init(void) > #if defined(CONFIGDRMI915KMS) > if (i915.modeset != 0) > driver.driverfeatures |= DRIVERMODESET; > + else > + driver.driverfeatures |= DRIVERLEGACY; > #endif > if (i915.modeset == 1) > driver.driverfeatures |= DRIVERMODESET; > + else > + driver.driverfeatures |= DRIVERLEGACY;

If i915.modeset == -1 (which seems like a legal value as per the hunk below, and I'm guessing the default), it'll end up with both MODESET and LEGACY. Is that a legal combination?

I don't see a reason why the combination would be illegal, but it doesn't make a lot of sense either. So I think the above hunk should be turned into this instead:

Thierry -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: not available Type: application/pgp-signature Size: 836 bytes Desc: not available URL: <http://lists.freedesktop.org/archives/dri-devel/attachments/20140221/90250735/attachment.pgp>



More information about the dri-devel mailing list