[LLVMdev] What CCAssignToXXXWithShadow means? (original) (raw)
Anton Korobeynikov anton at korobeynikov.info
Fri Sep 23 04:43:51 PDT 2011
- Previous message: [LLVMdev] What CCAssignToXXXWithShadow means?
- Next message: [LLVMdev] constantexpr problem
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Hello
I think ecx and xmm0 are physical different registers (not like ecx and cx), right? So why we cannot use xmm0 while ecx has been used? Is it just a rule or there are some considerations behind it? Yes. Due to way how varargs stuff is implemented. You always have data in, say, general-purpose regs regardless of whether it's floating point or integer.
If we assign to R0, then R0 is marked occupied. Is it a redundant statement? Here - yes. Just to make sure alignment works.
If you can point me to some reference aboue "register alignment", I'll be very appreciate it. Does register alignment bring benefit? In other word, why register alignment is needed? This is documented in AAPCS ABI.
So the word "shadow" on http://www.heyrick.co.uk/assembler/regs.html means different thing, hugh? Yes. Here "shadow" is Microsoft term. Check http://msdn.microsoft.com/en-US/library/zthk2dkh(v=VS.80).aspx and http://msdn.microsoft.com/en-US/library/6yy8aw4d(v=VS.80).aspx
for more information
-- With best regards, Anton Korobeynikov Faculty of Mathematics and Mechanics, Saint Petersburg State University
- Previous message: [LLVMdev] What CCAssignToXXXWithShadow means?
- Next message: [LLVMdev] constantexpr problem
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]