[LLVMdev] [RFC] Less memory and greater maintainability for debug info IR (original) (raw)

Eric Christopher echristo at gmail.com
Fri Oct 17 17:36:32 PDT 2014

On Fri, Oct 17, 2014 at 4:53 PM, Bob Wilson <bob.wilson at apple.com> wrote:

On Oct 17, 2014, at 12:02 PM, Alex Rosenberg <alexr at leftfield.org> wrote:

On Oct 17, 2014, at 8:47 AM, Duncan P. N. Exon Smith <dexonsmith at apple.com> wrote:

On 2014 Oct 16, at 22:09, Sean Silva <chisophugis at gmail.com> wrote: Dig into this first! This isn't the right forum for digging into ld64. I would at least hope that if the issue is in ld64 itself and not LTO, that we are making sure that lld is not repeating the same choices here. FWIW, we have our own custom linker and LTO builds easily chews through memory into this peak size realm, way beyond what a non-LTO link would do. Yes, absolutely. There are quite a few different aspects of improving LTO scalability. Most of them are not specific to a particular linker. This is just one of them. If you guys want to tackle other problems, feel free.

+1.

-eric

LLVM Developers mailing list LLVMdev at cs.uiuc.edu http://llvm.cs.uiuc.edu http://lists.cs.uiuc.edu/mailman/listinfo/llvmdev

More information about the llvm-dev mailing list