[LLVMdev] [PROPOSAL] LLVM multi-module support (original) (raw)
dag at cray.com dag at cray.com
Thu Jul 26 08:13:03 PDT 2012
- Previous message: [LLVMdev] [PROPOSAL] LLVM multi-module support
- Next message: [LLVMdev] [PROPOSAL] LLVM multi-module support
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Duncan Sands <baldrick at free.fr> writes:
Hi Tobias, I didn't really get it. Is the idea that the same bitcode is going to be codegen'd for different architectures, or is each sub-module going to contain different bitcode? In the later case you may as well just use multiple modules, perhaps in conjunction with a scheme to store more than one module in the same file on disk as a convenience.
I tend to agree. Why do we need a whole new submodule concept?
-Dave
- Previous message: [LLVMdev] [PROPOSAL] LLVM multi-module support
- Next message: [LLVMdev] [PROPOSAL] LLVM multi-module support
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]