[LLVMdev] lld coding style (original) (raw)

Nick Kledzik kledzik at apple.com
Mon Oct 6 17:00:06 PDT 2014

On Oct 6, 2014, at 3:44 PM, Rui Ueyama <ruiu at google.com> wrote:

Looks like most people in this thread support using LLVM style in LLD. I also had an offline discussion and many people wanted to have one coding style in all LLVM projects. So I'm convinced that we should do that.

I'm going to create a patch to rename all variables if no one objects. I object!

-Nick

On Mon, Oct 6, 2014 at 3:10 PM, Bruce Hoult <bruce at hoult.org> wrote: On Tue, Oct 7, 2014 at 8:54 AM, Rui Ueyama <ruiu at google.com> wrote: would touch all the lines. Diff is not powerful enough to trace the history beyond variable renaming. svn blame would become useless. "useless" is much too strong a description. If svn blame points to the reformat commit, then simply re-run the blame on the commit before the reformat. If total reformats are frequent then this is impractical. If they happen once in five years then it's not really a big deal. Wrapper scripts can even be pretty easily written to do this automatically.

LLVM Developers mailing list LLVMdev at cs.uiuc.edu http://llvm.cs.uiuc.edu http://lists.cs.uiuc.edu/mailman/listinfo/llvmdev

-------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: <http://lists.llvm.org/pipermail/llvm-dev/attachments/20141006/d0771b56/attachment.html>

More information about the llvm-dev mailing list